• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关注个体需求的正念饮食：潜在剖面分析以及人口统计学和社会认知信念探索

Addressing individual needs in mindful eating: a latent profile analysis and exploration of demographics and social-cognitive beliefs.

作者信息

Preissner Christian E, de Ruijter Dennis, Oenema Anke, de Vries Hein

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University Maastricht, Netherlands.

Department of Health Psychology, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Psychol Behav Med. 2025 Jun 30;13(1):2519587. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2025.2519587. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1080/21642850.2025.2519587
PMID:40599682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12210480/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To promote mindful eating it may be relevant to take different eating profiles into account. This prospective study aimed to (i) identify the existence of potential respondent subgroups regarding mindful eating and (ii) compare these profiles on socio-demographic characteristics and social-cognitive beliefs about mindful eating using the I-Change Model (ICM).

METHODS

Dutch adults (M = 52.6; 53% male) responded to an online survey at baseline ( = 615) and 3-months ( = 513) follow-up asking about social-cognitive beliefs about practicing mindful eating based on the ICM. Following a latent profile analysis of mindful eating facets, profiles at baseline were compared on social-cognitive beliefs at follow-up using a MANOVA with Tukey-adjusted post-hoc tests.

RESULTS

Three profiles were identified (1. low awareness, high acceptance; 2. high awareness, low acceptance; 3. moderate awareness, moderate acceptance). These profiles significantly differed in their demographics and social-cognitive beliefs about mindful eating (e.g., knowledge, perceived pros and cons, self-efficacy, intention and planning to adopt mindful eating).

DISCUSSION

Findings suggest the limitations of a one-size-fits-all approach to promoting mindful eating. Interventions may need to consider different recruitment and targeted strategies based on socio-demographic characteristics and social-cognitive beliefs to ensure different groups of individuals are represented in and can benefit from interventions in a safe and accessible way.

摘要

引言

为了促进正念饮食，考虑不同的饮食模式可能是相关的。这项前瞻性研究旨在：（i）确定在正念饮食方面潜在的受访者亚组的存在，以及（ii）使用行为改变模型（ICM），在社会人口统计学特征和关于正念饮食的社会认知信念方面比较这些模式。

方法

荷兰成年人（平均年龄M = 52.6岁；53%为男性）在基线（n = 615）和3个月随访（n = 513）时对一项在线调查做出回应，该调查询问基于行为改变模型的关于实践正念饮食的社会认知信念。在对正念饮食方面进行潜在剖面分析之后，使用带有图基校正事后检验的多变量方差分析，在随访时的社会认知信念方面比较基线时的剖面。

结果

识别出三种模式（1. 低意识、高接受度；2. 高意识、低接受度；3. 中等意识、中等接受度）。这些模式在人口统计学以及关于正念饮食的社会认知信念方面（例如，知识、感知到的利弊、自我效能、采用正念饮食的意图和计划）存在显著差异。

讨论

研究结果表明，采用一刀切的方法来促进正念饮食存在局限性。干预措施可能需要根据社会人口统计学特征和社会认知信念，考虑不同的招募和针对性策略，以确保不同群体的个体能够以安全且可及的方式参与干预并从中受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7cf/12210480/84c7efc4a139/RHPB_A_2519587_F0006_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7cf/12210480/3b9c4ea05d6d/RHPB_A_2519587_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7cf/12210480/b355103187e4/RHPB_A_2519587_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7cf/12210480/bfeed988eaf2/RHPB_A_2519587_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7cf/12210480/d35cbd250944/RHPB_A_2519587_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7cf/12210480/5e3980157a11/RHPB_A_2519587_F0005_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7cf/12210480/84c7efc4a139/RHPB_A_2519587_F0006_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7cf/12210480/3b9c4ea05d6d/RHPB_A_2519587_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7cf/12210480/b355103187e4/RHPB_A_2519587_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7cf/12210480/bfeed988eaf2/RHPB_A_2519587_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7cf/12210480/d35cbd250944/RHPB_A_2519587_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7cf/12210480/5e3980157a11/RHPB_A_2519587_F0005_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7cf/12210480/84c7efc4a139/RHPB_A_2519587_F0006_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Addressing individual needs in mindful eating: a latent profile analysis and exploration of demographics and social-cognitive beliefs.关注个体需求的正念饮食：潜在剖面分析以及人口统计学和社会认知信念探索
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2025 Jun 30;13(1):2519587. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2025.2519587. eCollection 2025.
2
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念：一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
3
Face-to-face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination.针对向父母宣传或教育幼儿疫苗接种情况的面对面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 8;5(5):CD010038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010038.pub3.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施：系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Healthy eating interventions delivered in early childhood education and care settings for improving the diet of children aged six months to six years.在幼儿教育和照护环境中实施的健康饮食干预措施，以改善 6 个月至 6 岁儿童的饮食。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 22;8(8):CD013862. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013862.pub3.
6
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Risk-stratified Care Improves Pain-related Knowledge and Reduces Psychological Distress for Low Back Pain: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.风险分层护理可提高腰痛患者的疼痛相关知识并减轻心理困扰：一项随机试验的二次分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):607-620. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003351. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物：网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素：定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
10
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历：定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review on the effectiveness of unstandardized mindfulness interventions in improving dietary and physical activity outcomes in healthy adults.一项关于非标准化正念干预对改善健康成年人饮食和身体活动结果有效性的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 8;25(1):1705. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22850-w.
2
Development and initial validation of the trait and state Mindful Eating Behaviour Scales.特质和状态正念饮食行为量表的编制与初步验证。
Eat Weight Disord. 2023 Oct 25;28(1):88. doi: 10.1007/s40519-023-01614-8.
3
Mindful eating: A conceptual critical review of the literature, measurement and intervention development.
正念饮食：文献、测量和干预发展的概念批判性回顾。
Nutr Health. 2023 Sep;29(3):435-441. doi: 10.1177/02601060231153427. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
4
Examining socio-cognitive factors and beliefs about mindful eating in healthy adults with differing practice experience: a cross-sectional study.考察不同练习经验的健康成年人的社会认知因素和正念饮食信念：一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Nov 15;10(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00977-4.
5
Latent profile analysis as a method for process evaluations: Discovering response subgroups in a mindfulness intervention.潜在剖面分析作为一种过程评估方法：在正念干预中发现反应亚组。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;296:114748. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114748. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
6
Development and Validation of the Four Facet Mindful Eating Scale (FFaMES).四维度正念饮食量表（FFaMES）的编制与验证。
Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105689. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105689. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
7
Mindful acceptance, not awareness, associated with lower food susceptibility.正念接纳，而非意识，与较低的食物易感性相关。
Eat Weight Disord. 2022 May;27(4):1481-1489. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01288-0. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
8
An Eight-Week Mindful Eating Program Applied in a Mediterranean Population With Overweight or Obesity: The EATT Intervention Study.一项为期八周的针对超重或肥胖的地中海人群的正念饮食干预研究。
Psychol Rep. 2022 Apr;125(2):1011-1040. doi: 10.1177/0033294120988104. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
9
(Re)defining mindful eating into mindful eating behaviour to advance scientific enquiry.将正念饮食（再）定义为正念饮食行为，以推进科学研究。
Nutr Health. 2021 Dec;27(4):367-371. doi: 10.1177/0260106020984091. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
10
The Influence of Mindful Eating and/or Intuitive Eating Approaches on Dietary Intake: A Systematic Review.正念饮食和/或直觉饮食方法对饮食摄入的影响：系统评价。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Apr;121(4):709-727.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.10.019. Epub 2020 Dec 3.