Department of Psychology, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.
Nutr Health. 2023 Sep;29(3):435-441. doi: 10.1177/02601060231153427. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
Defining mindful eating and discussing all it entails has proven to be abstract, open-ended and biased to the interpretation of the researchers and authors in the field. Despite some consensus, different interpretations have led to different psychometric tools and practices not descriptive of mindful eating, contributing towards a replication crisis. This narrative review will draw on the most appropriate definition of mindful eating in the framework of traditional secular mindfulness literature and discuss how mindful eating psychometrics and practices are unsuitable for precise research. A proposal and directive of separation between and in mindful eating as a way of developing evidence-based practices and psychometric tools are proposed for both clinical and non-clinical use.
定义正念饮食并讨论其所有内容已被证明是抽象的、开放式的,并且容易受到该领域研究人员和作者的解释的影响。尽管已经达成了一些共识,但不同的解释导致了不同的心理计量工具和实践,这些工具和实践无法描述正念饮食,从而导致了复制危机。本叙事综述将借鉴传统世俗正念文献中正念饮食的最合适定义,并讨论正念饮食心理计量和实践如何不适合精确研究。本文提出并指导了在正念饮食中将“意识”和“饮食”分开的方法,以便为临床和非临床用途开发基于证据的实践和心理计量工具。