• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士对患者的了解程度如何?患者的担忧程度与护士对患者担忧程度的估计之间的一致性——一项观察性研究。

How well do nurses know their patients? Agreement between patients' degree-of-worry and nurses' estimation of patients' degree-of-worry-An observational study.

机构信息

Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2023 Sep;37(3):654-661. doi: 10.1111/scs.13147. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1111/scs.13147
PMID:36715060
Abstract

AIM

To assess the agreement between patients' self-reported degree-of-worry (DOW) and nurses' evaluation of patients' DOW.

DESIGN

An observational cohort study with patients and their primary nurses.

METHODS

Between 22 February and 27 March 2021, data collection among patients and their nurses in an emergency department was carried out. Patients ≥18 years, cognitively intact and Danish or English speaking were eligible to participate. Nurses regardless of seniority and gender were eligible for participation. The single-item degree-of-worry measure, 'how worried are you about the condition you are here today on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is minimally worried and 10 is maximum worried' as well as information on gender, age, co-morbidity, triage level and medical reason for encounter was collected from patients. The corresponding nurses were asked; 'how worried do you think your patient is about the condition he/she is there today on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is minimally worried and 10 is maximum worried?' Nurses also supplied data on gender, age, seniority as a Registered Nurse and in the ED. Agreement between patients' self-reported degree-of-worry and nurses' evaluation of patients' degree-of-worry was assessed with weighted Cohen's Kappa.

RESULTS

A total of 194 patient-nurse pairs were included for analysis. The agreement between patients' DOW and nurses' evaluation of patients' DOW categorised as DOW , DOW and DOW was in total agreement in n = 85 pairs (43.8%) of the ratings, which corresponds to a weighted Cohen's Kappa of 0.19 (0.08-0.30; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Nurses estimate of their patients' DOW was in very poor agreement. This indicates that nurses are not able to assess the patient's DOW to a satisfactory level. This result is troubling as it may have serious consequences for patient care as it indicates that the nurses do not know their patients' perspectives.

摘要

目的

评估患者自我报告的担忧程度(DOW)与护士对患者 DOW 的评估之间的一致性。

设计

一项对患者及其主管护士进行的观察性队列研究。

方法

2021 年 2 月 22 日至 3 月 27 日期间,在急诊科对患者及其护士进行了数据收集。年龄≥18 岁、认知正常、会说丹麦语或英语的患者符合纳入标准。不论资历和性别,护士均符合参与条件。从患者处收集了单一的担忧程度测量项目“您对今天在这里的病情有多担心,范围从 1 到 10,其中 1 表示最小程度的担心,10 表示最大程度的担心”以及性别、年龄、合并症、分诊级别和就诊原因等信息。主管护士则被要求回答:“您认为您的患者对他/她今天的病情有多担心,范围从 1 到 10,其中 1 表示最小程度的担心,10 表示最大程度的担心?”护士还提供了性别、年龄、作为注册护士的资历以及在急诊科的资历等数据。使用加权 Cohen's Kappa 评估患者自我报告的担忧程度与护士对患者担忧程度的评估之间的一致性。

结果

共纳入了 194 对患者-护士进行了分析。患者 DOW 和护士对患者 DOW 的评估分类为 DOW 、 DOW 和 DOW ,在 n=85 对评分中完全一致(占总评分的 43.8%),加权 Cohen's Kappa 为 0.19(0.08-0.30;p<0.001)。

结论

护士对患者 DOW 的评估与非常不一致。这表明护士无法对患者的 DOW 进行令人满意的评估。这个结果令人不安,因为它可能对患者护理产生严重后果,表明护士不知道患者的观点。

相似文献

1
How well do nurses know their patients? Agreement between patients' degree-of-worry and nurses' estimation of patients' degree-of-worry-An observational study.护士对患者的了解程度如何?患者的担忧程度与护士对患者担忧程度的估计之间的一致性——一项观察性研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2023 Sep;37(3):654-661. doi: 10.1111/scs.13147. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
4
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
5
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
6
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
8
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
9
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.
10
Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care.护士在初级保健中替代医生的角色。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 16;7(7):CD001271. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001271.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation between illness perceptions and self-reported degree-of-worry in somatic ill patients in emergency care: a Danish cross-sectional study.急诊躯体疾病患者的疾病认知与自我报告担忧程度的相关性:一项丹麦横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 1;14(10):e089595. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089595.