• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区作为结核病预防与控制干预措施实施的积极参与者:一项范围综述

The community as an active part in the implementation of interventions for the prevention and control of tuberculosis: a scoping review.

作者信息

Chavez-Rimache Lesly, Ugarte-Gil César, Brunette Maria J

机构信息

Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Perú.

School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Perú.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2023 Jan 11:2023.01.10.22283706. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.10.22283706.

DOI:10.1101/2023.01.10.22283706
PMID:36711680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9882411/
Abstract

Interventions involving direct community stakeholders include a variety of approaches in which members take an active role in improving their health. We evaluated studies in which the community has actively participated to strengthen tuberculosis prevention and control programs. A literature search was performed in Pubmed, Scopus, ERIC, Global Index Medicus, Scielo, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Google Scholar, speciality journals, and other bibliographic references. The primary question for this review was: what is known about tuberculosis control interventions and programs in which the community has been an active part?. Two reviewers performed the search, screening and selection of studies independently. In cases of discrepancies over the eligibility of an article, it was resolved by consensus. 130 studies were selected, of which 68.47% (n=89/130) were published after 2010. The studies were conducted in Africa (44.62%), the Americas (22.31%) and Southeast Asia (19.23%). It was found that 20% (n=26/130) of the studies evaluated the participation of the community in the detection/active search of cases, 20.77% (n=27/130) in the promotion/prevention of tuberculosis; 23.07% (n=30/130) in identifying barriers to treatment, 46.15% (n=60/130) in supervision during treatment and 3.08% (n=4/130) in social support for patient. Community participation not only strengthens the capacities of health systems for the prevention and control of tuberculosis, but also allows a better understanding of the disease from the perspective of the patient and the affected community by identifying barriers and difficulties through of the tuberculosis care cascade. Engaging key community stakeholders in co-creating solutions offers a critical pathway for local governments to eradicate TB.

摘要

涉及社区直接利益相关者的干预措施包括多种方法,其中社区成员积极参与改善自身健康。我们评估了社区积极参与加强结核病预防和控制项目的研究。在PubMed、Scopus、ERIC、全球医学索引、Scielo、Cochrane图书馆、LILACS、谷歌学术、专业期刊及其他文献参考资料中进行了文献检索。本次综述的主要问题是:关于社区积极参与的结核病控制干预措施和项目,我们了解到了什么?两名评审员独立进行研究的检索、筛选和选择。在文章入选资格存在分歧的情况下,通过协商解决。共选择了130项研究,其中68.47%(n = 89/130)于2010年后发表。这些研究在非洲(44.62%)、美洲(22.31%)和东南亚(19.23%)开展。结果发现,20%(n = 26/130)的研究评估了社区在病例发现/主动搜索中的参与情况,20.77%(n = 27/130)评估了在结核病促进/预防方面的参与情况;23.07%(n = 30/130)评估了在确定治疗障碍方面的参与情况,46.15%(n = 60/130)评估了在治疗期间监督方面的参与情况,3.08%(n = 4/130)评估了在为患者提供社会支持方面的参与情况。社区参与不仅增强了卫生系统预防和控制结核病的能力,还能通过结核病防治流程识别障碍和困难,从患者及受影响社区的角度更好地了解该疾病。让关键社区利益相关者共同创造解决方案为地方政府消除结核病提供了一条关键途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae4/9882411/03399a0175c4/nihpp-2023.01.10.22283706v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae4/9882411/03399a0175c4/nihpp-2023.01.10.22283706v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae4/9882411/03399a0175c4/nihpp-2023.01.10.22283706v1-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
The community as an active part in the implementation of interventions for the prevention and control of tuberculosis: a scoping review.社区作为结核病预防与控制干预措施实施的积极参与者:一项范围综述
medRxiv. 2023 Jan 11:2023.01.10.22283706. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.10.22283706.
2
The community as an active part in the implementation of interventions for the prevention and care of tuberculosis: A scoping review.社区作为结核病预防和护理干预措施实施中的积极组成部分:一项范围综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Dec 15;3(12):e0001482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001482. eCollection 2023.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Evidence-informed practice versus evidence-based practice educational interventions for improving knowledge, attitudes, understanding, and behavior toward the application of evidence into practice: A comprehensive systematic review of UG student.基于证据的实践与循证实践教育干预对提高本科学生将证据应用于实践的知识、态度、理解和行为的影响:一项全面的系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 16;18(2):e1233. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1233. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
Exploring community participation in vectorborne disease control in Southeast Asia: a scoping review protocol.探索东南亚地区媒介传播疾病控制中的社区参与:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 13;14(5):e079963. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079963.
8
Mapping evidence on tuberculosis active case finding policies, strategies, and interventions for tuberculosis key populations: a systematic scoping review protocol.绘制结核病活动性病例发现政策、策略和干预措施证据图:针对结核病重点人群的系统范围界定审查方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 10;8(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1098-1.
9
Interventions to enhance corporate sector engagement in tuberculosis response in Africa: a scoping review protocol.加强非洲企业部门参与结核病应对的干预措施:一项范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):e089472. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089472.
10
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.