• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拷贝数变异的不确定性:妊娠决策和临床随访。

The uncertainty of copy number variants: pregnancy decisions and clinical follow-up.

机构信息

Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Genetics and Precision Medicine Centre, First People's Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, China.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug;229(2):170.e1-170.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.022. Epub 2023 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.022
PMID:36716986
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Next-generation sequencing for copy number variants is often used as a follow-up investigation of unusual fetal ultrasound results and is capable of detecting copy number variations with a resolution of ∼0.1 Mb. In a prenatal setting, observation and subsequent management of pregnancies with a fetal variant of uncertain significance remains problematic for counseling.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to follow the decision-making processes in pregnancies with a fetal variant of uncertain significance and prospectively assess copy number variation interpretations and implications under the newer 2020 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines.

STUDY DESIGN

In a single prenatal unit, prospective chromosome testing using copy number variation sequencing for 8030 fetuses with unexpected noninvasive findings identified 139 pregnancies with a copy number variation classified as a variant of uncertain significance according to the 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines current at the time. Parent-of-origin testing was subsequently performed to determine if the copy number variation was inherited or de novo. All couples were offered specialized genetic counseling to assist in pregnancy management decisions. For the continued pregnancies that reached term, newborns were clinically assessed for evidence of any disease at 0 to 10 months and/or at 2 to 4 years of age.

RESULTS

Of the 139 variants of uncertain significance found, most (78%) were inherited with no evidence of disease in the carrier parent. On the basis of primary ultrasound findings combined with results from noninvasive prenatal screening tests, most inherited variant of uncertain significance pregnancies were continued, whereas most pregnancies involving de novo variants of uncertain significance were terminated. From clinical follow-up of the 113 live births, only 5 showed any evidence of a phenotype that was not apparently related to the original variant of uncertain significance. Prospective reanalysis of the 139 variants of uncertain significance using recent 2020 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines changed the status of 24 variants of uncertain significance, with 15 reclassified as benign and 9 as pathogenic. However, the 5 children born with an inherited variant of uncertain significance reclassified as pathogenic showed no evidence of a disease phenotype on clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The severity of fetal ultrasound findings combined with results from parent-of-origin testing were the key drivers in pregnancy management decisions for patients. According to birth outcomes from continued pregnancies, most variants of uncertain significance proved to be apparently benign in nature and potentially of low risk of adverse disease outcome. There was a discordance rate of 17% for variant of uncertain significance scoring between the 2015 and 2020 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines for defining a variant of uncertain significance, suggesting that difficulties remain for predicting true pathogenicity. Nonetheless, with increasing knowledge of population copy number variation polymorphisms, and a more complete assessment for alternative genetic causes, patients having prenatal assessments should feel less anxious when a fetal variant of uncertain significance is identified.

摘要

背景

下一代测序技术常用于检测异常胎儿超声结果,并能够以约 0.1 Mb 的分辨率检测拷贝数变异。在产前环境中,对于具有不确定意义的胎儿变异的观察和随后的妊娠管理仍然是咨询的难题。

目的

本研究旨在跟踪具有不确定意义的胎儿变异妊娠的决策过程,并根据较新的 2020 年美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院指南,前瞻性评估拷贝数变异解释及其影响。

研究设计

在一个单一的产前单位,对 8030 例具有意外非侵入性发现的胎儿进行基于拷贝数变异测序的前瞻性染色体检测,发现 139 例拷贝数变异被归类为不确定意义的变异,根据当时的 2015 年美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院指南。随后进行亲本来源检测以确定拷贝数变异是遗传的还是新发的。所有夫妇都接受了专门的遗传咨询,以帮助做出妊娠管理决策。对于继续妊娠并达到足月的孕妇,对新生儿在 0 至 10 个月和/或 2 至 4 岁时进行临床评估,以寻找任何疾病的证据。

结果

在发现的 139 个不确定意义的变异中,大多数(78%)是遗传的,携带者父母没有疾病证据。基于主要超声发现以及非侵入性产前筛查试验的结果,大多数具有不确定意义的遗传妊娠被继续,而大多数涉及新发不确定意义的变异妊娠被终止。从 113 例活产儿的临床随访中,只有 5 例出现了与原始不确定意义的变异无关的明显表型证据。使用最近的 2020 年美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院指南对 139 个不确定意义的变异进行前瞻性重新分析,改变了 24 个不确定意义的变异的状态,其中 15 个重新分类为良性,9 个为致病性。然而,在重新分类为致病性的 5 例具有遗传不确定意义的变异的儿童中,在临床随访中没有发现疾病表型的证据。

