• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Performance Characteristics of the Aptima CMV Quant Assay for the Detection and Quantitation of CMV DNA in Plasma Samples.评价 Aptima CMV Quant 检测在检测和定量血浆样本中 CMV DNA 方面的性能特征。
J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Feb 22;61(2):e0169922. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01699-22. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
2
Analytical characteristics and comparative evaluation of Aptima HCV quant Dx assay with the Abbott RealTime HCV assay and Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV quantitative test v2.0.Aptima HCV定量诊断检测与雅培实时HCV检测及罗氏COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV定量检测v2.0的分析特性及比较评估
Virol J. 2017 Apr 4;14(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12985-017-0727-3.
3
Evaluation of Performance Characteristics of the Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay for Detection and Quantitation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in Plasma and Cervicovaginal Lavage Samples.评估Aptima HIV-1定量诊断检测法在血浆和宫颈阴道灌洗样本中检测和定量人类免疫缺陷病毒1型的性能特征
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Apr;54(4):1036-41. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03289-15. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
4
Performance evaluation of the Aptima CMV quant assay using plasma and non-plasma samples.采用血浆和非血浆样本对 Aptima CMV quant 检测进行性能评估。
J Clin Virol. 2023 Jul;164:105467. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105467. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
5
Evaluation of the Aptima HBV Quant Assay Compared to Abbott RealTime M2000 HBV Quant Assay and Procleix Ultrio Plus dHBV Assay in Plasma Samples.评价 Aptima HBV Quant Assay 与 Abbott RealTime M2000 HBV Quant Assay 和 Procleix Ultrio Plus dHBV Assay 在血浆样本中的应用。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0176122. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01761-22. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
6
Performance evaluation of the Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA detection and quantification in comparison to the Abbott RealTime HCV assay.Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay 与 Abbott RealTime HCV assay 比较,用于丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV) RNA 检测和定量的性能评估。
J Clin Virol. 2017 Jul;92:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
7
Comparative performance of the new Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay with three commercial PCR-based HIV-1 RNA quantitation assays.新型Aptima HIV-1定量诊断检测法与三种基于聚合酶链反应的商用HIV-1 RNA定量检测法的性能比较。
J Clin Virol. 2015 Aug;69:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 May 29.
8
Evaluation of the Aptima(®) HIV-1 Quant Dx assay for HIV-1 RNA viral load detection and quantitation in plasma of HIV-1-infected individuals: A comparison with Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay.评估Aptima(®)HIV-1定量诊断检测法在检测和定量HIV-1感染者血浆中HIV-1 RNA病毒载量方面的性能:与雅培实时HIV-1检测法的比较。
J Med Virol. 2016 Sep;88(9):1535-44. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24493. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
9
Evaluation of the Aptima HBV Quant assay vs. the COBAS TaqMan HBV test using the high pure system for the quantitation of HBV DNA in plasma and serum samples.采用高纯度系统评估 Aptima HBV Quant 检测与 COBAS TaqMan HBV 检测对血浆和血清样本中 HBV DNA 的定量检测。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Mar 28;56(4):634-641. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0701.
10
Assessment of an automated Cytomegalovirus nucleic acid amplification test using clinical plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage, and tissue specimens.使用临床血浆、支气管肺泡灌洗液和组织标本评估一种自动化巨细胞病毒核酸扩增检测。
J Clin Virol. 2023 Nov;168:105582. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105582. Epub 2023 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Fourth International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplantation.《实体器官移植中巨细胞病毒管理的第四届国际共识指南》
Transplantation. 2025 Jul 1;109(7):1066-1110. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005374. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
2
Mitigation of errors on an FDA-approved platform for cytomegalovirus viral load assay.在一个经美国食品药品监督管理局批准的巨细胞病毒病毒载量检测平台上减少误差。
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Jul 16;62(7):e0041624. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00416-24. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
3
Molecular diagnosis of Cytomegalovirus infection: clinical performance of the Aptima transcription-mediated amplification assay toward conventional qPCR chemistry on whole blood samples.巨细胞病毒感染的分子诊断:Aptima转录介导扩增检测法对全血样本常规定量聚合酶链反应化学法的临床性能
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Mar 13;62(3):e0090623. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00906-23. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
4
Advances and Challenges in Cytomegalovirus Detection Methods for Liver Transplant Donors.肝移植供体巨细胞病毒检测方法的进展与挑战
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 26;13(21):3310. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13213310.

