Gisselquist Rachel M, Vaccaro Andrea
World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER) United Nations University Helsinki Finland.
Department of Economics University of Insubria Varese Italy.
J Int Dev. 2022 Oct 12. doi: 10.1002/jid.3702.
During the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic, it was wealthier countries with stronger institutions that suffered the highest numbers of cases and fatalities. Many weaker countries were instead praised for more effective pandemic response. What explains this seeming puzzle? We re-consider these relationships in the cross-country data, drawing on measures of the state, Covid's health impact and pandemic response. In brief, our analysis suggests that, when appropriate additional factors are taken into account, the expected relationship between state effectiveness and pandemic health outcomes in fact is clear. We also offer insight into how different dimensions of the state influence policy and outcomes and how particular countries compare with others.
在新冠疫情的第一年,机构更强大的富裕国家出现了最多的病例和死亡人数。许多实力较弱的国家反而因更有效的疫情应对措施而受到赞扬。如何解释这一看似矛盾的现象呢?我们利用国家状况、新冠疫情对健康的影响以及疫情应对措施的相关指标,重新审视了跨国数据中的这些关系。简而言之,我们的分析表明,当考虑到适当的其他因素时,国家有效性与疫情健康结果之间的预期关系实际上是清晰的。我们还深入探讨了国家的不同维度如何影响政策和结果,以及特定国家与其他国家相比情况如何。