Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Division of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan.
J Orthop Sci. 2023 Nov;28(6):1337-1344. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.10.009. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
It has been difficult to study the effects of arch support on multiple joints simultaneously. Herein, we evaluated foot and ankle kinematics using a fully automated analysis system, "4D-Foot," consisting of a biplane X-ray imager and two-dimensional‒three-dimensional registration, with automated image segmentation and landmark detection tools.
We evaluated the effect of arch support on ankle, subtalar, and talonavicular joint kinematics in five healthy female volunteers without a clinical history of foot and ankle disorders. Computed tomography images of the foot and ankle and X-ray videos of walking barefoot and with arch support were acquired. A kinematic analysis using the "4D-Foot" system was performed. The ankle, subtalar, and talonavicular joint kinematics were quantified from heel-strike to foot-off, with and without arch support.
For the ankle joint, significant differences were observed in dorsi/plantarflexion, inversion/eversion, and internal/external rotation in the late midstance phase. The dorsi/plantarflexion and inversion/eversion motions were smaller with arch support. For the subtalar joint, a significant difference was observed in all the dynamic motions in the heel-strike and late midstance phases. For the talonavicular joint, significant differences were observed in inversion/eversion and internal/external rotation in heel-strike and the late midstance phases. For the subtalar and talonavicular joints, the motion was larger with arch support. An extremely strong correlation was observed when the motion of the subtalar and talonavicular joints was compared for each condition and motion.
The results indicated that the arch support decreased the ankle motion and increased the subtalar and talonavicular joint motions. Additionally, our study demonstrated that the in vivo subtalar and talonavicular joints revealed a strong correlation, suggesting that the navicular and calcaneal bones were moving similarly to the talus and that the arch support stabilizes the ankle joint and compensatively increases the subtalar and talonavicular joint motions.
同时研究足弓支撑对多个关节的影响一直存在困难。在此,我们使用由双平面 X 射线成像仪和二维到三维配准、自动图像分割和地标检测工具组成的全自动分析系统“4D-Foot”评估了足部和踝关节的运动学。
我们评估了足弓支撑对 5 名无足部和踝关节疾病临床病史的健康女性志愿者的踝关节、距下关节和跗跖关节运动学的影响。获取足部和踝关节的计算机断层扫描图像和裸足及足弓支撑行走的 X 射线视频。使用“4D-Foot”系统进行运动学分析。在有无足弓支撑的情况下,从足跟触地到足离地阶段,对踝关节、距下关节和跗跖关节的运动学进行量化。
对于踝关节,在中足后期的背屈/跖屈、内翻/外翻和内旋/外旋运动中观察到显著差异。足弓支撑时,背屈/跖屈和内翻/外翻运动减小。对于距下关节,在足跟触地和中足后期的所有动态运动中观察到显著差异。对于跗跖关节,在足跟触地和中足后期的内翻/外翻和内旋/外旋运动中观察到显著差异。对于距下关节和跗跖关节,足弓支撑时运动幅度更大。在比较每种条件和运动时,距下关节和跗跖关节的运动具有极强的相关性。
结果表明,足弓支撑减小了踝关节的运动,增加了距下关节和跗跖关节的运动。此外,我们的研究表明,体内距下关节和跗跖关节显示出很强的相关性,这表明跗骨和跟骨与距骨和跟骨的运动相似,足弓支撑稳定了踝关节并补偿性地增加了距下关节和跗跖关节的运动。