• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定一线 NHS 员工提供质量改进所需的技能:来自六个案例研究的结果。

Determining the skills needed by frontline NHS staff to deliver quality improvement: findings from six case studies.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Wessex Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jun;31(6):450-461. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013065. Epub 2021 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013065
PMID:34452950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9132850/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have detailed the technical, learning and soft skills healthcare staff deploy to deliver quality improvement (QI). However, research has mainly focused on management and leadership skills, overlooking the skills frontline staff use to improve care. Our research explored which skills mattered to frontline health practitioners delivering QI projects.

STUDY DESIGN

We used a theory-driven approach, informed by communities of practice, knowledge-in-practice-in-context and positive deviance theory. We used case studies to examine skill use in three pseudonymised English hospital Trusts, selected on the basis of Care Quality Commission rating. Seventy-three senior staff orientation interviews led to the selection of two QI projects at each site. Snowball sampling obtained a maximally varied range of 87 staff with whom we held 122 semistructured interviews at different stages of QI delivery, analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Six overarching 'Socio-Organisational Functional and Facilitative Tasks' (SOFFTs) were deployed by frontline staff. Several of these had to be enacted to address challenges faced. The SOFFTs included: (1) adopting and promulgating the appropriate organisational environment; (2) managing the QI rollercoaster; (3) getting the problem right; (4) getting the right message to the right people; (5) enabling learning to occur; and (6) contextualising experience. Each task had its own inherent skills.

CONCLUSION

Our case studies provide a nuanced understanding of the skills used by healthcare staff. While technical skills are important, the ability to judge when and how to use wider skills was paramount. The provision of QI training and fidelity to the improvement programme may be less of a priority than the deployment of SOFFT skills used to overcome barriers. QI projects will fail if such skills and resources are not accessed.

摘要

背景

先前的研究详细介绍了医疗保健人员在提供质量改进(QI)时所运用的技术、学习和软技能。然而,研究主要集中在管理和领导技能上,忽视了一线工作人员用于改善护理的技能。我们的研究探讨了哪些技能对提供 QI 项目的一线卫生从业人员很重要。

研究设计

我们使用了一种理论驱动的方法,该方法受到实践社区、实践中的知识和上下文以及正向偏离理论的启发。我们使用案例研究来检查三个化名的英国医院信托机构中技能的使用情况,这些机构是根据护理质量委员会的评级选择的。对 73 名高级员工进行了定向访谈,以在每个地点选择两个 QI 项目。雪球抽样获得了最大程度多样化的 87 名员工,我们与他们一起在 QI 交付的不同阶段进行了 122 次半结构化访谈,并进行了主题分析。

结果

一线员工部署了六个总体的“社会组织功能和促进任务”(SOFFTs)。为了解决面临的挑战,必须执行其中的几个任务。这些 SOFFTs 包括:(1)采用和推广适当的组织环境;(2)管理 QI 过山车;(3)正确解决问题;(4)将正确的信息传达给正确的人;(5)促进学习发生;(6)使经验背景化。每个任务都有其自身固有的技能。

结论

我们的案例研究提供了对医疗保健人员使用的技能的细致理解。虽然技术技能很重要,但判断何时以及如何使用更广泛的技能至关重要。QI 培训的提供和对改进计划的保真度可能不如部署用于克服障碍的 SOFFT 技能重要。如果无法获得这些技能和资源,QI 项目将失败。

