• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

距离创新、亲属关系强度和心理特征。

Distance to innovations, kinship intensity, and psychological traits.

机构信息

Toulouse Business School (TBS), University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Toulouse School of Economics (TSE) and Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST), University of Toulouse 1 Capitole, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0279864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279864. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0279864
PMID:36701307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9879433/
Abstract

Psychological traits display substantial variation worldwide. These psychological variations could be explained by the intensity of kinship ties which, we hypothesize, depends on the reception of innovations that gradually complexified family organizations. These innovations originated from several centers across the world that also spread other crucial novelties such as agriculture. Less exposed to these family innovations, areas far from centers of innovation should exhibit lower kinship intensity. Indeed, we show that distance to innovation centers is strongly associated with kinship intensity. This distance is also associated with psychological traits especially outside Western Europe in which exposure to the Church seems to play an additional role.

摘要

心理特征在全球范围内存在显著差异。这些心理差异可以用亲属关系的紧密程度来解释,我们假设亲属关系的紧密程度取决于创新的接受程度,而创新逐渐使家庭组织复杂化。这些创新起源于世界各地的几个中心,也传播了其他关键的新颖性,如农业。在远离创新中心的地区,这些家庭创新的接受程度较低,亲属关系的强度应该较低。事实上,我们发现,与创新中心的距离与亲属关系的强度密切相关。这种距离也与心理特征有关,特别是在欧洲以外的地区,在那里,教会的影响似乎起着额外的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/991c/9879433/394f6c68e5d9/pone.0279864.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/991c/9879433/394f6c68e5d9/pone.0279864.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/991c/9879433/394f6c68e5d9/pone.0279864.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Distance to innovations, kinship intensity, and psychological traits.距离创新、亲属关系强度和心理特征。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0279864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279864. eCollection 2023.
2
The Church, intensive kinship, and global psychological variation.教会、密集的亲属关系与全球心理差异。
Science. 2019 Nov 8;366(6466). doi: 10.1126/science.aau5141.
3
The transmission of pottery technology among prehistoric European hunter-gatherers.史前欧洲狩猎采集者之间的制陶技术传播。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Feb;7(2):171-183. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01491-8. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
4
Bioassay of kinship in northwestern Europe.
Ann Hum Genet. 1977 Oct;41(2):249-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1977.tb01921.x.
5
Spatial and temporal variation in kinship among Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes.冈比亚按蚊(双翅目:蚊科)亲缘关系的时空变化
J Med Entomol. 2003 Jul;40(4):421-9. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-40.4.421.
6
Community differentiation and kinship among Europe's first farmers.欧洲第一批农民的社群分化与亲属关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 12;109(24):9326-30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113710109. Epub 2012 May 29.
7
Origins of Indo-Europeans and the spread of agriculture in Europe: comparison of lexicostatistical and genetic evidence.印欧人的起源与欧洲农业的传播:词汇统计证据与基因证据的比较
Hum Biol. 1995 Aug;67(4):577-94.
8
Parental and kinship ties, and low self-control: Violence perpetration among rural African American adolescents from the Black Belt.父母和亲属关系,以及自我控制能力低:来自黑人区的农村非裔美国青少年的暴力犯罪。
J Adolesc. 2020 Dec;85:115-119. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
9
Genetic evidence for the spread of agriculture in Europe by demic diffusion.农业在欧洲通过人口扩散传播的遗传学证据。
Nature. 1991 May 9;351(6322):143-5. doi: 10.1038/351143a0.
10
Estimation of inbreeding, kinship, genetic distances, and population structure from surnames: The island of Hvar, Croatia.利用姓氏估计近亲繁殖、亲属关系、遗传距离和种群结构:克罗地亚的赫瓦尔岛
Am J Hum Biol. 1997;9(5):595-607. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(1997)9:5<595::AID-AJHB7>3.0.CO;2-T.

本文引用的文献

1
Kinship and social organization in Copper Age Europe. A cross-disciplinary analysis of archaeology, DNA, isotopes, and anthropology from two Bell Beaker cemeteries.铜器时代欧洲的亲属关系和社会组织。来自两个有角杯葬墓的考古学、DNA、同位素和人类学的跨学科分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 16;15(11):e0241278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241278. eCollection 2020.
2
The Church, intensive kinship, and global psychological variation.教会、密集的亲属关系与全球心理差异。
Science. 2019 Nov 8;366(6466). doi: 10.1126/science.aau5141.
3
Territorial expansion and primary state formation.
领土扩张与原始国家形成。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 20;107(16):7119-26. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002470107. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
4
Ancient DNA, Strontium isotopes, and osteological analyses shed light on social and kinship organization of the Later Stone Age.古DNA、锶同位素和骨学分析揭示了晚石器时代的社会和亲属组织。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 25;105(47):18226-31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807592105. Epub 2008 Nov 17.