Suppr超能文献

关怀伦理学与工作的未来:一种不同的声音。

Care Ethics and the Future of Work: a Different Voice.

作者信息

Ley Madelaine

机构信息

Ethics/Philosophy Section, Department of Values, Technology and Innovation, Faculty of Technology, Management and Policy, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft, Netherlands.

出版信息

Philos Technol. 2023;36(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s13347-022-00604-5. Epub 2023 Jan 26.

Abstract

The discourse on the future of work should learn from a turn in philosophy that occurred in the 1980s, one that recognizes the good life towards which ethics strives can only be reached on a foundation of caring relationships (Gillian, 1982; Noddings, 1984). Care ethics recognizes that human well-being is a group project, one that involves strong relationships, and concern for bodies and emotions. Too often, these features are left out of research exploring robotics in the workplace. This paper outlines the main tenets of care ethics, then applies the moral framework to the context of industrial and retail settings using robots. This approach sees these contexts through a relational lens, helping to identify, evaluate, and improve relationships critical to ensuring workers' well-being. Second, care ethics considers taking care of people's bodies beyond mere safety, examining how working with robots can exacerbate societal or economic pressures. Lastly, care ethics takes emotions as an important source of knowledge in building and supporting care. Additionally, this paper contributes to the care ethics literature by applying the framework to the context of robotized industrial workplaces, which has yet to be done.

摘要

关于未来工作的论述应该借鉴20世纪80年代哲学领域的一次转向,即认识到伦理所追求的美好生活只有在关爱关系的基础上才能实现(吉利安,1982;诺丁斯,1984)。关怀伦理学认识到人类福祉是一项集体事业,涉及牢固的关系以及对身体和情感的关注。在探索职场机器人技术的研究中,这些特征常常被忽视。本文概述了关怀伦理学的主要原则,然后将这一道德框架应用于使用机器人的工业和零售环境。这种方法通过关系视角看待这些环境,有助于识别、评估和改善对确保工人福祉至关重要的关系。其次,关怀伦理学认为照顾人们的身体不仅仅是保障安全,还要审视与机器人合作如何加剧社会或经济压力。最后,关怀伦理学将情感视为建立和支持关怀的重要知识来源。此外,本文通过将该框架应用于机器人化工业工作场所的背景,为关怀伦理学文献做出了贡献,而这一领域此前尚未有人涉足。

相似文献

1
Care Ethics and the Future of Work: a Different Voice.
Philos Technol. 2023;36(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s13347-022-00604-5. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
3
Towards a strong virtue ethics for nursing practice.
Nurs Philos. 2006 Jul;7(3):110-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2006.00268.x.
6
A Literature Review on Safety Perception and Trust during Human-Robot Interaction with Autonomous Mobile Robots That Apply to Industrial Environments.
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2024 Jan-Jun;12(1-2):6-27. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2023.2283537. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
7
Emotions, care and particularity.
Vard Nord Utveckl Forsk. 1993 Spring;13(1):18-24. doi: 10.1177/010740839301300105.
8
9
Impacts of a Care Robotics Project on Finnish Home Care Workers' Attitudes towards Robots.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 30;17(19):7176. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197176.

引用本文的文献

1
End of Life in Italy: Ethical and Legal Perspectives.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 18;13(6):666. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060666.

本文引用的文献

1
The rise of robots increases job insecurity and maladaptive workplace behaviors: Multimethod evidence.
J Appl Psychol. 2023 May;108(5):850-870. doi: 10.1037/apl0001045. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
2
Value Sensitive Design to Achieve the UN SDGs with AI: A Case of Elderly Care Robots.
Minds Mach (Dordr). 2021;31(3):395-419. doi: 10.1007/s11023-021-09561-y. Epub 2021 May 31.
3
Risk, Technology, and Moral Emotions: Reply to Critics.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):1921-1934. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00196-3.
4
Critiquing the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):719-735. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0030-8. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
5
Designing robots for care: care centered value-sensitive design.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):407-33. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
6
Can there be an ethics of care?
J Med Ethics. 1995 Feb;21(1):19-24. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.1.19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验