相似文献

1
Determining the skills needed by frontline NHS staff to deliver quality improvement: findings from six case studies.确定一线 NHS 员工提供质量改进所需的技能:来自六个案例研究的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jun;31(6):450-461. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013065. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
2
Factors influencing measurement for improvement skills in healthcare staff: trainee, and trainer perspectives.影响医疗保健人员改进技能测量的因素:受训者和培训师的观点。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 2;22(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03282-1.
3
A two-pronged quality improvement training program for leaders and frontline staff.针对领导者和一线员工的双管齐下的质量改进培训计划。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Apr;37(4):147-53. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37018-3.
4
Exploring the sustainability of quality improvement interventions in healthcare organisations: a multiple methods study of the 10-year impact of the 'Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care' programme in English acute hospitals.探索医疗保健组织中质量改进干预措施的可持续性:一项为期 10 年的“生产病房:释放时间护理”计划在英国急性医院的影响的多方法研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jan;29(1):31-40. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009457. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
5
'Team capital' in quality improvement teams: findings from an ethnographic study of front-line quality improvement in the NHS.质量改进团队中的“团队资本”:英国国家医疗服务体系一线质量改进的民族志研究结果。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 May;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000948.
6
Co-produced capability framework for successful patient and staff partnerships in healthcare quality improvement: results of a scoping review.共同制定能力框架,以成功建立医疗保健质量改进中的患者和员工伙伴关系:范围综述的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Feb;31(2):134-146. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012729. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
7
An evaluation of the implementation of quality improvement (QI) in primary care dentistry: a multi-method approach.评价初级保健牙科中质量改进 (QI) 的实施情况:一种多方法的方法。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Apr;10(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000839.
8
How do frontline staff use patient experience data for service improvement? Findings from an ethnographic case study evaluation.一线工作人员如何利用患者体验数据来改善服务?一项人种学案例研究评估的结果。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2020 Jul;25(3):151-161. doi: 10.1177/1355819619888675. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
9
10
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Communities against cancer: a qualitative study assessing the effectiveness of a community engagement initiative in improving cancer awareness for marginalised communities.社区抗癌:一项定性研究,评估社区参与倡议在提高边缘化社区癌症意识方面的有效性。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 31;25(1):2011. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23179-0.
2
Continuous quality improvement across a South Australian health service and the role it plays in a learning health system: a qualitative study.南澳大利亚州一家医疗服务机构的持续质量改进及其在学习型医疗系统中所发挥的作用:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12557-4.
3
What are the features of high-performing quality improvement collaboratives? A qualitative case study of a state-wide collaboratives programme.高绩效质量改进合作有哪些特点?全州范围合作项目的定性案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 13;13(12):e076648. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076648.
4
Behaviour change, the itchy spot of healthcare quality improvement: How can psychology theory and skills help to scratch the itch?行为改变——医疗质量提升的痛点:心理学理论与技能如何助力解决这一难题?
Health Psychol Open. 2023 Sep 21;10(2):20551029231198938. doi: 10.1177/20551029231198938. eCollection 2023 Jul-Dec.
5
Publishing quality improvement studies: learning to share and sharing to learn.发表质量改进研究:学会分享与通过分享来学习。
BJA Open. 2023 Feb 3;5:100123. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100123. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
A narrative inquiry into healthcare staff resilience and the sustainability of Quality Improvement implementation efforts during Covid-19.叙事探究医疗保健人员的韧性以及在新冠疫情期间实施质量改进工作的可持续性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 24;23(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09190-4.
7
Identifying and prioritising the key components of a Quality Improvement Network for allied health professionals and psychological therapists: a group concept mapping project.确定和优先考虑联合健康专业人员和心理治疗师的质量改进网络的关键组成部分:一个团体概念映射项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jan;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002039.
8
The Evaluation of an Interprofessional QI Program: A Qualitative Study.跨专业质量改进计划评估:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 15;19(16):10087. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610087.
9
Factors influencing measurement for improvement skills in healthcare staff: trainee, and trainer perspectives.影响医疗保健人员改进技能测量的因素:受训者和培训师的观点。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 2;22(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03282-1.
10
Editorial.社论。
J Res Nurs. 2021 Dec;26(8):721-722. doi: 10.1177/17449871211066626. Epub 2021 Dec 3.

本文引用的文献

1
'Team capital' in quality improvement teams: findings from an ethnographic study of front-line quality improvement in the NHS.质量改进团队中的“团队资本”:英国国家医疗服务体系一线质量改进的民族志研究结果。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 May;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000948.
2
A realist evaluation to identify contexts and mechanisms that enabled and hindered implementation and had an effect on sustainability of a lean intervention in pediatric healthcare.一项现实主义评估,旨在确定促进和阻碍小儿医疗保健领域精益干预措施实施并对其可持续性产生影响的背景和机制。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 29;19(1):912. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4744-3.
3
Barriers and enablers to the implementation of a complex quality improvement intervention for acute kidney injury: A qualitative evaluation of stakeholder perceptions of the Tackling AKI study.急性肾损伤复杂质量改进干预实施的障碍和促进因素:对 Tackling AKI 研究利益相关者认知的定性评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 20;14(9):e0222444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222444. eCollection 2019.
4
Does quality improvement improve quality?质量改进能否提升质量?
Future Hosp J. 2016 Oct;3(3):191-194. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-191.
5
Implementing Frontline Worker-Led Quality Improvement in Nursing Homes: Getting to "How".在养老院实施一线工作人员主导的质量改进:落实“如何做”。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Sep;44(9):526-535. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
6
Facilitators of interdepartmental quality improvement: a mixed-methods analysis of a collaborative to improve pediatric community-acquired pneumonia management.跨部门质量改进的促进因素:一项改善儿科社区获得性肺炎管理的合作的混合方法分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Mar;28(3):215-222. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008065. Epub 2018 Aug 12.
7
Balancing the skills: the need for an improvement pyramid.平衡技能:改进金字塔的必要性。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jan;27(1):85-89. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006773. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
8
Promoters and Barriers to Implementation of Tracheal Intubation Airway Safety Bundle: A Mixed-Method Analysis.气管插管气道安全集束化方案实施的促进因素与障碍:一项混合方法分析
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct;18(10):965-972. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001251.
9
Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study.改善重症监护病房(ICU)出院流程安全性和效率的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 4;17(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2139-x.
10
Improving emergency department medical clinical handover: Barriers at the bedside.改善急诊科医疗临床交接:床边的障碍
Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Jun;29(3):297-302. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12768. Epub 2017 Mar 29.