Querin F, Lutman M
Servizio di Radiologia, Stabilimento Ospedaliero, Pordenone.
Radiol Med. 1987 Oct;74(4):293-300.
CT scans were performed on 25 patients suspected of sustaining renal trauma. The utility of CT in both detecting renal damage and appraising the gravity of injuries was assessed. Nowadays, in fact, nephrectomy is reserved for lesions devastating the kidney parenchyma or rupturing the renal pedicle; so it is very important to identify both the kind of lesions, and the extent of the damage, for the purposes of a better planned therapeutic approach. CT does both, being more accurate than urography in the detection of renal fractures, intra or extraparenchymal hematomas and contrast media extravasation. Urography very often shows aspecific lesion patterns and sometimes it is also falsely negative. In the present series CT was more reliable than angiography itself, particularly in the diagnosis of extra-renal hematic collections, contrast media extravasation and injuries to the other abdominal organs. Although CT may arouse the suspicion of and sometimes correctly diagnose vascular lesions, such as renal infarction, angiography remains the choice examination in the study of vascular lesions, thanks to its characteristic and unmistakable images.
对25名疑似肾外伤的患者进行了CT扫描。评估了CT在检测肾损伤和评估损伤严重程度方面的效用。事实上,如今肾切除术仅适用于破坏肾实质或肾蒂断裂的病变;因此,为了制定更好的治疗方案,识别病变类型和损伤程度非常重要。CT两者都能做到,在检测肾骨折、实质内或实质外血肿以及造影剂外渗方面比尿路造影更准确。尿路造影常常显示非特异性病变模式,有时还会出现假阴性。在本系列研究中,CT比血管造影本身更可靠,尤其是在诊断肾外血肿、造影剂外渗和其他腹部器官损伤方面。尽管CT可能会引起对血管病变的怀疑,有时还能正确诊断血管病变,如肾梗死,但由于其具有特征性且明确无误的图像,血管造影仍是研究血管病变的首选检查方法。