Scheunemann Jakob, Kühn Simone, Biedermann Sarah V, Lipp Michael, Peth Judith, Gallinat Jürgen, Jelinek Lena
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Lise Meitner Group for Environmental Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Germany.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;79:101836. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101836. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
Performance on implicit measures of suicidality has been associated with suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injury. Despite the high prevalence of self-harm in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD), no previous study has assessed implicit measures in this patient group.
Forty patients with BPD and 25 healthy controls completed three implicit association tests (IATs) (Death words - Me/Others words, Self-Harm pictures - Me/Others, and Self-Harm pictures - Good/Bad words) and a subliminal priming task (effect of the primes "dying"/"growing" on the categorization speed of positive/negative adjectives) as well as measures of psychopathology (suicidal ideation, previous nonsuicidal self-injury, borderline symptomatology, depression, and hopelessness).
Patients with BPD had higher scores on all three IATs than healthy controls. The subliminal priming procedure did not reveal group differences. Correlations between implicit measures and psychopathology among patients with BPD were mostly weak and nonsignificant with a few exceptions: Positive correlations were observed between IAT Self-Harm - Good/Bad and lifetime frequency of nonsuicidal self-injury, between IAT Self-Harm - Me/Others and depression, and between IAT Death - Me/Others and depression. Correlations between implicit measures were weak to moderate.
The study was cross-sectional only, and the study had reduced power as the sample size was limited.
As expected, patients with BPD had higher scores than healthy controls on the IATs, which indicates higher implicit self-identification with self-harm and death as well as stronger implicit positive attitudes towards self-harm. The mostly weak correlations between implicit and explicit measures speak against the discriminative value of IATs in patients with BPD.
自杀倾向的内隐测量表现与自杀及非自杀性自我伤害有关。尽管边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者中自我伤害的发生率很高,但此前尚无研究评估该患者群体的内隐测量情况。
40例BPD患者和25名健康对照者完成了三项内隐联想测验(IAT)(死亡词汇 - 我/他人词汇、自我伤害图片 - 我/他人、自我伤害图片 - 好/坏词汇)和一项阈下启动任务(启动词“死亡”/“成长”对正/负性形容词分类速度的影响),以及心理病理学测量(自杀观念、既往非自杀性自我伤害、边缘型症状、抑郁和绝望感)。
BPD患者在所有三项IAT上的得分均高于健康对照者。阈下启动程序未显示出组间差异。BPD患者的内隐测量与心理病理学之间的相关性大多较弱且无统计学意义,少数例外情况如下:IAT自我伤害 - 好/坏与非自杀性自我伤害的终生频率之间、IAT自我伤害 - 我/他人与抑郁之间、IAT死亡 - 我/他人与抑郁之间存在正相关。内隐测量之间的相关性为弱到中度。
该研究仅为横断面研究,且由于样本量有限,研究效能降低。
正如预期的那样,BPD患者在IAT上的得分高于健康对照者,这表明他们在自我伤害和死亡方面的内隐自我认同更高,以及对自我伤害的内隐积极态度更强。内隐测量与外显测量之间大多较弱的相关性表明IAT在BPD患者中的鉴别价值不大。