Scardini Iandara Lima, Sarra Giovanna, Braga Mariana Minatel, Dos Santos Marcelo, Freire Laila Gonzales
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Iran Endod J. 2023;18(2):71-84. doi: 10.22037/iej.v18i2.39945.
The nonsurgical endodontic retreatment (NERT) is the first choice of dental ministration when primary/initial endodontic treatment fails. The present study aimed to investigate the presence of postoperative pain (POP) after NERT in permanent asymptomatic teeth as well as possible factors associated with POP.
A comprehensive search of literature was performed in Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases, up to January 2023; including randomized clinical trials and prospective studies. The risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. Subgroups analyses were conducted to evaluate the differences in the incidence or level of POP between the number of visits, the use/not use of solvent, the removal technique of gutta-percha, and the period of POP analysis. Mean differences and confidence intervals (CI) of 95% were used as measures of effect, and meta-regression was used along with subgroup analysis. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE, and the probability value of <0.05 was considered significant
Twenty-four studies were selected, with thirteen included in the meta-analysis. There was a statistical difference between the incidence of POP after 24 h (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.52) and one week (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.13) from the endodontic retreatment (<0.01). However, there was no statistical difference between different techniques, number of visits and use of solvent (>0.05) in the same period. In addition, the certainty of evidence was very low.
Post-operative pain is a common response to NERT, independent of the retreatment technique(s) applied, number of visits and use of solvent(s); with very low certainty of evidence as well as low risk of bias. Moreover, the current analysis showed a (very) serious risk of inconsistency and imprecision. However, POP was significantly reduced within 1 week of the NERT.
当首次/初始牙髓治疗失败时,非手术牙髓再治疗(NERT)是牙科治疗的首选方法。本研究旨在调查恒牙无症状牙齿进行NERT术后疼痛(POP)的情况以及与POP相关的可能因素。
截至2023年1月,在PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中进行了全面的文献检索;包括随机临床试验和前瞻性研究。使用RoB 2.0和ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。进行亚组分析以评估就诊次数、是否使用溶剂、牙胶去除技术以及POP分析时间段之间POP发生率或水平的差异。采用95%的平均差异和置信区间(CI)作为效应量度,并结合亚组分析进行meta回归。使用GRADE评估证据的确定性,概率值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
共筛选出24项研究,其中13项纳入meta分析。牙髓再治疗后24小时(95%CI,0.28至0.52)和1周(95%CI,0.02至0.13)的POP发生率之间存在统计学差异(<0.01)。然而,同期不同技术、就诊次数和是否使用溶剂之间无统计学差异(>0.05)。此外,证据的确定性非常低。
术后疼痛是NERT的常见反应,与所应用的再治疗技术、就诊次数和是否使用溶剂无关;证据确定性非常低且偏倚风险低。此外,当前分析显示存在(非常)严重的不一致性和不精确性风险。然而,NERT后1周内POP显著降低。