Department of Dermatology, Razi Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Skin Res Technol. 2023 Jan;29(1):e13273. doi: 10.1111/srt.13273.
Cutaneous granulomatous disorders (CGDs) can share some features, but an accurate assessment of various findings and their pattern can be useful in differentiating them. In addition to common dermoscopic findings for CGDs, some peculiar dermoscopic characteristics can be helpful in distinguishing them.
Herein, we aimed to evaluate dermoscopic findings in patients with CGDs and determine the dermoscopic criteria that could suggest the type of granulomatous disorder.
A total of 107 cases including 75 (70.09%) males and 32 (29.90%) females with an established diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis (n = 49), cutaneous sarcoidosis (n = 23), granuloma annulare (GA) (n = 18), and tattoo granuloma (n = 17) confirmed by clinical and pathological studies were included. Based on the previous studies available in the literature, we wrote a checklist containing dermoscopic features of CGDs. Afterward, two dermatologists independently reviewed all dermoscopic images for the presence or absence of each item on the checklist. Descriptive analysis, fisher exact, chi-square, and t-test were used. The granulomatous disorders with larger sample sizes were selected for further analysis, including the univariate and conditional multivariate logistic regressions.
The most prevalent nonvascular findings in all of our CGD patients were white scaling (N = 67%, 62.61%), diffuse or localized orange structureless areas (N = 53%, 49.53%), and diffuse erythema (N = 48%, 44.85%). Furthermore, the most frequent vascular findings in all of our CGD cases were branching and arborizing vessels (N = 30%, 28.03%), linear irregular (N = 30%, 28.03%), and dotted vessels (N = 27%, 25.23%).
For differentiating leishmaniasis from sarcoidosis by dermoscopy, white scaling and white scarring areas are more suggestive of cutaneous leishmaniasis, whereas the presence of arborizing vessels would be more in favor of sarcoidosis. When comparing GA to cutaneous leishmaniasis, the latter significantly shows more linear irregular vessels, hairpin vessels, white scaling, and white scarring areas. In the case of differentiating sarcoidosis from GA, the presence of hairpin vessels would be suggestive of sarcoidosis.
皮肤肉芽肿性疾病(CGD)可能具有一些共同特征,但准确评估各种表现及其模式有助于区分它们。除了 CGD 的常见皮肤镜表现外,一些特殊的皮肤镜特征有助于区分它们。
本研究旨在评估 CGD 患者的皮肤镜表现,并确定可提示肉芽肿性疾病类型的皮肤镜标准。
共纳入 107 例患者,包括 75 例男性(70.09%)和 32 例女性(29.90%),其中皮肤利什曼病(n=49)、皮肤结节病(n=23)、环状肉芽肿(GA)(n=18)和纹身肉芽肿(n=17)的临床和病理研究均证实了 CGD 的诊断。根据现有文献中的先前研究,我们编写了一份检查表,其中包含 CGD 的皮肤镜特征。然后,两位皮肤科医生独立审查了所有皮肤镜图像,以确定检查表上的每个项目是否存在。使用描述性分析、Fisher 精确检验、卡方检验和 t 检验。选择样本量较大的肉芽肿性疾病进行进一步分析,包括单变量和条件多变量逻辑回归。
我们所有 CGD 患者中最常见的非血管性表现为白色鳞屑(N=67%,62.61%)、弥漫性或局限性橙色无结构区域(N=53%,49.53%)和弥漫性红斑(N=48%,44.85%)。此外,我们所有 CGD 病例中最常见的血管性表现为分支和树状血管(N=30%,28.03%)、线性不规则血管(N=30%,28.03%)和点状血管(N=27%,25.23%)。
通过皮肤镜鉴别利什曼病和结节病,白色鳞屑和白色瘢痕区域更提示皮肤利什曼病,而树状血管的存在则更倾向于结节病。当比较 GA 与皮肤利什曼病时,后者明显表现出更多的线性不规则血管、发夹状血管、白色鳞屑和白色瘢痕区域。在鉴别结节病和 GA 时,发夹状血管的存在提示结节病。