Department of Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and History of Science, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jun;38(11-12):7656-7677. doi: 10.1177/08862605221147070. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
There has been growing concern about the increase in gender-based violence (GBV) among young people. The aim of this study was to explore the grey zones in GBV alongside gender (masculinities and femininities) discourses in young adults. We used the concept of a "grey zone" as an analytical tool to identify possible contradictory discursive positions where the notions of victims and perpetrators of GBV converge and become ambiguous. We performed a qualitative study based on 20 semi-structured interviews and 4 focus groups (October 2019 to February 2020) in Spain with a sample of 49 cisgender women and men, aged between 18 and 24, some involved in feminist activism and some not. We conducted a sociological analysis of the discourse system. Study findings show how culturally constructed gender norms intervene in the ways in which young people understand and deal with GBV. When asked general questions about GBV, this concept was problematized along with gender assumptions and two discursive positions were identified: the discourse of "men as authors of GBV" and the discourse of "GBV as an individual genderless issue." When vignettes of everyday GBV situations were shown, grey zones became visible when discussing subtle forms of GBV influenced by the myths of romantic love, victim-blaming around sexual violence, digital GBV and bystander men intervention on GBV. In those grey zones, discourses on GBV were articulated around unequal notions of gender that, in turn, served as its justification, reproduction, and normalization. The grey zones identified represent contexts of oppression that illustrate how GBV is systematically reproduced, as well as the ways in which young people can be involved in it, perpetuating power and health inequalities. Our findings provide information as a guide to design GBV interventions and prevention actions that incorporate a focus on gender configurations.
人们越来越关注年轻人中性暴力(GBV)的增加。本研究旨在探讨年轻人中性别(男性气质和女性气质)话语中的 GBV 灰色地带。我们使用“灰色地带”这一概念作为分析工具,以确定可能存在的矛盾话语立场,即在受害者和 GBV 肇事者的概念趋同并变得模糊的地方。我们在西班牙进行了一项基于 20 次半结构化访谈和 4 个焦点小组(2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 2 月)的定性研究,样本包括 49 名跨性别女性和男性,年龄在 18 至 24 岁之间,一些人参与女权主义活动,一些人没有。我们对话语系统进行了社会学分析。研究结果表明,文化构建的性别规范如何干预年轻人理解和处理 GBV 的方式。当被问及关于 GBV 的一般性问题时,这个概念与性别假设一起被问题化,并确定了两个话语立场:“男性是 GBV 的作者”的话语和“GBV 是一个无性别问题”的话语。当展示日常 GBV 情况的小插曲时,当讨论受浪漫爱情神话、性暴力周围的受害者指责、数字 GBV 和旁观者男性对 GBV 的干预等微妙形式的 GBV 时,灰色地带变得明显。在这些灰色地带中,围绕不平等的性别观念表达了 GBV 话语,而这些观念反过来又为其提供了合理性、再生产和正常化。确定的灰色地带代表了压迫的背景,说明了 GBV 是如何系统地被复制的,以及年轻人如何参与其中,从而延续权力和健康不平等。我们的研究结果提供了信息指南,以设计将性别配置作为重点的 GBV 干预和预防措施。