• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学生参与策略在数据管理技能在线教学中的效果。

The effect of student engagement strategies in online instruction for data management skills.

作者信息

Xu Zhihong, Zhou Xuan, Watts John, Kogut Ashlynn

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communications, Texas A&M University, 77843 College Station, TX USA.

Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, 77843 College Station, TX USA.

出版信息

Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023 Jan 24:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11572-w.

DOI:10.1007/s10639-022-11572-w
PMID:36714439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9871430/
Abstract

Evaluating the effectiveness of teaching methods for synchronous online instruction is integral to fostering student engagement and maximizing student learning, particularly in one-time workshops or seminars. Using the lens of social constructivism theory, this study investigated the effect of different approaches of synchronous online instruction on the development of graduate students' research data management (RDM) skills during the post-pandemic era. One experimental group received teacher-centered instruction primarily via lecture and the second experimental group received student-centered instruction with active learning activities. A one-way ANCOVA was used to compare the post-test RDM scores between one control group and the two experimental groups, while controlling for the impact of their pre-test RDM scores. Both experimental groups who received online RDM instruction scored higher than participants from the control group who received no instruction. Additionally, our results indicated that learners who were exposed to more engaged and collaborative instruction demonstrated higher learning outcomes than students who received teacher-centered instruction. These findings suggest that interactive teaching that actively engages the audience is essential for successful synchronous online learning. Simply transferring a lecture-based approach to online teaching will not result in optimal student engagement and learning. The interactive online instructional strategies used in this study (e.g., collective note-taking, Google Jamboard activities) can be applied to any instructional content to engage learners and enhance student learning.

摘要

评估同步在线教学方法的有效性对于促进学生参与度和最大化学生学习效果至关重要,尤其是在一次性的工作坊或研讨会上。本研究从社会建构主义理论的角度出发,调查了后疫情时代不同同步在线教学方法对研究生研究数据管理(RDM)技能发展的影响。一个实验组主要通过讲座接受以教师为中心的教学,第二个实验组接受以学生为中心的教学并开展主动学习活动。使用单向协方差分析来比较一个对照组与两个实验组之间的测试后RDM分数,同时控制其测试前RDM分数的影响。接受在线RDM教学的两个实验组的得分均高于未接受教学的对照组参与者。此外,我们的结果表明,接触更多参与性和协作性教学的学习者比接受以教师为中心教学的学生表现出更高的学习成果。这些发现表明,积极吸引受众的互动式教学对于成功的同步在线学习至关重要。简单地将基于讲座的方法转移到在线教学中不会带来最佳的学生参与度和学习效果。本研究中使用的交互式在线教学策略(例如,集体记笔记、谷歌Jamboard活动)可应用于任何教学内容,以吸引学习者并提高学生的学习效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5b8/9871430/a8d4369202ed/10639_2022_11572_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5b8/9871430/4e88ab7a698a/10639_2022_11572_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5b8/9871430/a8d4369202ed/10639_2022_11572_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5b8/9871430/4e88ab7a698a/10639_2022_11572_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5b8/9871430/a8d4369202ed/10639_2022_11572_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of student engagement strategies in online instruction for data management skills.学生参与策略在数据管理技能在线教学中的效果。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023 Jan 24:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11572-w.
2
Blending Active Student Responding with Online Instruction to Evaluate Response Accuracy and Student Engagement.将主动式学生回应与在线教学相结合以评估回应准确性和学生参与度。
J Behav Educ. 2022 Nov 7:1-24. doi: 10.1007/s10864-022-09499-w.
3
Use of an Interactive Online Teaching Module Improved Students' Ability to Write a Clinically Appropriate SOAP Note.使用交互式在线教学模块提高了学生撰写临床适用的SOAP病历的能力。
J Vet Med Educ. 2020 Dec;47(6):700-708. doi: 10.3138/jvme.0918-107r. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
4
Pre-athletic training students perform better on written tests with teacher-centered instruction.进行运动前训练的学生在以教师为中心的书面测试中表现更好。
J Allied Health. 2004 Fall;33(3):200-4.
5
The impact of synchronous hybrid instruction on students' engagement in a pharmacotherapy course.同步混合式教学对学生参与药物治疗课程的影响。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2022 Jan-Mar;20(1):2611. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2022.1.2611. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
6
A tale of two instructional experiences: student engagement in active learning and emergency remote learning of biomechanics.两段教学经历的故事:主动学习和生物力学应急远程学习中学生的参与度。
Sports Biomech. 2023 Nov;22(11):1485-1495. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1810306. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
7
Online learning during COVID-19 produced equivalent or better student course performance as compared with pre-pandemic: empirical evidence from a school-wide comparative study.新冠疫情期间的在线学习与疫情前相比产生了相当或更好的学生课程表现:一项全校范围比较研究的实证证据。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Sep 16;21(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02909-z.
8
Student and faculty perceptions of effectiveness of online teaching modalities.学生和教师对在线教学模式有效性的看法。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Jan;120:105651. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105651. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
9
Evaluation of the effectiveness of student learning and teacher instruction on team-based learning during quality control of diagnostic imaging.在诊断影像学质量控制中,基于团队学习的学生学习和教师教学效果评价。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1732159. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1732159.
10
Teacher-Student Interaction, Student-Student Interaction and Social Presence: Their Impacts on Learning Engagement in Online Learning Environments.师生互动、生生互动与社会临场感:它们对在线学习环境中学习参与度的影响
J Genet Psychol. 2022 Nov-Dec;183(6):514-526. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2022.2094211. Epub 2022 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Flipping it online: re-imagining teaching search skills for knowledge syntheses.将其翻转到线上:重新构想用于知识综合的搜索技能教学。
J Can Health Libr Assoc. 2021 Aug 1;42(2):100-109. doi: 10.29173/jchla29492. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
The impact of synchronous hybrid instruction on students' engagement in a pharmacotherapy course.同步混合式教学对学生参与药物治疗课程的影响。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2022 Jan-Mar;20(1):2611. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2022.1.2611. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
3
Active methodologies association with online learning fatigue among medical students.
医学生在线学习疲劳与主动学习方法的关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb 1;22(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03143-x.
4
Google Jamboard for virtual anatomy education.用于虚拟解剖学教育的谷歌Jamboard。
Clin Teach. 2021 Aug;18(4):341-347. doi: 10.1111/tct.13389. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
5
A model for initiating research data management services at academic libraries.学术图书馆开展研究数据管理服务的模型。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Jul;107(3):432-441. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.545. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
6
A two-tiered curriculum to improve data management practices for researchers.为研究人员设计的两级课程,以提高数据管理实践水平。
PLoS One. 2019 May 1;14(5):e0215509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215509. eCollection 2019.
7
Developing and communicating responsible data management policies to trainees and colleagues.为学员和同事制定并传达负责任的数据管理政策。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Dec;16(4):753-62. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9219-1. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
8
The use of unequal randomisation ratios in clinical trials: a review.临床试验中不等随机化比例的应用:一项综述。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2006 Feb;27(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2005.08.003. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
9
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.内在动机与外在动机:经典定义与新方向
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):54-67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.