Capello Roberta, Caragliu Andrea, Panzera Elisa
ABC Department Politecnico di Milano Milan MI Italy.
Reg Sci Policy Prac. 2022 Oct 31. doi: 10.1111/rsp3.12590.
In Spring 2020, the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic hit Europe most severely. While empirical evidence regarding the economic costs of the strict lockdown measures enacted during the periods before the widespread diffusion of vaccines is now available, little is known about the economic impact of both strict lockdowns and partial closures on border regions. This is instead a relevant case study to analyze, in particular in the light of the asymmetric nature of border closures. This paper fills this gap and offers two sets of analyses: a first assessment of partial closures, enacted after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and based on the approach applied to European cross-border regions to measure the costs of legal and administrative barriers (Camagni et al., 2019); and a second measurement based on simulating the impacts of full closures with the Macroeconometric Social Sectoral Territorial (MASST)-4 model (Capello & Caragliu, 2021a). These analyses also allow for the pinpointing of the spatial distribution of economic losses, and to identify whether different regional typologies suffered the highest contraction.
2020年春季,第一波新冠疫情对欧洲造成了最严重的冲击。虽然现在已有关于在疫苗广泛普及之前实施的严格封锁措施所带来的经济成本的实证证据,但对于严格封锁和部分关闭措施对边境地区的经济影响却知之甚少。鉴于边境关闭的不对称性,这反而成为一个值得分析的相关案例研究。本文填补了这一空白,并提供了两组分析:第一组是对在第一波新冠疫情之后实施的部分关闭措施的评估,该评估基于应用于欧洲跨境地区以衡量法律和行政壁垒成本的方法(卡马吉等人,2019年);第二组是基于使用宏观计量社会部门地域(MASST)-4模型(卡佩洛和卡拉吉乌,2021年a)模拟完全关闭的影响进行的测量。这些分析还能够确定经济损失的空间分布,并识别不同区域类型是否遭受了最严重的收缩。