Murty Dinavahi V P S, Song Songtao, Surampudi Srinivas Govinda, Pessoa Luiz
bioRxiv. 2023 Jan 20:2023.01.20.524987. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.20.524987.
In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. In addition, the extent to which aversive- and appetitive-related processing engage distinct or overlapping circuits remains poorly understood. Here, we sought to investigate the dynamics of aversive and appetitive processing while male and female participants engaged in comparable trials involving threat-avoidance or reward-seeking. A central goal was to characterize the temporal evolution of responses during periods of . For example, in the aversive domain, we predicted that the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST), but not the amygdala, would exhibit anticipatory responses given the role of the former in anxious apprehension. We also predicted that the periaqueductal gray (PAG) would exhibit threat-proximity responses based on its involvement in proximal-threat processes, and that the ventral striatum would exhibit threat-imminence responses given its role in threat escape in rodents. Overall, we uncovered imminence-related temporally increasing ("ramping") responses in multiple brain regions, including the BST, PAG, and ventral striatum, subcortically, and dorsal anterior insula and anterior midcingulate, cortically. Whereas the ventral striatum generated anticipatory responses in the proximity of reward as expected, it also exhibited threat-related imminence responses. In fact, across multiple brain regions, we observed a main effect of arousal. In other words, we uncovered extensive temporally-evolving, imminence-related processing in both the aversive and appetitive domain, suggesting that distributed brain circuits are dynamically engaged during the processing of biologically relevant information irrespective of valence, findings further supported by network analysis.
In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. Here, we sought to investigate the dynamics of aversive/appetitive processing while participants engaged in trials involving threat-avoidance or reward-seeking. A central goal was to characterize the temporal evolution of responses during periods of . We uncovered imminence-related temporally increasing ("ramping") responses in multiple brain regions, including the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, periaqueductal gray, and ventral striatum, subcortically, and dorsal anterior insula and anterior midcingulate, cortically. Overall, we uncovered extensive temporally-evolving, imminence-related processing in both the aversive and appetitive domain, suggesting that distributed brain circuits are dynamically engaged during the processing of biologically relevant information irrespective of valence.
在人类大脑中,厌恶和奖赏处理过程已在相当静态的环境中通过受控刺激进行了研究。此外,与厌恶和奖赏相关的处理过程在多大程度上涉及不同或重叠的神经回路仍知之甚少。在此,我们试图研究男性和女性参与者在涉及避免威胁或寻求奖励的可比试验中,厌恶和奖赏处理的动态过程。一个核心目标是描述在 期间反应的时间演变。例如,在厌恶领域,鉴于终纹床核(BST)在焦虑担忧中的作用,我们预测它会表现出预期反应,而杏仁核则不会。我们还预测中脑导水管周围灰质(PAG)会因其参与近端威胁过程而表现出威胁接近反应,并且鉴于腹侧纹状体在啮齿动物威胁逃避中的作用,它会表现出威胁迫近反应。总体而言,我们在多个脑区发现了与迫近相关的时间上增加(“斜坡式”)的反应,包括皮质下的BST、PAG和腹侧纹状体,以及皮质的背侧前岛叶和前扣带回中部。正如预期的那样,腹侧纹状体在奖赏接近时产生预期反应,但它也表现出与威胁相关的迫近反应。事实上,在多个脑区,我们观察到了觉醒的主效应。换句话说,我们在厌恶和奖赏领域都发现了广泛的随时间演变的、与迫近相关的处理过程,这表明在处理生物学相关信息时,无论效价如何,分布式脑回路都会动态参与,网络分析进一步支持了这一发现。
在人类大脑中,厌恶和奖赏处理过程已在相当静态的环境中通过受控刺激进行了研究。在此,我们试图研究参与者在涉及避免威胁或寻求奖励的试验中厌恶/奖赏处理的动态过程。一个核心目标是描述在 期间反应的时间演变。我们在多个脑区发现了与迫近相关的时间上增加(“斜坡式”)的反应,包括皮质下的终纹床核、中脑导水管周围灰质和腹侧纹状体,以及皮质的背侧前岛叶和前扣带回中部。总体而言,我们在厌恶和奖赏领域都发现了广泛的随时间演变的、与迫近相关的处理过程,这表明在处理生物学相关信息时,无论效价如何,分布式脑回路都会动态参与。