Suppr超能文献

碘浸渍切口巾预防清洁或清洁污染伤口患者手术部位感染的效果:系统文献回顾和成本-后果分析。

Effectiveness of iodine-impregnated incise drapes for preventing surgical site infection in patients with clean or clean contaminated wounds: A systematic literature review and cost-consequence analysis.

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

3M UK PLC, Loughborough, UK.

出版信息

J Perioper Pract. 2023 Dec;33(12):368-379. doi: 10.1177/17504589221139603. Epub 2023 Jan 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection is a serious complication associated with significant morbidity, mortality and health care expenditure.

AIMS

To determine the clinical effectiveness and economic impact of using iodine-impregnated incise drapes for preventing surgical site infection.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases were systematically searched. Critical appraisal and synthesis of clinical evidence informed a decision analytical cost-consequence model.

FINDINGS

Nine studies were included in the systematic literature review. Evidence from cardiac surgery patients was considered appropriate to inform the cost analysis. The economic model evaluation estimated cost savings of £549 per patient with the iodophor-impregnated drape in the deterministic analysis and a mean cost saving per patient of £554,172 per 1000 in the probabilistic analysis.

CONCLUSION

Using iodine-impregnated drapes in cardiac surgery patients may effectively reduce infections and provide cost-savings, but further research is required.

摘要

背景

手术部位感染是一种严重的并发症,会导致发病率、死亡率和医疗支出显著增加。

目的

确定使用碘浸渍切口巾预防手术部位感染的临床效果和经济影响。

方法

系统检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 CINAHL 数据库。对临床证据进行了关键性评估和综合分析,以构建决策分析成本-效益模型。

结果

系统文献综述共纳入了 9 项研究。心脏手术患者的证据被认为适合为成本分析提供信息。经济模型评估估计,在确定性分析中,每例患者使用含碘敷巾可节省 549 英镑,在概率分析中,每 1000 例患者可节省 554172 英镑。

结论

在心脏手术患者中使用含碘敷巾可能有效降低感染率并节省成本,但需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f03/10693728/04ce95418bd5/10.1177_17504589221139603-fig1.jpg

相似文献

2
Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD006353. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006353.pub2.
3
Intraoperative interventions for preventing surgical site infection: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD012653. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012653.pub2.
4
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub7.
6
Intracavity lavage and wound irrigation for prevention of surgical site infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 30;10(10):CD012234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012234.pub2.
9
Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 22;2016(1):CD004288. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004288.pub3.
10
Dressings and topical agents for the management of open wounds after surgical treatment for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013439.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Lean Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Draping.
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2025 Jan 8;10:100156. doi: 10.1016/j.jposna.2024.100156. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Does an Antimicrobial Incision Drape Prevent Intraoperative Contamination? A Randomized Controlled Trial of 1187 Patients.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 May;478(5):1007-1015. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001142.
3
The Effectiveness of Sterile Wound Drapes in the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Thoracic Surgery.
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Feb 11;2019:1438793. doi: 10.1155/2019/1438793. eCollection 2019.
4
Incise Draping Reduces the Rate of Contamination of the Surgical Site During Hip Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Trial.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jun;33(6):1891-1895. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
5
Intraoperative interventions for preventing surgical site infection: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD012653. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012653.pub2.
7
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017.
JAMA Surg. 2017 Aug 1;152(8):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904.
8
Impact of surgical site infection on healthcare costs and patient outcomes: a systematic review in six European countries.
J Hosp Infect. 2017 May;96(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
9
Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect.
Evid Based Med. 2017 Jun;22(3):85-87. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110668. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
10
New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Dec;16(12):e276-e287. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30398-X. Epub 2016 Nov 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验