St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.
Br J Dermatol. 2023 May 24;188(6):718-725. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljac116.
We live in exciting times in atopic dermatitis therapeutics, with many novel treatments in the clinical trial pipeline. Frustratingly, most of these trials are vehicle- or placebo-controlled, rather than head-to-head comparisons. Network meta-analyses can rank treatments against each other, even for placebo-controlled studies, aiding evidence-based guideline formulation and clinical decision-making. Treatment registries are an important additional vehicle to collect 'real-world' data on the long-term (cost) effectiveness and safety of the new drugs, outside of the stringent and short-term settings of clinical trials. As further agents enter clinical practice, the need for biomarkers of treatment response and drug safety becomes more pressing to move us towards personalized medicine and to avoid wasting healthcare resources. This review takes stock of our current treatment armamentarium for atopic dermatitis, highlights important gaps in our knowledge - including the relatively low number of studies conducted in children - and maps out how our treatment approaches for atopic dermatitis can become more targeted and holistic in the future.
我们正处于特应性皮炎治疗的激动人心时代,许多新的治疗方法正在临床试验阶段。令人沮丧的是,这些试验大多数是安慰剂对照或载体对照,而不是头对头比较。网络荟萃分析可以对治疗方法进行相互排序,即使是安慰剂对照研究也可以这样做,从而有助于制定基于证据的指南和临床决策。治疗登记处是一种重要的补充手段,可以在临床试验严格且短期的环境之外,收集新药物长期(成本)有效性和安全性的“真实世界”数据。随着更多的药物进入临床实践,对治疗反应和药物安全性的生物标志物的需求变得更加迫切,这有助于我们迈向个体化医疗,并避免浪费医疗保健资源。本综述评估了我们目前治疗特应性皮炎的方法,强调了我们知识中的重要差距,包括在儿童中进行的研究相对较少,并规划了我们未来如何使特应性皮炎的治疗方法更加有针对性和整体性。