结论

胎儿超声发现的严重程度结合亲本来源检测的结果是患者妊娠管理决策的关键驱动因素。根据继续妊娠的分娩结局,大多数不确定意义的变异本质上似乎是良性的,潜在的不良疾病结局风险较低。在 2015 年和 2020 年美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院指南中,用于定义不确定意义的变异的不确定意义变异评分之间存在 17%的差异率,这表明预测真正的致病性仍然存在困难。尽管如此,随着对人群拷贝数变异多态性认识的不断增加,以及对替代遗传原因的更全面评估,当发现胎儿不确定意义的变异时,进行产前评估的患者应该会感到不那么焦虑。

相似文献

1
The uncertainty of copy number variants: pregnancy decisions and clinical follow-up.拷贝数变异的不确定性:妊娠决策和临床随访。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug;229(2):170.e1-170.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.022. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
2
Prospective chromosome analysis of 3429 amniocentesis samples in China using copy number variation sequencing.使用拷贝数变异测序对中国 3429 例羊水穿刺样本进行前瞻性染色体分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;219(3):287.e1-287.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 May 29.
3
Dilemmas in genetic counseling for low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci detected on prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis.产前染色体微阵列分析检测到低外显率神经易感性基因座的遗传咨询困境。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):247.e1-247.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.559. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
4
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for copy number variants of uncertain significance (CNV- VUS) in the genomic era: to do or not to do?植入前遗传学检测(PGT)在基因组时代对意义未明的拷贝数变异(CNV-VUS):做还是不做?
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Mar;38(3):719-725. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-02055-3. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
5
Clinical application of targeted next-generation sequencing in fetuses with congenital heart defect.靶向二代测序在先天性心脏病胎儿中的临床应用。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;52(2):205-211. doi: 10.1002/uog.19042. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
6
Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study.超声检查发现胎儿结构畸形的产前外显子组测序分析(PAGE):一项队列研究。
Lancet. 2019 Feb 23;393(10173):747-757. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31940-8. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
7
Whole-genome sequencing in prenatally detected congenital malformations: prospective cohort study in clinical setting.产前检测到的先天性畸形的全基因组测序:临床环境中的前瞻性队列研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 May;63(5):658-663. doi: 10.1002/uog.27592. Epub 2024 Apr 14.
8
Utility of trio-based prenatal exome sequencing incorporating splice-site and mitochondrial genome assessment in pregnancies with fetal ultrasound anomalies: prospective cohort study.基于三探针的产前外显子组测序结合剪接位点和线粒体基因组评估在胎儿超声异常妊娠中的应用:前瞻性队列研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec;60(6):780-792. doi: 10.1002/uog.24974.
9
Should prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis be offered for isolated fetal growth restriction? A French multicenter study.是否应提供产前染色体微阵列分析用于孤立性胎儿生长受限?一项法国多中心研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec;225(6):676.e1-676.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.035. Epub 2021 May 29.
10
Residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants in low-risk pregnancies, following exclusion of noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings.在排除了无创产前筛查可检测到的结果后,低风险妊娠中临床显著拷贝数变异的残留风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;226(4):562.e1-562.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.016. Epub 2021 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Complementary role of echocardiography, karyotyping, and chromosomal microarray in congenital cardiac anomalies.超声心动图、核型分析和染色体微阵列在先天性心脏畸形中的互补作用。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 29;12:1586161. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1586161. eCollection 2025.
2
Prenatal Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS): to report or not to report?产前意义未明的变异(VUS):报告还是不报告?
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01924-8.
3
Evaluating pregnancy termination rates for fetal chromosome and single gene disorders.
评估胎儿染色体和单基因疾病的终止妊娠率。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70099. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70099.
4
Parent-of-origin testing of prenatal copy number variations: a retrospective study of 167 family cases.产前拷贝数变异的亲源检测:167例家族病例的回顾性研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 18;15(1):5979. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86487-w.
5
Incremental yield of prenatal exome sequencing in fetuses with skeletal system abnormalities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.骨骼系统异常胎儿产前外显子组测序的增量收益:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Apr;104(4):604-614. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15025. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
6
Detection of genomic variants by genome sequencing in foetuses with central nervous system abnormalities.通过对中枢神经系统异常胎儿的基因组测序检测基因组变异。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2399317. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2399317. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
7
Perinatal outcomes after a prenatal diagnosis of a fetal copy number variant: a retrospective population-based cohort study.产前诊断胎儿拷贝数变异后的围产儿结局:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Aug 22;24(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05012-6.
8
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Fetuses with Ultrasound Abnormalities.超声异常胎儿的染色体微阵列分析
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Aug 15;17:3531-3540. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S472906. eCollection 2024.
9
Chromosome Microarray Analysis and Exome Sequencing: Implementation in Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetuses with Digestive System Malformations.染色体微阵列分析和外显子组测序:在消化系统畸形胎儿产前诊断中的应用。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Sep 26;14(10):1872. doi: 10.3390/genes14101872.