Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Psychophysiology. 2023 Jun;60(6):e14260. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14260. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
Sensorimotor responses vary as a function of the cardiac cycle phase. These effects, known as cardiac cycle time effects, have been explained by the inhibition of cardiac afferent signals on information processing. However, the validity of cardiac cycle time effects is challenged by mixed findings. Factors such as current information processing and affective context may modulate cardiac cycle time effects and account for inconsistencies in the literature. The current study examines the influence of cardiac cycle time and threatening stimuli on two aspects of sensorimotor processing, response speed and inhibition. Thirty-four participants (M = 19.35 years; 29 female) completed an auditory Go/No-go task in no face, neutral face, and fearful face conditions. Faces were presented at either cardiac diastole or systole. Participants' reaction times (RTs) during Go trials and failures in response inhibition during No-go trials were recorded. The ex-Gaussian model was fit to RT data in each condition deriving the parameters, mu (μ) and tau (τ), that indicate response speed and attentional lapses, respectively. Repeated measures ANOVA were used to analyze behavioral data. Results showed that cardiac systole prolonged μ but decreased τ, and that cardiac diastole reduced inhibition errors in the fearful face condition but not in other conditions. These findings indicate that cardiac timing differentially modulates sensory-perceptual and top-down attentional processes and cardiac timing interacts with threatening contexts to influence response inhibition. These results highlight the specificity of cardiac cycle time effects on sensorimotor processing.
感觉运动反应随心动周期相位而变化。这些效应被称为心动周期时间效应,其被解释为心脏传入信号对信息处理的抑制。然而,心动周期时间效应的有效性受到混合发现的挑战。当前的信息处理和情感背景等因素可能会调节心动周期时间效应,并解释文献中的不一致性。本研究考察了心动周期时间和威胁性刺激对感觉运动加工两个方面的影响,即反应速度和抑制。34 名参与者(M = 19.35 岁;29 名女性)在无脸、中性脸和恐惧脸条件下完成了听觉 Go/No-go 任务。面孔在心脏舒张期或收缩期呈现。记录参与者在 Go 试验中的反应时(RT)和在 No-go 试验中反应抑制失败时的反应时。在每个条件下,使用 Ex-Gaussian 模型拟合 RT 数据,得出分别表示反应速度和注意力失误的参数μ(μ)和τ(τ)。使用重复测量方差分析来分析行为数据。结果表明,心脏收缩期延长了 μ,但缩短了 τ,并且心脏舒张期减少了恐惧面孔条件下的抑制错误,但在其他条件下没有。这些发现表明,心脏计时以不同的方式调节感觉知觉和自上而下的注意过程,并且心脏计时与威胁性情境相互作用,影响反应抑制。这些结果强调了心动周期时间效应对感觉运动加工的特异性。