• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定和优先考虑联合健康专业人员和心理治疗师的质量改进网络的关键组成部分:一个团体概念映射项目。

Identifying and prioritising the key components of a Quality Improvement Network for allied health professionals and psychological therapists: a group concept mapping project.

机构信息

Rehabilitation Department, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK

Rehabilitation Department, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jan;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002039.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002039
PMID:36717182
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9887700/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite growing enthusiasm for quality improvement (QI), the complexities of modern healthcare continue to create gaps in our ability to consistently deliver the most effective and efficient care for patients, and improvement activities often fail to achieve widespread uptake even when there is robust evidence of their benefits.

METHODS

We undertook a novel, mixed methods evaluation and planning project using group concept mapping (GCM) methodology to identify and prioritise the ways in which our recently established Quality Improvement Network (QIN) could support allied health professionals, psychological therapists and administrative staff in their daily work to improve patient outcomes and experience. Mid-level leaders across our therapy services department contributed towards a statement generation activity and individually sorted these statements into themes. Each statement was rated for perceived importance and current success. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were applied to the sorted data to produce themed clusters of ideas within concept maps. Priority values were applied to these maps to identify key areas for future QIN activity.

RESULTS

Overall, 34 participants took part in ideas generation, 20 in sorting and 30 in the rating activity. A five-item cluster map was agreed on, containing the following named clusters: data support; practical skills and training; time and resources; embedding a QI culture; and sharing ideas and working together. Statements contained within each of the five clusters highlight the importance of supporting a range of activities spanning the technical and human aspects of QI at an individual, group/team, organisation and wider systems level.

CONCLUSION

GCM provided a structured and systematic approach for identifying the perceived support needs of allied health professionals, psychological therapists and administrative support staff in relation to QI. The findings from this project provide a useful benchmark from which to track targeted QI support in an applied healthcare setting.

摘要

简介

尽管人们对质量改进(QI)越来越感兴趣,但现代医疗保健的复杂性仍然导致我们在为患者提供最有效和最有效的护理方面存在差距,而且即使有确凿的证据证明改进活动的益处,这些活动也往往未能广泛采用。

方法

我们采用了一种新颖的混合方法评估和规划项目,使用群体概念映射(GCM)方法来确定和优先考虑我们最近成立的质量改进网络(QIN)如何支持联合健康专业人员、心理治疗师和行政人员在日常工作中改善患者的结果和体验。我们的治疗服务部门的中层领导参与了一个陈述生成活动,并将这些陈述单独分类为主题。每个陈述都被评定为感知的重要性和当前的成功。多维标度和层次聚类分析被应用于排序数据,以在概念图中生成主题思想簇。优先级值被应用于这些地图,以确定未来 QIN 活动的关键领域。

结果

共有 34 名参与者参与了想法生成,20 名参与者参与了分类,30 名参与者参与了评分活动。同意了一个包含五个项目的聚类图,其中包含以下命名聚类:数据支持;实用技能和培训;时间和资源;嵌入 QI 文化;以及分享想法和共同工作。每个聚类中的陈述强调了支持一系列活动的重要性,这些活动涵盖了 QI 的技术和人为方面,涉及个人、小组/团队、组织和更广泛的系统层面。

