Surgical management of spontaneous middle cranial fossa defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis of available reconstructive techniques and materials.

Different materials and techniques have been proposed for surgical repair of spontaneous middle cranial fossa (MCF) defects. However, conclusive evidence supporting their selection and impact on clinical outcomes is lacking. The study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on materials and techniques employed to repair MCF defects and evaluate complications and rates of recurrent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. A PRISMA-guided systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using MESH terms and specific keywords including studies published before May 2022. Primary outcomes included recurrence of CSF leak and complication rates by type of reconstructive material and technique utilized. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed using random effects and confidence intervals for individual proportions were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. Twenty-nine studies were included (n = 471 cases). Materials employed for repair were categorized according to defect size: 65% of defects were of unknown size, 24% were small (< 1 cm), and 11% were large (≥ 1 cm). Rigid reconstruction (RR) was significantly favored over soft reconstruction (SR) for larger defects (94% of cases, p < 0.05). Complications and recurrent CSF leak rates of SR and RR techniques were comparable for defects of all sizes (p > 0.05). Complication rates reported for these procedures are low regardless of technique and material. RR was universally preferred for larger defects and analysis of complication and recurrence rates did not reveal differences regardless of defect size. While RR was more frequently reported in smaller defects, SR was used by several centers, particularly for smaller MCF floor defects.