• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究方案:CREDO 随机对照试验:评估一种结构化的患者回家咨询对转移性癌症患者的效果。

Study protocol of the CREDO randomised controlled trial: evaluation of a structured return home consultation for patients suffering from metastaticcancer.

机构信息

Département Universitaire de Médecine Générale - Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France

UMR 1295 INSERM - Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 30;13(1):e062219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062219.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062219
PMID:36717134
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9887714/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients suffering from cancer are often managed by multiple health professionals. General practitioners with specific skills in oncology could facilitate care coordination between hospital and general practice in the management of these patients. To explore this hypothesis, we run a randomised clinical trial, called 'Concertation de REtour à DOmicile, CREDO'. The main objective is to explore the effectiveness of a 'return home' consultation compared with standard care. The number of unscheduled visits to care centres is used to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

CREDO is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, prospective trial. It takes place in two specialised cancer care centres in southern France (Occitania region). Patient inclusion criteria are: be over 18 years old; be treated with a first cycle of metastatic chemotherapy in a specialised cancer care centre; have a metastatic solid cancer and be returning home after treatment. Patients are randomised in two arms: standard-arm (conventional management) or intervention-arm (CREDO management). In the intervention arm, a 'return home' consultation is carried out in three steps. First, the investigating GP (GP with specific skills in oncology) from the specialised care centre collects information about the patient and patient's management choices. Then, the investigating GP conducts an interview with the patient's referring GP to quickly communicate and discuss information about the patient. Finally, the investigating GP summarises these exchanges and transmits this information to the care centres chosen by the patient.All the patients are followed for 1 year.Statistical and medicoeconomic analysis are planned.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This clinical trial is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier and was approved by the ethics committee of South-Western French Committee for the Protection of Persons (number: 2016-A01587-44) and from the French National Drug Safety Agency (ANSM, number: 2016111500034).An international publication of the final results and conference presentations will be planned.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02857400.

摘要

简介

癌症患者通常由多名医疗保健专业人员共同管理。具有肿瘤学专业技能的全科医生可以促进医院和全科医生之间在这些患者管理方面的护理协调。为了探索这一假设,我们开展了一项名为“Concertation de REtour à DOmicile,CREDO”的随机临床试验。主要目的是探索“回家”咨询与标准护理相比的有效性。未预约就诊次数用于评估治疗效果。

方法与分析

CREDO 是一项多中心、随机、开放标签、前瞻性试验。该试验在法国南部两个专门的癌症护理中心(奥克西塔尼地区)进行。患者入选标准为:年龄超过 18 岁;正在专门的癌症护理中心接受转移性化疗的首个周期治疗;患有转移性实体瘤,并在治疗后返回家中。患者被随机分为两组:标准组(常规治疗)或干预组(CREDO 治疗)。在干预组中,进行了三步“回家”咨询。首先,来自专门护理中心的调查全科医生(具有肿瘤学专业技能的全科医生)收集有关患者和患者管理选择的信息。然后,调查全科医生与患者的转诊全科医生进行访谈,以快速交流和讨论有关患者的信息。最后,调查全科医生总结这些交流并将这些信息传递给患者选择的护理中心。所有患者均随访 1 年。计划进行统计和医疗经济学分析。

伦理与传播

该临床试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符下注册,并获得了法国西南地区保护人员伦理委员会(编号:2016-A01587-44)和法国国家药物安全局(编号:2016111500034)的批准。计划对最终结果进行国际发表和会议报告。

