Division of Infectious Diseases, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Feb 22;61(2):e0169922. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01699-22. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
Quantification of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA has become the standard of care in the diagnosis and management of CMV infection in transplant recipients. The objective of the study was to evaluate performance characteristics of the Aptima CMV Quant assay in comparison to Abbott RealTie CMV assay, Qiagen Artus CMV RGQ MDx assay, and Roche cobas CMV test using plasma samples. The performance of the Aptima assay was evaluated by comparing the Exact Diagnostics CMV verification panel and positive controls, Hologic CMV internal reproducibility panel, and SeraCare CMV DNA qualification panel to the RealTie assay. Clinical agreement was evaluated using 389 clinical plasma samples comparing the Aptima assay to three comparator assays. The Aptima assay demonstrated good linearity and strong linear correlation between the assays (R = 0.99); the intra- and interassay reproducibility was excellent overall (SD = 0.09 to 0.14 and SD = 0.04 to 0.14, respectively); 95% limit of detection (LOD) is 32 IU/mL and LOQ is 45 IU/mL. The SeraCare qualification panel yielded a strong linear correlation (R = 0.99). A total of 262 positive samples were analyzed to compare Aptima and Realtie assays using Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis and demonstrated a mean bias of 0.092 Log IU/mL. Artus (85) and cobas (159) positive samples were compared to the Aptima assay using Deming regression and Bland-Altman analyses and showed mean bias of 0.184 and -0.208 Log IU/mL, respectively. The findings demonstrate that the Aptima assay is sensitive and accurate in quantifying CMV in plasma specimens on the fully automated Panther system and that the results were comparable to the other FDA-approved CMV assays.
巨细胞病毒 (CMV) DNA 的定量检测已成为移植受者 CMV 感染诊断和管理的标准。本研究旨在评估 Aptima CMV Quant 检测与 Abbott RealTie CMV 检测、Qiagen Artus CMV RGQ MDx 检测和 Roche cobas CMV 检测在血浆样本中的性能特征。通过将Exact Diagnostics CMV 验证面板和阳性对照、Hologic CMV 内部重复性面板以及 SeraCare CMV DNA 质量控制面板与 RealTie 检测进行比较,评估 Aptima 检测的性能。使用 389 份临床血浆样本评估临床一致性,将 Aptima 检测与三种比较检测进行比较。Aptima 检测显示出良好的线性和强线性相关性(R = 0.99);总体而言,内和间试验重复性极好(SD = 0.09 至 0.14 和 SD = 0.04 至 0.14);95%检测限(LOD)为 32 IU/mL,定量限(LOQ)为 45 IU/mL。SeraCare 质量控制面板产生了强线性相关性(R = 0.99)。为了比较 Aptima 和 Realtie 检测,使用 Deming 回归和 Bland-Altman 分析对总共 262 份阳性样本进行了分析,结果表明平均偏差为 0.092 Log IU/mL。使用 Deming 回归和 Bland-Altman 分析对 Artus(85)和 cobas(159)阳性样本与 Aptima 检测进行了比较,结果显示平均偏差分别为 0.184 和 -0.208 Log IU/mL。这些发现表明,Aptima 检测在 Panther 全自动系统上定量检测血浆样本中的 CMV 具有较高的灵敏度和准确性,且结果与其他获得 FDA 批准的 CMV 检测相当。