Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 69 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive SE, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
Department of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2023 Dec;30(4):791-803. doi: 10.1007/s10880-023-09941-9. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
The properties and utility of the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) remain unstudied in community-based populations. This study evaluates the performance of the PC-PTSD-5 to determine whether it can be used as a brief alternative to the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) in a large public hospital in the southeastern United States. Participants (N = 422; 92.7% Black; 85.8% female; M = 42.0 years, SD = 13.4 years) completed the PCL-5 and PC-PTSD-5 after recruitment from medical clinic waiting rooms and admission lists. Using chance-corrected test quality indices and item response theory (IRT) analyses, we determined optimal cut-scores for screening and examined item performance. Approximately 45.0% of the sample screened positive for probable DSM-5 PTSD using the PCL-5. The PC-PTSD-5 demonstrated high internal consistency and strong associations with PCL-5 scores (total, r = .79; items, rs = .51-.61). A cut-score of one was optimally sensitive for screening (κ[1] = .96), and a cut-score of four had the highest quality of probable efficiency (κ[.5] = .66) for detecting self-reported DSM-5 PTSD on the PCL-5. IRT analyses indicated Item 1 (nightmares, intrusive memories) provided the most information, and other items may not be incrementally useful for this sample. Findings provide preliminary support for the use of the PC-PTSD-5 as a brief alternative to the PCL-5 among chronically trauma-exposed patients in the public healthcare setting.
《DSM-5 基础医疗 PTSD 筛查表》(PC-PTSD-5)在社区人群中的特性和实用性尚未得到研究。本研究旨在评估 PC-PTSD-5 的性能,以确定其是否可作为美国东南部一家大型公立医院中 PTSD 检查表(PCL-5)的简短替代方法。参与者(N=422;92.7%为黑人;85.8%为女性;M=42.0 岁,SD=13.4 岁)在从医疗诊所候诊室和入院名单招募后完成了 PCL-5 和 PC-PTSD-5。我们使用校正机遇的测试质量指数和项目反应理论(IRT)分析,确定了筛查的最佳截断分数,并检查了项目表现。使用 PCL-5,约 45.0%的样本筛查出患有 DSM-5 PTSD 的可能性较高。PC-PTSD-5 表现出较高的内部一致性和与 PCL-5 评分的强相关性(总分,r=.79;项目,rs=.51-.61)。分数为 1 的截断值对筛查最敏感(κ[1]=.96),而分数为 4 的截断值对 PCL-5 上自我报告的 DSM-5 PTSD 具有最高的可能效率质量(κ[.5]=.66)。IRT 分析表明,项目 1(噩梦、侵入性记忆)提供了最多的信息,其他项目对于该样本可能没有额外的用处。研究结果初步支持在公共医疗环境中,将 PC-PTSD-5 作为 PCL-5 的简短替代方法,用于慢性创伤暴露患者。