• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大流行第一波后长期护理机构中医疗保健人员中 SARS-CoV2 感染的血清阳性率:一项横断面研究。

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV2 Infections in Health Care Personnel in a Long-Term Care Institution After the First Wave of the Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.

机构信息

Hospital Virgen de la Poveda.

Alcorcón Foundation University Hospital.

出版信息

Workplace Health Saf. 2023 May;71(5):229-237. doi: 10.1177/21650799221135587. Epub 2023 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1177/21650799221135587
PMID:36708002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9895301/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

At the time of our study, occupational health evidence specific for long-term care employees was mostly lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of positive cases in employees after the first COVID-19 wave in May 2020. We also determined the prevalence of asymptomatic cases.

METHOD

The study population included all health care workers (HCW) employed at one mid-size long-term hospital in Spain (May 2020). A cross-sectional study design included an interviewer-administered self-reported questionnaire (including sociodemographic questions, risk factors for COVID-19 complications such as hypertension or diabetes, and previous polymerase chain reaction [PCR] results) and antibody determination (Biozek rapid test). Data were analyzed using Student's , Fisher, and chi-square tests. Two multivariate logistic models were created to evaluate exposure factors and symptoms separately on the outcome of having had COVID-19.

FINDINGS

Of the 97% of workers who participated (580/596), 300 (51.7%) suffered symptoms of COVID-19, 161 (27.8%) of the rapid antibody tests were positive for IgM and/or IgG, 160 (27.6%) workers had at least one risk factor, and 32 (19.0%) of the 168 SARS-CoV-2-positive cases were asymptomatic. The proportion of negative or unavailable PCRs, with positive antibody, was 11.7% (56/477). Casual contact without protection (odds ratio [OR]: 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-3.4), doctor occupation (OR 3.3, 95% CI: 1.1-10.2), and nursing assistant occupation (OR 2.5, 95% CI: 1.2-5.8) were independently associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

CONCLUSION

Physicians and nursing assistants in a long-term care setting were at a higher risk of SARS-COV-2 infection over other occupations in the first wave of the pandemic, especially when in contact with patients without protection. Almost one-fifth of the workers with a positive PCR test for SARS-COV-2 were asymptomatic and seroprevalence (27.8%) was well below the approximated herd immunity cutoff (60-70%). Essential workers in long-term care must be monitored frequently by Employee Health Service and should be required to wear personal protective equipment including a fit-tested N-95 while in close contact with patients and coworkers.

摘要

背景

在我们进行研究时,针对长期护理员工的职业健康证据大多缺乏。本研究的目的是确定 2020 年 5 月第一波 COVID-19 后员工中阳性病例的比例。我们还确定了无症状病例的流行率。

方法

研究人群包括在西班牙一家中型长期医院工作的所有医护人员(2020 年 5 月)。采用横断面研究设计,包括访谈者管理的自我报告问卷(包括社会人口学问题、COVID-19 并发症的危险因素,如高血压或糖尿病,以及之前的聚合酶链反应[PCR]结果)和抗体测定(Biozek 快速检测)。使用学生 t 检验、Fisher 检验和卡方检验进行数据分析。建立了两个多变量逻辑模型,分别评估接触因素和症状对 COVID-19 结局的影响。

结果

在参与的 97%的工作人员中(580/596),有 300 人(51.7%)出现 COVID-19 症状,161 人(27.8%)快速抗体检测 IgM 和/或 IgG 阳性,160 人(27.6%)有至少一个危险因素,32 人(19.0%)SARS-CoV-2 阳性病例无症状。PCR 结果阴性或无法获得、抗体阳性的比例为 11.7%(56/477)。无保护的偶然接触(比值比[OR]:1.9,95%置信区间[CI]:1.1-3.4)、医生职业(OR 3.3,95%CI:1.1-10.2)和护理助理职业(OR 2.5,95%CI:1.2-5.8)与 SARS-CoV-2 感染独立相关。

结论

在大流行的第一波中,长期护理机构的医生和护理助理比其他职业更容易感染 SARS-CoV-2,尤其是在与无保护的患者接触时。近五分之一的 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 检测阳性的患者无症状,血清阳性率(27.8%)远低于估计的群体免疫临界值(60-70%)。长期护理机构的基本工作人员必须由员工健康服务部门定期监测,并要求在与患者和同事密切接触时佩戴个人防护设备,包括适合测试的 N-95 口罩。

