Suppr超能文献

乙酰水杨酸(阿司匹林)用于糖尿病患者心血管事件一级预防的系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Acetylsalicylic Acid (Aspirin) for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Division of Cardiology, Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2023;21(2):111-119. doi: 10.2174/1570161121666230131120544.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding using acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) for the prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis.

METHODS

A literature search was performed (January 1990 to February 2022) and publications meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed, and a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan software. The primary outcome was a composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, individual components of the primary outcome and major bleeding.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 33525 diabetic patients from 9 randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was significantly lower for aspirin vs. placebo (7.9 vs. 8.6, RR (risk ratio) 0.92, 95% CI (confidence interval) 0.86-0.99). All-cause mortality (10 vs. 10.3%, RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.90-1.03), CV death (4.4 vs. 4.7%, RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.83-1.04), non-fatal MI (4.6 vs. 4.8% RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.83- 1.15) and stroke (3.2 vs. 3.5%, RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.06) were similar between the two treatment groups. Major bleeding was significantly higher for aspirin compared with placebo (3.4 vs. 2.8%, RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.39).

CONCLUSION

Aspirin use in patients with DM reduces the composite endpoint of CV death, non-fatal MI and stroke compared with a placebo. However, routine use of aspirin for primary prevention among diabetic patients cannot be advised due to the increased risk of major bleeding. These findings suggest careful risk assessment of individual patients.

摘要

背景

关于在糖尿病患者中使用乙酰水杨酸(阿司匹林)预防心血管(CV)事件的证据并不一致。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析。

方法

进行了文献检索(1990 年 1 月至 2022 年 2 月),并对符合纳入标准的出版物进行了综述,并使用 RevMan 软件进行了荟萃分析。主要结局是 CV 死亡、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)和中风的复合结局。次要结局包括全因死亡率、主要结局的各个组成部分和主要出血。

结果

研究队列包括 9 项随机对照试验中的 33525 名糖尿病患者。阿司匹林与安慰剂相比,主要结局显著降低(7.9 与 8.6,RR(风险比)0.92,95%CI(置信区间)0.86-0.99)。全因死亡率(10 与 10.3%,RR 0.97,95%CI 0.90-1.03)、CV 死亡率(4.4 与 4.7%,RR 0.93,95%CI 0.83-1.04)、非致死性 MI(4.6 与 4.8%,RR 0.97,95%CI 0.83-1.15)和中风(3.2 与 3.5%,RR 0.89,95%CI 0.75-1.06)在两组治疗之间相似。阿司匹林组的主要出血发生率明显高于安慰剂组(3.4 与 2.8%,RR 1.18,95%CI 1.01-1.39)。

结论

与安慰剂相比,在糖尿病患者中使用阿司匹林可降低 CV 死亡、非致死性 MI 和中风的复合终点。然而,由于主要出血风险增加,不能建议糖尿病患者常规使用阿司匹林进行一级预防。这些发现表明需要对个体患者进行仔细的风险评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验