Retrospective analysis of nurse-administered fall assessment scales in the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit.

INTRODUCTION

Inpatient falls within the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) are a common, and potentially preventable adverse event contributing to morbidity for patients living with epilepsy. Accurate fall risk screening is important to identify and efficiently allocate proper safety measures to high-risk patients, especially in EMUs with limited resources. We sought to compare existing screening tools for the ability to predict falls in the EMU.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center, case-controlled, comparative analysis of 7 nurse-administered fall risk assessment tools (NAFRAT) of patients admitted to the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) EMU. Analysis of categorical data was compared using chi-square analysis while quantitative distributions were compared using student's t-test.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patient records (28 falls and 28 controls) were included in the analysis. Epilepsy Monitoring Unit falls were most common within the first 3 days of admission (p = .0094). Pre-admission documentation of falls was a strong predictor of falls within the EMU (p < .0001). Epilepsy Monitoring Unit falls were associated with documented falls after EMU discharge (p = .011). The John Hopkins fall risk assessment tool (JHFRAT) accurately stratified fall risk in the fall group compared to the control (p = .008), however, none of the 7 NAFRATs demonstrated significant categorical differences among the epilepsy subgroups. There was a significant difference in the distribution of quantitative scores, higher in the fall group according to the Morse Fall Scale (MFS) (p = 0.012), JHFRAT (p = 0.003), Schmid Fall Risk Assessment Scale (p = 0.029) and Hester-Davis Scale (p = 0.049). The modified Conley (p = 0.03) and Morse scale (p = 0.025) demonstrated differences in the distribution of quantitative scores in the epilepsy subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study demonstrate variable accuracy of NAFRATs in assessing fall risk among patients admitted to the EMU, particularly among patients with epilepsy. The findings underscore the need for a validated, EMU-specific, fall assessment tool that accurately stratifies fall risk and inform efficient use of patient-specific fall prevention resources and protocols.