评价 Aptima CMV Quant 检测在检测和定量血浆样本中 CMV DNA 方面的性能特征。

Evaluation of Performance Characteristics of the Aptima CMV Quant Assay for the Detection and Quantitation of CMV DNA in Plasma Samples.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Feb 22;61(2):e0169922. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01699-22. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.01699-22
PMID:36719219
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9945493/
Abstract

Quantification of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA has become the standard of care in the diagnosis and management of CMV infection in transplant recipients. The objective of the study was to evaluate performance characteristics of the Aptima CMV Quant assay in comparison to Abbott RealTie CMV assay, Qiagen Artus CMV RGQ MDx assay, and Roche cobas CMV test using plasma samples. The performance of the Aptima assay was evaluated by comparing the Exact Diagnostics CMV verification panel and positive controls, Hologic CMV internal reproducibility panel, and SeraCare CMV DNA qualification panel to the RealTie assay. Clinical agreement was evaluated using 389 clinical plasma samples comparing the Aptima assay to three comparator assays. The Aptima assay demonstrated good linearity and strong linear correlation between the assays (R = 0.99); the intra- and interassay reproducibility was excellent overall (SD = 0.09 to 0.14 and SD = 0.04 to 0.14, respectively); 95% limit of detection (LOD) is 32 IU/mL and LOQ is 45 IU/mL. The SeraCare qualification panel yielded a strong linear correlation (R = 0.99). A total of 262 positive samples were analyzed to compare Aptima and Realtie assays using Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis and demonstrated a mean bias of 0.092 Log IU/mL. Artus (85) and cobas (159) positive samples were compared to the Aptima assay using Deming regression and Bland-Altman analyses and showed mean bias of 0.184 and -0.208 Log IU/mL, respectively. The findings demonstrate that the Aptima assay is sensitive and accurate in quantifying CMV in plasma specimens on the fully automated Panther system and that the results were comparable to the other FDA-approved CMV assays.

摘要

巨细胞病毒 (CMV) DNA 的定量检测已成为移植受者 CMV 感染诊断和管理的标准。本研究旨在评估 Aptima CMV Quant 检测与 Abbott RealTie CMV 检测、Qiagen Artus CMV RGQ MDx 检测和 Roche cobas CMV 检测在血浆样本中的性能特征。通过将Exact Diagnostics CMV 验证面板和阳性对照、Hologic CMV 内部重复性面板以及 SeraCare CMV DNA 质量控制面板与 RealTie 检测进行比较,评估 Aptima 检测的性能。使用 389 份临床血浆样本评估临床一致性,将 Aptima 检测与三种比较检测进行比较。Aptima 检测显示出良好的线性和强线性相关性(R = 0.99);总体而言,内和间试验重复性极好(SD = 0.09 至 0.14 和 SD = 0.04 至 0.14);95%检测限(LOD)为 32 IU/mL,定量限(LOQ)为 45 IU/mL。SeraCare 质量控制面板产生了强线性相关性(R = 0.99)。为了比较 Aptima 和 Realtie 检测,使用 Deming 回归和 Bland-Altman 分析对总共 262 份阳性样本进行了分析,结果表明平均偏差为 0.092 Log IU/mL。使用 Deming 回归和 Bland-Altman 分析对 Artus(85)和 cobas(159)阳性样本与 Aptima 检测进行了比较,结果显示平均偏差分别为 0.184 和 -0.208 Log IU/mL。这些发现表明,Aptima 检测在 Panther 全自动系统上定量检测血浆样本中的 CMV 具有较高的灵敏度和准确性,且结果与其他获得 FDA 批准的 CMV 检测相当。