Zhou T F, Yang X, Wang R J, Cheng M X, Zhang H, Wei J Q
First Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing 100034, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Feb 18;55(1):101-107. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.01.015.
To verify the consistency between the digital manufacturing simple intraoral Gothic arch-tracing device and the traditional intraoral Gothic arch-tracing device in determining the centric relation of complete dentures restoration.
Ten outpatients with edentulous jaws were selec-ted, and the centric relation of the patients was determined by digital manufacturing of simple intraoral Gothic arch-tracing device (T1) and traditional intraoral Gothic arch-tracing device (T2); the difference of clinical operation time between the two methods was recorded; the upper and lower edentulous jaw plaster models were scanned with two kinds of centric relation, the Standard Triangle Language (STL) files imported into Geomagic studio software to apply the best fitting of multiple points of the both upper jaw models, the fitted STL files imported into the 3 shape viewer software, and the maximum position deviations of the vertical, labial (buccal) and lingual directions of the mandibular midline area and molar areas in T1 and T2 groups measured. During the clinical complete dentures try-in, we observed whether there was midline deviation in the mouth of T1 group and T2 group, and whether the occlusion of posterior teeth was stable or not.
The mean time spent on determining the centric relation of T1 and T2 groups was (41.90±2.64) min, (57.50±2.37) min respectively. Paired test was conducted in the two groups, < 0.01 with significant statistical difference; The mean maximum position deviation between T1 group and T2 group of the midline mandibular region in labial lingual direction was (0.32±0.14) mm, that was (0.40±0.23) mm in vertical direction; the mean maximum position deviation of molar area in buccal lingual direction was (0.35±0.23) mm and that was (0.33±0.20) mm in vertical direction. In the vertical and horizontal directions, the maximum position deviation of mandibles between group T1 and group T2 was controlled within 0.5 mm. In the process of clinical complete dentures try-in, there was no deviation from the center line of dentures. There was not warping, swinging and other poor stability phenomena in T1 and T2 groups.
The digital manufacturing of simple intraoral Gothic arch-tracing device can be used to determine the centric relation of complete dentures, which can not only save time of clinical operation, but also ensure the accuracy of the centric relation.
验证数字化制造的简易口腔哥特式弓描记装置与传统口腔哥特式弓描记装置在全口义齿修复确定正中关系时的一致性。
选取10例无牙颌门诊患者,分别采用数字化制造的简易口腔哥特式弓描记装置(T1)和传统口腔哥特式弓描记装置(T2)确定患者的正中关系;记录两种方法临床操作时间的差异;将上下无牙颌石膏模型以两种正中关系进行扫描,把标准三角形语言(STL)文件导入Geomagic studio软件对上下颌模型多点进行最佳拟合,将拟合后的STL文件导入3 shape viewer软件,测量T1组和T2组下颌中线区及磨牙区垂直、唇(颊)向和舌向的最大位置偏差。在临床全口义齿试戴过程中,观察T1组和T2组患者口内义齿中线有无偏差,后牙咬合是否稳定。
T1组和T2组确定正中关系的平均用时分别为(41.90±2.64)min、(57.50±2.37)min。两组进行配对t检验,P<0.01,差异有统计学意义;T1组与T2组下颌中线区唇舌向平均最大位置偏差为(0.32±0.14)mm,垂直向为(0.40±0.23)mm;磨牙区颊舌向平均最大位置偏差为(0.35±0.23)mm,垂直向为(0.33±0.20)mm。在垂直和水平方向上,T1组与T2组下颌的最大位置偏差控制在0.5 mm以内。在临床全口义齿试戴过程中,义齿中线无偏差。T1组和T2组均未出现翘动、摆动等稳定性差的现象。
数字化制造的简易口腔哥特式弓描记装置可用于确定全口义齿的正中关系,不仅能节省临床操作时间,还能保证正中关系的准确性。