Suppr超能文献

CovidBChain:新冠疫情数据的访问控制、认证与完整性框架。

CovidBChain: Framework for access-control, authentication, and integrity of Covid-19 data.

作者信息

Pawar Vijayant, Sachdeva Shelly

机构信息

Department of Computer Science and Engineering National Institute of Technology Delhi Delhi India.

出版信息

Concurr Comput. 2022 Dec 25;34(28):e7397. doi: 10.1002/cpe.7397. Epub 2022 Oct 19.

Abstract

In the Covid-19 pandemic, information about the medical equipment such as personal protective equipment, ventilators, testing kits, oxygen cylinders, ICU beds, and patient diagnostic status is a black box for the patients. This article proposes a blockchain-assisted Covid-19 big data chain (CovidBChain) framework to handle the Covid-19 data, which is of colossal size (volume), coming from different sources (variety) and generated at every time instance (velocity). CovidBChain is proposed to protect electronic health records and Covid-19 equipment's information from illegal modification. CovidBChain provides transparency, access control, and integrity to Covid-19 data. The status of critical equipment like ventilator, Covid-19 beds, oxygen cylinder, and ICU status each such operation is integrated into the CovidBChain as a transaction. A prototype has been simulated using Ganache, Metamask, InterPlanetary File System, and Reactjs. The comparative assessment using proof-of-work (PoW) and proof-of-authority (PoA) deduces that the upload and retrieval time in PoA is less than PoW, while the transaction cost is more in PoW. The overhead of message exchange communication is reduced by a factor of in PoA as compared to the PoW approach. CovidBChain has been tested on the Ethereum official test network Ropsten for PoW and Goerli for PoA.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,对于患者来说,诸如个人防护装备、呼吸机、检测试剂盒、氧气瓶、重症监护病床等医疗设备的信息以及患者诊断状态都是一个黑匣子。本文提出了一种区块链辅助的新冠大数据链(CovidBChain)框架来处理新冠数据,这些数据规模巨大(体量)、来源各异(多样性)且每时每刻都在产生(速度)。提出CovidBChain是为了保护电子健康记录和新冠设备信息不被非法修改。CovidBChain为新冠数据提供透明度、访问控制和完整性。诸如呼吸机、新冠病床、氧气瓶等关键设备的状态以及每次此类操作的重症监护状态都作为交易集成到CovidBChain中。已使用Ganache、Metamask、星际文件系统和Reactjs模拟了一个原型。使用工作量证明(PoW)和权益证明(PoA)的对比评估得出,PoA中的上传和检索时间比PoW少,而PoW中的交易成本更高。与PoW方法相比,PoA中消息交换通信的开销减少了一个系数。CovidBChain已在以太坊官方测试网络Ropsten上针对PoW进行了测试,并在Goerli上针对PoA进行了测试。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Blockchain in Critical Care.重症监护中的区块链
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2025 Jun;29(6):525-530. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24991. Epub 2025 Jun 5.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验