Suppr超能文献

接受当代化疗方案治疗的晚期胰腺癌患者的临床结局和治疗顺序。

Clinical Outcome and Treatment Sequences of Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Contemporary Chemotherapy Protocols.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Oncol Res Treat. 2023;46(4):140-150. doi: 10.1159/000529452. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Systemic therapy is firmly established in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Clinical efficacy is still modest and options are limited. Combination therapy protocols such as FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (Gem/NP) define standard-of-care. Patients may receive a sequence of both regimens as first- and second-line palliative treatment. However, there is no guidance regarding a preferred order.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics, treatment trajectories, and outcomes of patients with advanced PDAC treated at the West German Cancer Center Essen from 2014 to 2020 to inform treatment decisions with respect to predictive factors, impact of chemotherapy regimen sequence, and maintenance treatment.

RESULTS

We identified 170 patients with available follow-up. Of those, 160 (94.1%) patients received palliative CTX for primary metastatic, locally advanced, or recurrent PDAC. Median progression-free survival (PFS) upon first palliative chemotherapy was 4.1 (3.1-5.9) months. First-line FOLFIRINOX was associated with superior PFS (median 6.3 months) and OS (9.7 months, HR 0.7, p = 0.03) as compared to Gem/NP or other regimens (PFS 3.0, OS 6.9 months). However, OS benefit of first-line FOLFIRINOX was lost in patients who received at least two treatment lines (median OS 12.1 vs. 13.1 months, p = 0.43). A landmark analysis of patients with clinical benefit (defined as CR/PR/SD for at least 20 weeks) upon first-line therapy revealed improved OS (HR 0.53, p = 0.02) for patients receiving continued deescalated maintenance therapy. Second-line regimens resulted in similar PFS (overall log-rank p = 0.92, median PFS upon second-line therapy 2.3 [1.8-2.9], per-regimen median between 1.8 and 3.9 months). A previously established systemic inflammation score proved to be strongly prognostic and allowed identification of a patient subgroup with dismal prognosis (OS 2.9 vs. 11.4 months, HR 5.23, p < 0.001), independent of other prognostic factors and with no relevant interaction with the choice of first-line regimen.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world population of PDAC patients treated with contemporary combination chemotherapies, a positive impact of first-line FOLFIRINOX was only observed when no second or further line treatment was administered. Intensity-reduced maintenance therapy may lead to superior survival.

摘要

简介

在晚期或转移性胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者中,系统治疗已得到充分确立。但临床疗效仍较为有限,且选择有限。FOLFIRINOX 和吉西他滨/白蛋白结合型紫杉醇(Gem/NP)等联合治疗方案定义了标准治疗。患者可能会接受这两种方案作为一线和二线姑息治疗。然而,对于首选顺序,尚无指导意见。

方法

这是对 2014 年至 2020 年在德国埃森西部癌症中心接受治疗的晚期 PDAC 患者的临床特征、治疗轨迹和结局进行的回顾性分析,旨在根据预测因素、化疗方案顺序的影响和维持治疗来告知治疗决策。

结果

我们确定了 170 名可随访的患者。其中,160 名(94.1%)患者接受了姑息性 CTX 治疗原发性转移性、局部晚期或复发性 PDAC。首次姑息性化疗时的无进展生存期(PFS)中位数为 4.1(3.1-5.9)个月。与 Gem/NP 或其他方案相比,一线 FOLFIRINOX 具有更好的 PFS(中位 6.3 个月)和 OS(9.7 个月,HR 0.7,p = 0.03)。然而,在接受至少两线治疗的患者中,一线 FOLFIRINOX 的 OS 获益丧失(中位 OS 为 12.1 个月 vs. 13.1 个月,p = 0.43)。对一线治疗后有临床获益(定义为 CR/PR/SD 至少 20 周)的患者进行的 landmark 分析显示,继续进行降阶梯维持治疗的患者 OS 得到改善(HR 0.53,p = 0.02)。二线方案的 PFS 相似(总体对数秩检验 p = 0.92,二线治疗时的中位 PFS 为 2.3[1.8-2.9],每个方案的中位数在 1.8 至 3.9 个月之间)。先前建立的全身炎症评分具有很强的预后意义,可以识别预后不良的患者亚组(OS 为 2.9 个月 vs. 11.4 个月,HR 5.23,p < 0.001),独立于其他预后因素,且与一线方案的选择无明显相互作用。

结论

在接受当代联合化疗治疗的 PDAC 患者的真实世界人群中,仅当未进行二线或进一步治疗时,一线 FOLFIRINOX 才具有积极影响。强度降低的维持治疗可能会带来更好的生存。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验