Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742.
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
J Neurosci. 2023 Apr 19;43(16):2973-2987. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1778-22.2023. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. In addition, the extent to which aversive-related and appetitive-related processing engage distinct or overlapping circuits remains poorly understood. Here, we sought to investigate the dynamics of aversive and appetitive processing while male and female participants engaged in comparable trials involving threat avoidance or reward seeking. A central goal was to characterize the temporal evolution of responses during periods of threat or reward imminence. For example, in the aversive domain, we predicted that the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST), but not the amygdala, would exhibit anticipatory responses given the role of the former in anxious apprehension. We also predicted that the periaqueductal gray (PAG) would exhibit threat-proximity responses based on its involvement in proximal-threat processes, and that the ventral striatum would exhibit threat-imminence responses given its role in threat escape in rodents. Overall, we uncovered imminence-related temporally increasing ("ramping") responses in multiple brain regions, including the BST, PAG, and ventral striatum, subcortically, and dorsal anterior insula and anterior midcingulate, cortically. Whereas the ventral striatum generated anticipatory responses in the proximity of reward as expected, it also exhibited threat-related imminence responses. In fact, across multiple brain regions, we observed a main effect of arousal. In other words, we uncovered extensive temporally evolving, imminence-related processing in both the aversive and appetitive domain, suggesting that distributed brain circuits are dynamically engaged during the processing of biologically relevant information regardless of valence, findings further supported by network analysis. In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. Here, we sought to investigate the dynamics of aversive/appetitive processing while participants engaged in trials involving threat avoidance or reward seeking. A central goal was to characterize the temporal evolution of responses during periods of threat or reward imminence. We uncovered imminence-related temporally increasing ("ramping") responses in multiple brain regions, including the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, periaqueductal gray, and ventral striatum, subcortically, and dorsal anterior insula and anterior midcingulate, cortically. Overall, we uncovered extensive temporally evolving, imminence-related processing in both the aversive and appetitive domain, suggesting that distributed brain circuits are dynamically engaged during the processing of biologically relevant information regardless of valence.
在人类大脑中,人们已经使用控制刺激在相当静态的环境中研究了厌恶和欲望加工。此外,厌恶相关加工和欲望相关加工所涉及的不同或重叠的回路的程度仍知之甚少。在这里,我们试图在男性和女性参与者参与涉及回避威胁或寻求奖励的类似试验时,研究厌恶和欲望加工的动态。一个核心目标是描述威胁或奖励迫近期间的反应的时间演变。例如,在厌恶领域,我们预测由于前者在焦虑期待中的作用,终纹床核(BST)而不是杏仁核,将表现出预期的反应。我们还预测,由于其在近端威胁过程中的参与,导水管周围灰质(PAG)将表现出威胁接近反应,并且由于其在啮齿动物中威胁逃避中的作用,腹侧纹状体将表现出威胁迫近反应。总体而言,我们在多个脑区发现了与迫近相关的时间增加(“上升”)反应,包括 BST、PAG 和腹侧纹状体,在皮质下,以及背侧前岛叶和前扣带皮层。虽然腹侧纹状体如预期的那样在奖励的临近处产生预期的反应,但它也表现出与威胁相关的迫近反应。事实上,在多个脑区,我们观察到了唤醒的主要影响。换句话说,我们在厌恶和欲望领域都发现了广泛的、随时间演变的、迫近相关的加工,这表明无论效价如何,分布的大脑回路都在动态地参与处理生物相关信息,这一发现进一步得到了网络分析的支持。在人类大脑中,人们已经使用控制刺激在相当静态的环境中研究了厌恶和欲望加工。在这里,我们试图在参与者参与涉及回避威胁或寻求奖励的试验时,研究厌恶/欲望加工的动态。一个核心目标是描述威胁或奖励迫近期间的反应的时间演变。我们在多个脑区发现了与迫近相关的时间增加(“上升”)反应,包括终纹床核、导水管周围灰质和腹侧纹状体,在皮质下,以及背侧前岛叶和前扣带皮层。总的来说,我们在厌恶和欲望领域都发现了广泛的、随时间演变的、与迫近相关的加工,这表明无论效价如何,分布的大脑回路都在动态地参与处理生物相关信息。