Suppr超能文献

终末期肾病患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术的趋势、预测因素及结果:来自全国再入院数据库的见解

Trend, Predictors, and Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease: Insights From the Nationwide Readmissions Database.

作者信息

Sandhyavenu Harigopal, Ullah Waqas, Badu Irisha, Patel Bhavin A, Polam Arvind Reddy, Taha Amro, Foster Michael, Alraies M Chadi, Fischman David L, Savage Michael P

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Cardiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 May;50:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the standard of care for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). However, evidence on its safety in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is limited.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2015 to 2019 was queried to identify patients undergoing TAVI in ESRD versus patients with no ESRD. The in-hospital, 30-day and 180-day outcomes were assessed using a propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR).

RESULTS

A total of 198,816 underwent TAVI, of which 34,546 patients (TAVI-ESRD 16,986 vs. non-ESRD 17,560) were selected using PSM analysis. The adjusted odds of net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE) (aOR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.49-1.82), in-hospital mortality (aOR 2.99, 95 % CI 2.52-3.55), major bleeding (aOR 1.21, 95 % CI 1.05-1.40), postprocedural cardiogenic shock (aOR 1.54, 95 % CI 1.11-2.13), and need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM) (aOR 1.24, 95 % CI 1.15-1.38) were significantly higher in TAVI-ESRD patients compared with non-ESRD patients at index admission. There was no significant difference in the odds of stroke (aOR 1.09, 95 % CI 0.86-1.34) and cardiac tamponade (aOR 1.06, 95 % CI 0.78-1.45) between the two groups. At 30- and 180-day follow-up, the odds of readmission, NACE, and mortality remained high in TAVI-ESRD patients.

CONCLUSION

ESRD patients undergoing TAVI have a high risk of NACE, in-hospital mortality, and major bleeding compared with patients with no ESRD.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的标准治疗方法。然而,关于其在终末期肾病(ESRD)患者中的安全性证据有限。

方法

查询2015年至2019年的全国再入院数据库(NRD),以确定接受TAVI的ESRD患者与非ESRD患者。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析评估住院、30天和180天的结局,以计算调整后的优势比(aOR)。

结果

共有198,816例患者接受了TAVI,其中34,546例患者(TAVI-ESRD组16,986例,非ESRD组17,560例)通过PSM分析进行选择。在首次入院时,TAVI-ESRD患者发生净不良心血管事件(NACE)(aOR 1.65,95%CI 1.49-至1.82)、住院死亡率(aOR 2.99,95%CI 2.52-3.55)、大出血(aOR 1.21,95%CI 1.05-1.40)、术后心源性休克(aOR 1.54,95%CI 1.11-2.13)以及需要植入永久性起搏器(PPM)(aOR 1.24,95%CI 1.15-1.38)的调整后优势比显著高于非ESRD患者。两组之间的中风(aOR 1.09,95%CI 0.86-1.34)和心脏压塞(aOR 1.06,95%CI 0.78-1.45)优势比无显著差异。在30天和180天随访时,TAVI-ESRD患者的再入院、NACE和死亡率优势比仍然很高。

结论

与非ESRD患者相比,接受TAVI的ESRD患者发生NACE、住院死亡率和大出血的风险较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验