Suppr超能文献

语音助手对关于新冠疫苗问题的回应:全国横断面研究。

Voice Assistants' Responses to Questions About the COVID-19 Vaccine: National Cross-sectional Study.

作者信息

Sossenheimer Philip, Hong Grace, Devon-Sand Anna, Lin Steven

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2023 Feb 8;7:e43007. doi: 10.2196/43007.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence-powered voice assistants (VAs), such as Apple Siri, Google Assistant, and Amazon Alexa, interact with users in natural language and are capable of responding to simple commands, searching the internet, and answering questions. Despite being an increasingly popular way for the public to access health information, VAs could be a source of ambiguous or potentially biased information.

OBJECTIVE

In response to the ongoing prevalence of vaccine misinformation and disinformation, this study aims to evaluate how smartphone VAs respond to information- and recommendation-seeking inquiries regarding the COVID-19 vaccine.

METHODS

A national cross-sectional survey of English-speaking adults who owned a smartphone with a VA installed was conducted online from April 22 to 28, 2021. The primary outcomes were the VAs' responses to 2 questions: "Should I get the COVID vaccine?" and "Is the COVID vaccine safe?" Directed content analysis was used to assign a negative, neutral, or positive connotation to each response and website title provided by the VAs. Statistical significance was assessed using the t test (parametric) or Mann-Whitney U (nonparametric) test for continuous variables and the chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

Of the 466 survey respondents included in the final analysis, 404 (86.7%) used Apple Siri, 53 (11.4%) used Google Assistant, and 9 (1.9%) used Amazon Alexa. In response to the question "Is the COVID vaccine safe?" 419 (89.9%) users received a direct response, of which 408 (97.3%) had a positive connotation encouraging users to get vaccinated. Of the websites presented, only 5.3% (11/207) had a positive connotation and 94.7% (196/207) had a neutral connotation. In response to the question "Should I get the COVID vaccine?" 93.1% (434/466) of users received a list of websites, of which 91.5% (1155/1262) had a neutral connotation. For both COVID-19 vaccine-related questions, there was no association between the connotation of a response and the age, gender, zip code, race or ethnicity, and education level of the respondent.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that VAs were much more likely to respond directly with positive connotations to the question "Is the COVID vaccine safe?" but not respond directly and provide a list of websites with neutral connotations to the question "Should I get the COVID vaccine?" To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate how VAs respond to both information- and recommendation-seeking inquiries regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. These findings add to our growing understanding of both the opportunities and pitfalls of VAs in supporting public health information dissemination.

摘要

背景

人工智能驱动的语音助手,如苹果Siri、谷歌助手和亚马逊Alexa,以自然语言与用户交互,能够响应简单命令、搜索互联网并回答问题。尽管这已成为公众获取健康信息越来越普遍的方式,但语音助手可能是模糊或潜在有偏差信息的来源。

目的

针对疫苗错误信息和虚假信息持续流行的情况,本研究旨在评估智能手机语音助手如何回应有关新冠疫苗的信息寻求和建议寻求询问。

方法

2021年4月22日至28日在线开展了一项针对拥有安装了语音助手的智能手机的英语成年使用者的全国横断面调查。主要结果是语音助手对两个问题的回答:“我应该接种新冠疫苗吗?”和“新冠疫苗安全吗?”采用定向内容分析法为语音助手提供的每个回答和网站标题赋予负面、中性或正面含义。对于连续变量,使用t检验(参数检验)或曼-惠特尼U检验(非参数检验)评估统计学显著性;对于分类变量,使用卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验评估。

结果

最终分析纳入的466名调查受访者中,404人(86.7%)使用苹果Siri,53人(11.4%)使用谷歌助手,9人(1.9%)使用亚马逊Alexa。对于“新冠疫苗安全吗?”这个问题,419名(89.9%)用户收到了直接回复,其中408名(97.3%)具有鼓励用户接种疫苗的正面含义。在所呈现的网站中,只有5.3%(11/207)具有正面含义,94.7%(196/207)具有中性含义。对于“我应该接种新冠疫苗吗?”这个问题,93.1%(434/466)的用户收到了网站列表,其中91.5%(1155/1262)具有中性含义。对于两个与新冠疫苗相关的问题,回复的含义与受访者的年龄、性别、邮政编码、种族或族裔以及教育水平之间均无关联。

结论

我们的研究发现,语音助手对“新冠疫苗安全吗?”这个问题更有可能直接给出具有正面含义的回复,但对于“我应该接种新冠疫苗吗?这个问题,不太可能直接回复,而是提供具有中性含义的网站列表。据我们所知,这是第一项评估语音助手如何回应有关新冠疫苗的信息寻求和建议寻求询问的研究。这些发现加深了我们对语音助手在支持公共卫生信息传播方面的机遇和陷阱的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fbf/9947766/9dccb4918886/formative_v7i1e43007_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验