• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚合酶链反应联合量子点荧光分析在疑似血流感染患者中鉴定细菌和酵母菌的临床评估。

Clinical evaluation of polymerase chain reaction coupled with quantum dot fluorescence analysis in the identification of bacteria and yeasts in patients with suspected bloodstream infections.

机构信息

College of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.

Department of Infectious Disease, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Microb Biotechnol. 2023 Apr;16(4):827-837. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.14226. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1111/1751-7915.14226
PMID:36722318
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10034622/
Abstract

Bloodstream infections are serious and complex infectious diseases that often require a rapid diagnosis. Polymerase chain reaction coupled with quantum dot fluorescence analysis (PCR-QDFA) is a novel diagnostic technique. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PCR-QDFA for pathogen detection in patients with suspected bloodstream infections (BSIs). It evaluates 29 kinds of common pathogens (24 bacteria and 5 yeasts) from blood culture bottles. The results of PCR-QDFA identification and traditional microbial laboratory identification were compared, and the latter was used as the 'gold standard' to analyse the diagnostic performance of the PCR-QDFA. In total, 517 blood culture bottles were included in this study. The PCR-QDFA identified microorganisms in 368/422 (87.2%) samples with monomicrobial growth. For the pathogens on the PCR-QDFA list, the assay showed a higher sensitivity of 97.4% (368/378). When polymicrobial growth was analysed, the PCR-QDFA successfully detected 19/25 (76%) microorganisms on the PCR-QDFA list. In addition, 82/82 negative blood culture bottles also showed no pathogens by PCR-QDFA with a specificity of 100%. In conclusion, the PCR-QDFA assay could identify a majority of the common pathogens encountered in clinical practice, showing excellent diagnostic performance for pathogen detection in patients with suspected BSIs.