相似文献

1
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV2 Infections in Health Care Personnel in a Long-Term Care Institution After the First Wave of the Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.大流行第一波后长期护理机构中医疗保健人员中 SARS-CoV2 感染的血清阳性率:一项横断面研究。
Workplace Health Saf. 2023 May;71(5):229-237. doi: 10.1177/21650799221135587. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
2
Authors' response: Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.作者回复:在德国首次大流行期间,工人的职业与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险:潜在的偏见。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):588-590. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4061. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
3
Parallel evolution and differences in seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibody between patients with cancer and health care workers in a tertiary cancer centre during the first and second wave of COVID-19 pandemic: canSEROcov-II cross-sectional study.在 COVID-19 大流行的第一波和第二波期间,一家三级癌症中心的癌症患者和医护人员中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的血清阳性率的平行进化和差异:canSEROcov-II 横断面研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Apr;165:13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
4
Higher rate of SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity in hospital-based healthcare workers compared to elderly care staff in a Swedish low-prevalence region: a cross-sectional study.在瑞典低流行地区,与老年护理人员相比,医院医护人员的 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 血清阳性率更高:一项横断面研究。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2021 Nov-Dec;53(12):920-929. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2021.1959949. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
5
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in over 6000 healthcare workers in Spain.西班牙6000多名医护人员中新型冠状病毒2型抗体的血清阳性率
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 May 17;50(2):400-409. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa277.
6
Controlled, double-blind, randomized trial to assess the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine chemoprophylaxis in SARS CoV2 infection in healthcare personnel in the hospital setting: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.在医院环境中评估羟氯喹化学预防 SARS-CoV2 感染在医护人员中的疗效和安全性的对照、双盲、随机试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04400-4.
7
Seroprevalence of and Risk Factors Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.在 COVID-19 大流行早期,意大利医护人员中 SARS-CoV-2 感染的血清流行率及其相关危险因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115699. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15699.
8
[SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among workers in a hospital in Madrid.].[马德里一家医院工作人员中新型冠状病毒2型血清流行率]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2021 Oct 22;95:e202110176.
9
Cross-sectional study evaluating the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthcare workers and factors associated with exposure during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York.横断面研究评估了 COVID-19 大流行第一波期间纽约医护人员中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的血清阳性率,以及与暴露相关的因素。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 3;11(11):e053158. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053158.
10
SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in healthcare workers of a teaching hospital in a highly endemic region in the Netherlands after the first wave: a cross-sectional study.荷兰高度流行地区一所教学医院的医护人员在第一波疫情后感染 SARS-CoV-2 的血清流行率:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 18;11(10):e051573. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051573.

引用本文的文献

1
Human Genes Involved in the Interaction between Host and Gut Microbiome: Regulation and Pathogenic Mechanisms.人类基因在宿主与肠道微生物组相互作用中的作用:调控和致病机制。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Mar 31;14(4):857. doi: 10.3390/genes14040857.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital-Wide SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in health care workers in a Spanish teaching hospital.西班牙教学医院医护人员的 SARS-CoV-2 血清流行率的医院内调查。
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2022 Jun-Jul;40(6):302-309. doi: 10.1016/j.eimce.2020.11.025.
2
Predictive symptoms for COVID-19 in the community: REACT-1 study of over 1 million people.社区中 COVID-19 的预测症状:超过 100 万人的 REACT-1 研究。
PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 28;18(9):e1003777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003777. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
An assessment of self-reported COVID-19 related symptoms of 227,898 users of a social networking service in Japan: Has the regional risk changed after the declaration of the state of emergency?对日本一家社交网络服务的227,898名用户自我报告的与COVID-19相关症状的评估:紧急状态声明后地区风险是否发生了变化?
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2020 Aug;1:100011. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100011. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
4
Serological study of healthcare workers in four different hospitals in Madrid (Spain) with no previous history of COVID-19.对西班牙马德里四家不同医院中无新冠病毒疾病既往史的医护人员进行的血清学研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2021 May 26. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-107001.
5
Evaluation of 32 rapid tests for detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.评估 32 种快速检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的方法。
Clin Chim Acta. 2021 Aug;519:133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.04.016. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
6
Tobacco and COVID-19: A position from Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Authors' reply.烟草与2019冠状病毒病:葡萄牙胸科学会的立场。作者回复
Pulmonology. 2021 May-Jun;27(3):278-279. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.01.012. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
7
Main differences between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Madrid, Spain.西班牙马德里新冠疫情第一波和第二波之间的主要差异。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:374-376. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.115. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
8
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibody among healthcare workers in a university hospital in Mallorca, Spain, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.西班牙马略卡岛一家大学医院医护人员在 COVID-19 大流行第一波期间 SARS-CoV-2 抗体血清阳性率。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:482-486. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.104. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
9
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy for eight SARS-CoV-2 serological assays.八种 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测方法的诊断准确性比较。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Feb 15;31(1):010708. doi: 10.11613/BM.2021.010708.
10
COVID-19 and healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 与医护人员:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;104:335-346. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Jan 11.