结论

GCM 为确定联合健康专业人员、心理治疗师和行政支持人员在 QI 方面的感知支持需求提供了一种结构化和系统的方法。该项目的结果为在应用医疗保健环境中跟踪有针对性的 QI 支持提供了一个有用的基准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a418/9887700/5a97d2b9be88/bmjoq-2022-002039f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a418/9887700/d55ec3ccaa17/bmjoq-2022-002039f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a418/9887700/5a97d2b9be88/bmjoq-2022-002039f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a418/9887700/d55ec3ccaa17/bmjoq-2022-002039f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a418/9887700/5a97d2b9be88/bmjoq-2022-002039f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying and prioritising the key components of a Quality Improvement Network for allied health professionals and psychological therapists: a group concept mapping project.确定和优先考虑联合健康专业人员和心理治疗师的质量改进网络的关键组成部分:一个团体概念映射项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jan;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002039.
2
Conceptualizing the key components of rehabilitation following major musculoskeletal trauma: A mixed methods service evaluation.概念化主要肌肉骨骼创伤后康复的关键组成部分:混合方法服务评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Oct;26(5):1436-1447. doi: 10.1111/jep.13331. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
3
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Delivering allied health services to regional and remote participants on the autism spectrum via video-conferencing technology: lessons learned.通过视频会议技术为自闭症谱系障碍的偏远地区参与者提供联合健康服务:经验教训
Rural Remote Health. 2019 Sep;19(3):5358. doi: 10.22605/RRH5358. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
6
Realist evaluation of allied health management in Queensland: what works, in which contexts and why.昆士兰联合健康管理的现实主义评估:哪些措施有效、在何种背景下有效以及原因何在。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Aug;43(4):466-473. doi: 10.1071/AH17265.
7
Mixed-Methods Study Identifying Key Intervention Targets to Improve Participation in Daily Living Activities in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome Patients.混合方法研究确定改善原发性干燥综合征患者日常生活活动参与的关键干预目标。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Jul;70(7):1064-1073. doi: 10.1002/acr.23536. Epub 2018 May 21.
8
What is needed to implement a web-based audit and feedback intervention with outreach visits to improve care quality: A concept mapping study among cardiac rehabilitation teams.实施基于网络的审核与反馈干预并进行外展访问以提高护理质量需要什么:心脏康复团队的概念图研究
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
9
A concept mapping study evaluating the UK's first NHS generic fatigue clinic.一项评估英国首个国民保健服务通用疲劳诊所的概念图研究。
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1138-49. doi: 10.1111/hex.12405. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
10
What is needed to implement a computer-assisted health risk assessment tool? An exploratory concept mapping study.实现计算机辅助健康风险评估工具需要什么?一项探索性的概念映射研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Dec 19;12:149. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-149.

引用本文的文献

1
First Nations Australians and head and neck cancer: health professionals' priorities for improving the pathway of care.澳大利亚原住民与头颈癌:医疗专业人员改善护理途径的优先事项。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 25;33(7):624. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09651-y.
2
Embedding research within occupational therapy pre-registration training: A concept mapping study engaging staff and student voices.将研究融入职业治疗预注册培训:一项汇聚员工和学生声音的概念映射研究。
Br J Occup Ther. 2024 Oct;87(10):645-656. doi: 10.1177/03080226241253102. Epub 2024 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Determining the skills needed by frontline NHS staff to deliver quality improvement: findings from six case studies.确定一线 NHS 员工提供质量改进所需的技能:来自六个案例研究的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jun;31(6):450-461. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013065. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
2
Quality and safety in the time of Coronavirus: design better, learn faster.新冠疫情时期的质量和安全:设计更优,学习更快。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Mar 5;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa051.
3
Quality improvement into practice.将质量改进付诸实践。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 31;368:m865. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m865.
4
Conceptualizing the key components of rehabilitation following major musculoskeletal trauma: A mixed methods service evaluation.概念化主要肌肉骨骼创伤后康复的关键组成部分:混合方法服务评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Oct;26(5):1436-1447. doi: 10.1111/jep.13331. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
5
A nudge towards increased experimentation to more rapidly improve healthcare.推动增加实验,以更快地改善医疗保健。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Mar;29(3):179-181. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009948. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
6
How to improve healthcare improvement-an essay by Mary Dixon-Woods.如何改善医疗保健——玛丽·迪克森 - 伍兹的一篇文章
BMJ. 2019 Oct 1;367:l5514. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5514.
7
Spreading and scaling up innovation and improvement.推广和扩大创新和改进。
BMJ. 2019 May 10;365:l2068. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2068.
8
Using data for improvement.利用数据促进改进。
BMJ. 2019 Feb 15;364:l189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l189.
9
How to get started in quality improvement.如何开启质量改进工作。
BMJ. 2019 Jan 17;364:k5408. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5437.
10
Middle managers' role in implementing evidence-based practices in healthcare: a systematic review.中层管理者在医疗保健中实施基于证据的实践中的作用:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Dec 12;13(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0843-5.