摘要

血流感染是严重且复杂的传染病,通常需要快速诊断。聚合酶链反应结合量子点荧光分析(PCR-QDFA)是一种新型诊断技术。本研究旨在评估 PCR-QDFA 检测疑似血流感染(BSI)患者病原体的诊断性能。它评估了来自血培养瓶的 29 种常见病原体(24 种细菌和 5 种酵母)。将 PCR-QDFA 鉴定结果与传统微生物实验室鉴定结果进行比较,后者作为“金标准”分析 PCR-QDFA 的诊断性能。本研究共纳入 517 个血培养瓶。PCR-QDFA 在 368/422(87.2%)个单培养生长样本中鉴定出微生物。对于 PCR-QDFA 列表上的病原体,该检测方法的灵敏度为 97.4%(368/378)。在分析多培养生长时,PCR-QDFA 成功检测到 PCR-QDFA 列表上的 19/25(76%)微生物。此外,82/82 个阴性血培养瓶也通过 PCR-QDFA 未检测到病原体,特异性为 100%。总之,PCR-QDFA 检测法可鉴定出临床实践中遇到的大多数常见病原体,对疑似 BSI 患者的病原体检测具有出色的诊断性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e0/10034622/27208227da40/MBT2-16-827-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e0/10034622/27208227da40/MBT2-16-827-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e0/10034622/27208227da40/MBT2-16-827-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of polymerase chain reaction coupled with quantum dot fluorescence analysis in the identification of bacteria and yeasts in patients with suspected bloodstream infections.聚合酶链反应联合量子点荧光分析在疑似血流感染患者中鉴定细菌和酵母菌的临床评估。
Microb Biotechnol. 2023 Apr;16(4):827-837. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.14226. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
Clinical Evaluation of Polymerase Chain Reaction Coupled with Quantum Dot Fluorescence Analysis for Diagnosis of Infection in Vulvovaginal Candidiasis Practice.聚合酶链反应结合量子点荧光分析在外阴阴道假丝酵母菌病感染诊断中的临床评估
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Jul 25;16:4857-4865. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S410128. eCollection 2023.
3
Evaluation of Real-Time PCR Coupled With Multiplex Probe Melting Curve Analysis for Pathogen Detection in Patients With Suspected Bloodstream Infections.实时荧光 PCR 联合多重探针熔解曲线分析用于疑似血流感染患者病原体检测的评估。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019 Oct 22;9:361. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00361. eCollection 2019.
4
Clinical evaluation of droplet digital PCR in the early identification of suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department: a prospective observational study.临床评估液滴数字 PCR 在急诊科疑似脓毒症患者早期识别中的应用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Jun 4;14:1358801. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1358801. eCollection 2024.
5
Performance of PCR-REBA assay for screening and identifying pathogens directly in whole blood of patients with suspected sepsis.用于直接筛查和鉴定疑似脓毒症患者全血中病原体的聚合酶链反应-快速酶联免疫斑点分析(PCR-REBA)检测的性能
J Appl Microbiol. 2015 Nov;119(5):1433-42. doi: 10.1111/jam.12941. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
6
Identification of microorganisms directly from blood culture bottles with polymicrobial growth: comparison of FilmArray and direct MALDI-TOF MS.从混合微生物生长的血培养瓶中直接鉴定微生物:FilmArray 与直接 MALDI-TOF MS 的比较。
APMIS. 2021 Apr;129(4):178-185. doi: 10.1111/apm.13107. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
7
Clinical Diagnostic Performance of Droplet Digital PCR for Suspected Bloodstream Infections.实时荧光定量 PCR 技术检测血培养中真菌的临床应用
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(1):e0137822. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01378-22. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
8
[Comparison of the Multiplex Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Method Directly from Whole Blood and from Blood Culture Bottle with the Conventional Method for the Etiological Diagnosis in Patients with Pre-Diagnosis of Sepsis].[直接从全血和血培养瓶中提取样本的多重实时聚合酶链反应方法与传统方法对脓毒症预诊断患者病因诊断的比较]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022 Jul;56(3):432-448. doi: 10.5578/mb.20229705.
9
Clinical evaluation of the FilmArray blood culture identification panel in identification of bacteria and yeasts from positive blood culture bottles.FilmArray血培养鉴定板对阳性血培养瓶中细菌和酵母菌的临床鉴定评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Dec;51(12):4130-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01835-13. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
10
Evaluation of the BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 panel and impact on patient management and antimicrobial stewardship.评估生物梅里埃血培养鉴定 2 面板及其对患者管理和抗菌药物管理的影响。
Pathology. 2021 Dec;53(7):889-895. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2021.02.016. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Evaluation of Polymerase Chain Reaction Coupled with Quantum Dot Fluorescence Analysis for Diagnosis of Infection in Vulvovaginal Candidiasis Practice.聚合酶链反应结合量子点荧光分析在外阴阴道假丝酵母菌病感染诊断中的临床评估
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Jul 25;16:4857-4865. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S410128. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Population-Based Study of Bloodstream Infection Incidence and Mortality Rates, Finland, 2004-2018.基于人群的血流感染发病率和死亡率研究,芬兰,2004-2018 年。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;27(10):2560-9. doi: 10.3201/eid2710.204826.
2
The proportion, species distribution and dynamic trends of bloodstream infection cases in a tertiary hospital in China, 2010-2019.2010-2019 年中国某三甲医院血流感染病例的构成、种类分布及动态变化趋势。
Infection. 2022 Feb;50(1):121-130. doi: 10.1007/s15010-021-01649-y. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
3
Burden of bloodstream infection in older persons: a population-based study.
老年人血流感染负担:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01984-z.
4
Considerations for Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock in an Era of Antimicrobial Resistance.在抗生素耐药时代考虑脓毒症和脓毒性休克的经验性抗菌治疗。
J Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 21;222(Suppl 2):S119-S131. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa221.
5
Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens in Culture-Proven Sepsis and Outcomes Associated With Inadequate and Broad-Spectrum Empiric Antibiotic Use.培养证实的脓毒症中抗生素耐药病原体的流行情况以及与经验性抗生素使用不足和广谱相关的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202899. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2899.
6
An approach to antibiotic treatment in patients with sepsis.脓毒症患者的抗生素治疗方法。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Mar;12(3):1007-1021. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.01.47.
7
Burden of bacterial bloodstream infection-a brief update on epidemiology and significance of multidrug-resistant pathogens.细菌血流感染负担——关于流行病学和多重耐药病原体意义的简要更新。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Feb;26(2):151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.10.031. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
8
Evaluation of Real-Time PCR Coupled With Multiplex Probe Melting Curve Analysis for Pathogen Detection in Patients With Suspected Bloodstream Infections.实时荧光 PCR 联合多重探针熔解曲线分析用于疑似血流感染患者病原体检测的评估。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019 Oct 22;9:361. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00361. eCollection 2019.
9
Advances in Rapid Molecular Blood Culture Diagnostics: Healthcare Impact, Laboratory Implications, and Multiplex Technologies.快速分子血液培养诊断技术的进展:对医疗保健的影响、实验室意义及多重技术
J Appl Lab Med. 2019 Jan;3(4):617-630. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2018.027409. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
10
A 'culture' shift: Application of molecular techniques for diagnosing polymicrobial infections.一种“文化”转变:分子技术在诊断混合感染中的应用。
Biotechnol Adv. 2019 May-Jun;37(3):476-490. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 20.