Centre Population et Développement (Ceped), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) et Université Paris Cité, Inserm ERL 1244, 45 Rue Des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France.
French Collaborative Institute On Migrations, CNRS, Aubervilliers, France.
AIDS Behav. 2023 Aug;27(8):2763-2773. doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-04000-8. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
Combination HIV prevention aims to provide the right mix of biomedical, behavioral and structural interventions, and is considered the best approach to curb the HIV pandemic. The impact evaluation of combined HIV prevention intervention (CHPI) provides critical information for decision making. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to map the designs and methods used in these studies. We searched original articles indexed in Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed. Fifty-eight studies assessing the impact of CHPI on HIV transmission were included. Most of the studies took place in Asia or sub-Saharan Africa and were published from 2000 onward. We identified 36 (62.1%) quasi-experimental studies (posttest, pretest-posttest and nonequivalent group designs) and 22 (37.9%) experimental studies (randomized designs). The findings suggest that diverse methods are already rooted in CHPI impact evaluation practices as recommended but should be better reported. CHPI impact evaluation would benefit from more comprehensive approaches.
联合艾滋病预防旨在提供适当的组合生物医学、行为和结构干预措施，被认为是遏制艾滋病大流行的最佳方法。联合艾滋病预防干预措施（CHPI）的影响评估为决策提供了关键信息。我们对文献进行了系统回顾，以绘制这些研究中使用的设计和方法。我们在 Web of Science、Scopus 和 PubMed 中搜索了原始文章。共有 58 项研究评估了 CHPI 对艾滋病毒传播的影响。大多数研究发生在亚洲或撒哈拉以南非洲地区，发表于 2000 年以后。我们确定了 36 项（62.1%）准实验研究（后测、前后测和非等效组设计）和 22 项（37.9%）实验研究（随机设计）。研究结果表明，虽然已有多种方法扎根于 CHPI 影响评估实践中，但这些方法应该得到更好的报告。CHPI 影响评估将受益于更全面的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021-6-19
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021-2-11
Zotero 插件