试验注册号

NCT02857400。

相似文献

1
Study protocol of the CREDO randomised controlled trial: evaluation of a structured return home consultation for patients suffering from metastaticcancer.研究方案:CREDO 随机对照试验:评估一种结构化的患者回家咨询对转移性癌症患者的效果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 30;13(1):e062219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062219.
2
Effect of dexamethasone in patients with ARDS and COVID-19 - prospective, multi-centre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (REMED trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.地塞米松治疗 ARDS 合并 COVID-19 患者的效果 - 一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、平行组、随机对照试验(REMED 试验):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Mar 1;22(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05116-9.
3
Home Treatment of Older People with Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19): A structured Summary of a Study Protocol for a Multi-Arm Multi-Stage (MAMS) Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Several Experimental Treatments to Reduce the Risk of Hospitalisation or Death in outpatients aged 65 years or older (COVERAGE trial).老年人伴有症状的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型感染(COVID-19)的家庭治疗:一项多臂多阶段(MAMS)随机试验研究方案的结构化总结,旨在评估几种实验性治疗方法在降低 65 岁及以上门诊患者住院或死亡风险方面的疗效和耐受性(COVERAGE 试验)。
Trials. 2020 Oct 13;21(1):846. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04619-1.
4
A Randomized Open label Phase-II Clinical Trial with or without Infusion of Plasma from Subjects after Convalescence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in High-Risk Patients with Confirmed Severe SARS-CoV-2 Disease (RECOVER): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项针对高风险确诊严重 SARS-CoV-2 疾病患者的随机开放标签 II 期临床试验,比较 SARS-CoV-2 感染后恢复期患者输注血浆与未输注血浆的疗效(RECOVER):一项随机对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 6;21(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04735-y.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
6
Efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide plus atazanavir/ritonavir for the treatment of moderate to severe COVID-19 (NACOVID): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.尼他唑胺联合阿扎那韦/利托那韦治疗中重度 COVID-19(NACOVID)的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 4;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04987-8.
7
Testing the efficacy and safety of BIO101, for the prevention of respiratory deterioration, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVA study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估 BIO101 预防 COVID-19 肺炎患者呼吸恶化的疗效和安全性(COVA 研究):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04998-5.
8
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial to evaluate the efficacy of baricitinib to prevent respiratory insufficiency progression in onco-hematological patients affected with COVID19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估巴瑞替尼预防 COVID19 相关血液肿瘤患者呼吸功能不全进展的疗效的 I/II 期临床试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Feb 5;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05072-4.
9
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (inactivated, Vero cell): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗(灭活,Vero 细胞)有效性和安全性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照 III 期临床试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 13;22(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05180-1.
10
Controlled, double-blind, randomized trial to assess the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine chemoprophylaxis in SARS CoV2 infection in healthcare personnel in the hospital setting: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.在医院环境中评估羟氯喹化学预防 SARS-CoV2 感染在医护人员中的疗效和安全性的对照、双盲、随机试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04400-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Inventory of tools for care coordination between general practice and hospital system for patients suffering from cancer in active phase of treatment: A scoping review.癌症治疗活跃期患者的全科医疗与医院系统之间的护理协调工具清单:范围综述。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2020 Nov;29(6):e13319. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13319. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
2
Guideline sheets on the side effects of anticancer drugs are useful for general practitioners.抗癌药物副作用指南对全科医生很有用。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Dec;23(12):3473-80. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2705-x. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
3
Care coordination measures of a family medicine residency as a model for hospital readmission reduction.家庭医学住院医师培训项目的照护协调措施作为降低医院再入院率的一种模式
Am J Manag Care. 2014 Nov 1;20(11):e532-4.
4
Bridging the gap between primary care and the cancer system: the UPCON Network of CancerCare Manitoba.弥合初级保健与癌症系统之间的差距:曼尼托巴癌症护理UPCON网络。
Can Fam Physician. 2009 Mar;55(3):273-8.
5
A simple method of sample size calculation for linear and logistic regression.一种用于线性回归和逻辑回归的样本量计算的简单方法。
Stat Med. 1998 Jul 30;17(14):1623-34. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980730)17:14<1623::aid-sim871>3.0.co;2-s.
6
Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation.通过自助法提升成本效益分析:一种用于置信区间估计的非参数方法。
Health Econ. 1997 Jul-Aug;6(4):327-40. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199707)6:4<327::aid-hec282>3.0.co;2-w.
7
Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden.受损老年人的亲属:负担感的相关因素。
Gerontologist. 1980 Dec;20(6):649-55. doi: 10.1093/geront/20.6.649.
8
Progress in development of the index of ADL.日常生活活动能力指数的发展进展。
Gerontologist. 1970 Spring;10(1):20-30. doi: 10.1093/geront/10.1_part_1.20.
9
Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living.老年人评估:日常生活中的自我维持和工具性活动
Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86.