Endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscopy Franseen fine needle biopsy tool versus standard fine needle aspiration needle: Impact on diagnosis and tissue adequacy.

BACKGROUND

The Franseen fine needle biopsy tool (Acquire®, Boston Scientific, Boston, MA) may provide better quality specimens than current endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TNBA) needles. We performed a comparative retrospective study evaluating the diagnostic yield of the Franseen fine needle biopsy (FNB) versus standard fine needle aspiration (FNA) for benign lymphadenopathy and tissue acquisition for next generation sequencing (NGS) in non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

All EBUS-TBNA procedures performed between January 1st, 2019 to January 1st 2020 where both the FNB needle and the FNA needle were used were analyzed. All demographic, procedural, and diagnostic data were recorded. The median tumor surface area, tumor cellularity and adequacy for NGS was evaluated for NSCLC specimens.

RESULTS

A total of 69 target lesions in 66 patients were biopsied with both the FNB and FNA needles. The mean (SD) size of target biopsied was 1.8 cm (0.8); The most common stations were 7 (54%) and 4R (26%). The mean (SD) needle passes were 6 (2.2) and 4 (1.8) with FNA and FNB needles, respectively (p < 0.0001). Benign lymphadenopathy was diagnosed with FNA needle in 46% and in 82% with FNB (p < 0.0001). NGS tissue adequacy was 47% with FNA needle versus 76% with FNB (p = 0.02). Median tumor surface area and tumor cellularity were greater with FNB needle than FNA needle (80 mm versus 9 mm, p = 0.002, and 81% versus 45%, p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSION

The FNB needle demonstrated higher diagnostic yield in benign lymphadenopathy and higher quality for NGS than standard FNA needle.