Suppr超能文献

采用血浆和非血浆样本对 Aptima CMV quant 检测进行性能评估。

Performance evaluation of the Aptima CMV quant assay using plasma and non-plasma samples.

机构信息

Esoteric Testing Laboratory, Pathology Department, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, United States of America.

Esoteric Testing Laboratory, Pathology Department, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, United States of America.

出版信息

J Clin Virol. 2023 Jul;164:105467. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105467. Epub 2023 Apr 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection has a major negative impact on transplantation and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in this patient population. Quantitation of CMV infections using a molecular test is the preferred method for monitoring patients post-transplant. For this analysis, we compared the Aptima CMV Quant Assay (Aptima CMV) on the Panther system to the ELITech MGB Alert® CMV 3.0 ASR (MGB CMV) run on the ELITe InGenius®.

METHODS

The analytical performance of the assay was assessed using commercially available CMV reference panels that meet the 1st WHO International Standard for Human Cytomegalovirus for nucleic acid amplification techniques. The clinical performance of the assay was determined using 249 plasma and non-plasma samples.

RESULTS

The 95% LOD of the Aptima assay was determined to be 50 IU/mL and 200 IU/mL for the MGB CMV assay. A strong linear correlation with the reference panel (R = 0.9945), excellent reproducibility, and accuracy (R = 0.986) over the detection range of the assay was observed. Of the 249 clinical samples tested, only 17 (6.8%) yielded discordant results which were at or near the lower limit of quantification of the assays. Although the Aptima CMV assay demonstrated excellent concordance of qualitative results to the MGB CMV assay for all samples, the MGB CMV quantified CMV DNA at an average of 0.5 Log IU/mL higher than Aptima CMV.

CONCLUSION

The Aptima CMV assay is both sensitive and accurate in quantifying CMV in both plasma and non-plasma specimens on the fully automated Panther system.

摘要

背景

巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染对移植有重大负面影响,并与该患者人群的发病率和死亡率增加有关。使用分子检测定量 CMV 感染是监测移植后患者的首选方法。在这项分析中,我们比较了 Panther 系统上的 Aptima CMV Quant Assay(Aptima CMV)和 ELITe InGenius 系统上的 ELITech MGB Alert® CMV 3.0 ASR(MGB CMV)。

方法

使用符合用于核酸扩增技术的第 1 个世界卫生组织国际标准的市售 CMV 参考面板评估检测的分析性能。使用 249 个血浆和非血浆样本确定检测的临床性能。

结果

Aptima 检测的 95% LOD 确定为 50 IU/mL 和 200 IU/mL 的 MGB CMV 检测。观察到与参考面板(R=0.9945)具有很强的线性相关性,在检测范围内具有出色的重现性和准确性(R=0.986)。在测试的 249 个临床样本中,只有 17 个(6.8%)产生了接近或低于检测的定量下限的不一致结果。尽管 Aptima CMV 检测对所有样本的定性结果与 MGB CMV 检测具有出色的一致性,但 MGB CMV 定量的 CMV DNA 平均比 Aptima CMV 高 0.5 Log IU/mL。

结论

Aptima CMV 检测在 Panther 全自动系统上定量检测血浆和非血浆标本中的 CMV 既敏感又准确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验