Suppr超能文献

印度国家首都地区一家三级护理医院医护人员中新冠病毒感染的血清流行率:一项研究

Seroprevalence of Covid-19 infection among healthcare workers: A study from a tertiary care hospital in the National Capital Region of India.

作者信息

Kataria Sushila, Phogat Rashmi, Sharma Pooja, Deswal Vikas, Alam Sazid, Singh Manish, Kumar Kuldeep, Gupta Vaibhav, Singh Padam, Dutt Rohit, Sarma Smita, Saxena Renu, Trehan Naresh

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Medanta-The Medicity, Sector-38, Gurugram 122001, Haryana, India.

Department of Microbiology, Medanta-The Medicity, Sector-38, Gurugram 122001, Haryana, India.

出版信息

Natl Med J India. 2022 Jul-Aug;35(4):219-220. doi: 10.25259/NMJI_345_21.

Abstract

Background Seroprevalence studies on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection can provide information on the target populations for vaccination. We aimed to evaluate the seroprevalence among healthcare workers (HCWs) at our tertiary care institution and to identify parameters that may affect it. Method We assessed seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 by the chemiluminescence immunoassay test among 3258 HCW in our hospital and evaluated as per gender, age, their previous Covid-19 diagnosis, role in hospital and type/risk of exposure. Results Of 3258 participants, 46.2% (95% CI 44.4%- 47.9%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies (i.e. IgG ≥15 AU/ml). Higher seroprevalence was seen in non-clinical HCWs (50.2%) than in clinical HCWs (41.4%, p=0.0001). Furthermore, people with a history of Covid-19 were found to have significantly higher antibody levels (p=0.0001). Among the HCWs, doctors and nurses had lower relative risk (RR) of acquiring Covid-19 infection (RR=0.82; 95% CI 0.76-0.89) compared to non-clinical HCWs. Conclusion Seroprevalence in HCWs at our hospital was 46.2%. Clinical HCWs had lower seroprevalence compared to non-clinical HCWs. Previous history of Covid-19 almost doubled the seropositivity, particularly in those with current infection.

摘要

背景 关于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的血清流行率研究可为疫苗接种目标人群提供信息。我们旨在评估我们三级医疗机构中医护人员(HCW)的血清流行率,并确定可能影响其的参数。方法 我们通过化学发光免疫分析试验评估了我院3258名医护人员中SARS-CoV-2的血清流行率,并根据性别、年龄、他们之前的新冠病毒病诊断、在医院中的角色以及接触类型/风险进行了评估。结果 在3258名参与者中,46.2%(95%置信区间44.4%-47.9%)的SARS-CoV-2 IgG抗体呈阳性(即IgG≥15 AU/ml)。非临床医护人员的血清流行率(50.2%)高于临床医护人员(41.4%,p=0.0001)。此外,有新冠病毒病病史的人抗体水平明显更高(p=0.0001)。在医护人员中,医生和护士感染新冠病毒病的相对风险(RR)低于非临床医护人员(RR=0.82;95%置信区间0.76-0.89)。结论 我院医护人员的血清流行率为46.2%。与非临床医护人员相比,临床医护人员的血清流行率较低。新冠病毒病既往史使血清阳性率几乎翻倍,尤其是在目前感染的人群中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验