BM-Science - Brain and Mind Technologies Research Centre, 02601 Espoo, Finland.
J Integr Neurosci. 2023 Jan 17;22(1):23. doi: 10.31083/j.jin2201023.
Medical well-regarded policy recommendations for patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) are almost exclusively relied on behavioural examination and evaluation of higher-order cognition, and largely disregard the patients' self. This is so because practically establishing the presence of self-awareness or Selfhood is even more challenging than evaluating the presence of consciousness. At the same time, establishing the potential (actual physical possibility) of Selfhood in DoC patients is crucialy important from clinical, ethical, and moral standpoints because Selfhood is the most central and private evidence of being an independent and free agent that unites intention, embodiment, executive functions, attention, general intelligence, emotions and other components within the intra-subjective frame (first-person givenness). The importance of Selfhood is supported further by the observation that rebooting of self-awareness is the first step to recovery after brain damage. It seems that complex experiential Selfhood can be plausibly conceptualized within the Operational Architectonics (OA) of brain-mind functioning and reliably measured by quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG) operational synchrony.
医学上广受认可的意识障碍(DOC)患者的治疗建议几乎完全依赖于对高级认知和行为的检查和评估,而在很大程度上忽略了患者的自我。这是因为,实际上要确定自我意识或自我存在比评估意识的存在更加具有挑战性。同时,从临床、伦理和道德的角度来看,在意识障碍患者中确定自我存在的可能性至关重要,因为自我是作为一个独立和自由主体的最核心和最私密的证据,它将意图、体现、执行功能、注意力、一般智力、情感和其他组成部分统一在主体框架内(第一人称呈现)。自我存在的重要性还得到了以下观察结果的支持:自我意识的重新启动是脑损伤后恢复的第一步。似乎可以在大脑运作的操作体系结构(OA)内合理地构想复杂的经验性自我,并通过定量脑电图(qEEG)操作同步可靠地测量。