van der Veen Susanne M, Perera Robert A, Manning-Franke Laura, Agyemang Amma A, Skop Karen, Sponheim Scott R, Wilde Elisabeth A, Stamenkovic Alexander, Thomas James S, Walker William C
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Professions, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Front Neurol. 2023 Jan 11;13:906661. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.906661. eCollection 2022.
Among patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), postural instability often persists chronically with negative consequences such as higher fall risk. One explanation may be reduced executive function (EF) required to effectively process, interpret and combine, sensory information. In other populations, a decline in higher cognitive functions are associated with a decline in walking and balance skills. Considering the link between EF decline and reduction in functional capacity, we investigated whether specific tests of executive function could predict balance function in a cohort of individuals with a history of chronic mild TBI (mTBI) and compared to individuals with a negative history of mTBI.
Secondary analysis was performed on the local LIMBIC-CENC cohort ( = 338, 259 mTBI, mean 45 ± STD 10 age). Static balance was assessed with the sensory organization test (SOT). Hierarchical regression was used for each EF test outcome using the following blocks: (1) the number of TBIs sustained, age, and sex; (2) the separate Trail making test (TMT); (3) anti-saccade eye tracking items (error, latency, and accuracy); (4) Oddball distractor stimulus P300 and N200 at PZ and FZ response; and (5) Oddball target stimulus P300 and N200 at PZ and FZ response.
The full model with all predictors accounted for between 15.2% and 21.5% of the variability in the balance measures. The number of TBI's) showed a negative association with the SOT2 score ( = 0.002). Additionally, longer times to complete TMT part B were shown to be related to a worse SOT1 score ( = 0.038). EEG distractors had the most influence on the SOT3 score ( = 0.019). Lastly, the SOT-composite and SOT5 scores were shown to be associated with longer inhibition latencies and errors (anti-saccade latency and error, = 0.026 and = 0.043 respectively).
These findings show that integration and re-weighting of sensory input when vision is occluded or corrupted is most related to EF. This indicates that combat-exposed Veterans and Service Members have greater problems when they need to differentiate between cues when vision is not a reliable input. In sum, these findings suggest that EF could be important for interpreting sensory information to identify balance challenges in chronic mTBI.
在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者中,姿势不稳常常长期存在,并带来诸如跌倒风险增加等不良后果。一种解释可能是有效处理、解释和整合感觉信息所需的执行功能(EF)下降。在其他人群中,高级认知功能的下降与行走和平衡技能的下降有关。考虑到执行功能下降与功能能力降低之间的联系,我们调查了执行功能的特定测试是否可以预测一组有慢性轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)病史的个体的平衡功能,并与无mTBI病史的个体进行比较。
对本地LIMBIC-CENC队列(n = 338,259例mTBI,平均年龄45±标准差10岁)进行二次分析。使用感觉组织测试(SOT)评估静态平衡。对每个执行功能测试结果使用分层回归,采用以下分组:(1)遭受的TBI次数、年龄和性别;(2)单独的连线测验(TMT);(3)反扫视眼动追踪项目(误差、潜伏期和准确性);(4)在PZ和FZ电极处对Oddball分心刺激的P300和N200反应;以及(5)在PZ和FZ电极处对Oddball目标刺激的P300和N200反应。
包含所有预测因素的完整模型解释了平衡测量中15.2%至21.5%的变异性。TBI次数与SOT2得分呈负相关(p = 0.002)。此外,完成TMT B部分的时间越长,SOT1得分越差(p = 0.038)。脑电图分心刺激对SOT3得分影响最大(p = 0.019)。最后,SOT综合得分和SOT5得分与更长的抑制潜伏期和误差相关(反扫视潜伏期和误差,分别为p = 0.026和p = 0.043)。
这些发现表明,当视觉被遮挡或受损时,感觉输入的整合和重新加权与执行功能最为相关。这表明经历过战斗的退伍军人和现役军人在视觉不是可靠输入时需要区分线索时会有更大的问题。总之,这些发现表明执行功能对于解释感觉信息以识别慢性mTBI中的平衡挑战可能很重要。