Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic.
Baskent University School of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Mar;170:195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.014. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
The "intermediate-risk" (IR) group of early-stage cervical cancer patients is characterized by negative pelvic lymph nodes and a combination of tumor-related prognostic risk factors such as tumor size ≥2 cm, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and deep stromal invasion. However, the role of adjuvant treatment in these patients remains controversial. We investigated whether adjuvant (chemo)radiation is associated with a survival benefit after radical surgery in patients with IR cervical cancer.
We analyzed data from patients with IR cervical cancer (tumor size 2-4 cm plus LVSI OR tumor size >4 cm; N0; no parametrial invasion; clear surgical margins) who underwent primary curative-intent surgery between 2007 and 2016 and were retrospectively registered in the international multicenter Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) study.
Of 692 analyzed patients, 274 (39.6%) received no adjuvant treatment (AT-) and 418 (60.4%) received radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (AT+). The 5-year disease-free survival (83.2% and 80.3%; P = 0.365) and overall survival (88.7% and 89.0%; P = 0.281) were not significantly different between the AT- and AT+ groups, respectively. Adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy was not associated with a survival benefit after adjusting for confounding factors by case-control propensity score matching or in subgroup analyses of patients with tumor size ≥4 cm and <4 cm. In univariable analysis, adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy was not identified as a prognostic factor in any of the subgroups (full cohort: P = 0.365; P = 0.282).
Among patients with IR early-stage cervical cancer, radical surgery alone achieved equal disease-free and overall survival rates to those achieved by combining radical surgery with adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy.
早期宫颈癌的“中危”(IR)组患者的特点是盆腔淋巴结阴性,且存在肿瘤相关预后危险因素的组合,如肿瘤大小≥2cm、脉管间隙浸润(LVSI)和深间质浸润。然而,这些患者的辅助治疗作用仍存在争议。我们研究了在 IR 宫颈癌患者中,根治性手术后辅助(放)化疗是否与生存获益相关。
我们分析了 2007 年至 2016 年期间接受根治性手术治疗且在国际多中心 Surveillance in Cervical CANcer(SCCAN)研究中被回顾性登记的 IR 宫颈癌患者(肿瘤大小 2-4cm 伴 LVSI 或肿瘤大小>4cm;N0;无宫旁侵犯;切缘清晰)的数据。
在分析的 692 例患者中,274 例(39.6%)未接受辅助治疗(AT-),418 例(60.4%)接受放疗或放化疗(AT+)。AT-组和 AT+组的 5 年无疾病生存率(83.2%和 80.3%;P=0.365)和总生存率(88.7%和 89.0%;P=0.281)无显著差异。调整病例对照倾向评分匹配或肿瘤大小≥4cm 和<4cm 亚组分析中的混杂因素后,辅助(放)化疗与生存获益无关。在单变量分析中,辅助(放)化疗在任何亚组中均未被确定为预后因素(全队列:P=0.365;P=0.282)。
在 IR 早期宫颈癌患者中,单纯根治性手术与根治性手术联合辅助(放)化疗的无病生存率和总生存率相当。