• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据抗逆转录病毒治疗方案中的第三种活性药物类别,CD4/CD8 比值的结果:来自魁北克人类免疫缺陷病毒队列研究的结果。

CD4/CD8 Ratio Outcome According to the Class of the Third Active Drug in Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens: Results From the Quebec Human Immunodeficiency Virus Cohort Study.

机构信息

Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Canada.

Clinique de Médecine Urbaine du Quartier Latin, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 8;76(11):1879-1888. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad056.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciad056
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of different therapeutic classes of drugs in antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens on the CD4/CD8 ratio is not well documented in people treated for HIV. The objective of this study was to analyze the long-term effect of exposure to integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) on CD4/CD8 ratio compared with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI) among ART-treated persons with HIV (PWH).

METHODS

Data from the Quebec HIV Cohort collected from 31 August 2017 were used. Our analysis included all patients in the cohort who received a first or subsequent ART regimen composed of 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and a third active drug of a different class (NNRTI, PI, or INSTI) for at least 16 weeks. Marginal structural Cox models were constructed to estimate the effect of different therapeutic classes on the CD4/CD8 ratio outcome.

RESULTS

Among the 3907 eligible patients, 972 (24.9%), 1996 (51.1%), and 939 (24.0%) were exposed to an ART regimen whose third active agent was an NNRTI, PI, or INSTI, respectively. The total follow-up time was 13 640.24 person-years. The weighted hazard ratio for the association between the third active class and CD4/CD8 ratio ≥1 was .56 (95% confidence interval [CI]: .48-.65) for patients exposed to NNRTI + 2 NRTIs and .41 (95% CI: .35-.47) for those exposed to PI + 2 NRTIs, compared with those exposed INSTI + 2 NRTIs.

CONCLUSIONS

For people treated for HIV, INSTI-based ART appears to be associated with a higher CD4/CD8 ratio than NNRTI and PI-based ART.

摘要

背景

在接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的人群中,不同治疗类别的药物对 CD4/CD8 比值的影响在艾滋病毒治疗中记录不佳。本研究的目的是分析整合酶链转移抑制剂(INSTI)与非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTI)或蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)相比,在接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的艾滋病毒感染者(PWH)中对 CD4/CD8 比值的长期影响。

方法

使用 2017 年 8 月 31 日从魁北克艾滋病毒队列收集的数据。我们的分析包括队列中所有接受至少 16 周由 2 种核苷逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTI)和 1 种不同类别(NNRTI、PI 或 INSTI)的第三种活性药物组成的首次或后续 ART 方案的患者。构建边缘结构 Cox 模型来估计不同治疗类别对 CD4/CD8 比值结果的影响。

结果

在 3907 名合格患者中,972 名(24.9%)、1996 名(51.1%)和 939 名(24.0%)分别暴露于包含 NNRTI、PI 或 INSTI 作为第三种活性药物的 ART 方案。总随访时间为 13640.24 人年。与暴露于 NNRTI + 2 NRTI 的患者相比,暴露于 INSTI + 2 NRTI 的患者与 CD4/CD8 比值≥1 的关联的第三活性类别的加权风险比为.56(95%置信区间 [CI]:.48-.65),暴露于 PI + 2 NRTI 的患者为.41(95% CI:.35-.47)。

结论

对于接受艾滋病毒治疗的人,基于 INSTI 的 ART 似乎与基于 NNRTI 和 PI 的 ART 相比,CD4/CD8 比值更高。

相似文献

1
CD4/CD8 Ratio Outcome According to the Class of the Third Active Drug in Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens: Results From the Quebec Human Immunodeficiency Virus Cohort Study.根据抗逆转录病毒治疗方案中的第三种活性药物类别,CD4/CD8 比值的结果:来自魁北克人类免疫缺陷病毒队列研究的结果。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 8;76(11):1879-1888. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad056.
2
Effects of first-line antiretroviral therapy on the CD4/CD8 ratio and CD8 cell counts in CoRIS: a prospective multicentre cohort study.一线抗逆转录病毒疗法对 CoRIS 中 CD4/CD8 比值和 CD8 细胞计数的影响:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Lancet HIV. 2020 Aug;7(8):e565-e573. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30202-2.
3
Comparative Impact of Suppressive Antiretroviral Regimens on the CD4/CD8 T-Cell Ratio: A Cohort Study.抑制性抗逆转录病毒治疗方案对CD4/CD8 T细胞比值的比较影响:一项队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(11):e3108. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003108.
4
Weight gain among treatment-naïve persons with HIV starting integrase inhibitors compared to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or protease inhibitors in a large observational cohort in the United States and Canada.在美国和加拿大的一个大型观察性队列中,与非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂或蛋白酶抑制剂相比,初治 HIV 感染者开始使用整合酶抑制剂后体重增加。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 Apr;23(4):e25484. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25484.
5
Assessment of antiretroviral third agent virologic durability after initiation of first antiretroviral regimen.首次抗逆转录病毒治疗方案启动后抗逆转录病毒第三种药物病毒学持久性的评估。
Int J STD AIDS. 2019 Jun;30(7):680-688. doi: 10.1177/0956462418815292. Epub 2019 May 1.
6
Is immune recovery different depending on the use of integrase strand transfer inhibitor-, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase- or boosted protease inhibitor-based regimens in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients?在初治 HIV 感染患者中,基于整合酶抑制剂、非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂或增效蛋白酶抑制剂的方案,免疫重建是否不同?
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Jan 1;75(1):200-207. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz421.
7
Reduction of CD8 T Cell Functionality but Not Inhibitory Capacity by Integrase Inhibitors.整合酶抑制剂对 CD8 T 细胞功能的抑制作用而非抑制能力。
J Virol. 2022 Mar 9;96(5):e0173021. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01730-21. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
8
Cardiometabolic Differences in People Living with HIV Receiving Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors Compared to Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: Implications for Current ART Strategies.与接受非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂的HIV感染者相比,接受整合酶链转移抑制剂的HIV感染者的心脏代谢差异:对当前抗逆转录病毒治疗策略的影响。
Viruses. 2024 Apr 10;16(4):582. doi: 10.3390/v16040582.
9
Time spent with residual viraemia after virological suppression below 50 HIV-RNA copies/mL according to type of first-line antiretroviral regimen.根据一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的类型,病毒学抑制低于 50 HIV-RNA 拷贝/ml 后与残余病毒血症相关的时间。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Oct;52(4):492-499. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
10
Impact of first-line antiretroviral therapy regimens on the restoration of the CD4/CD8 ratio in the CNICS cohort.一线抗逆转录病毒疗法方案对 CNICS 队列中 CD4/CD8 比值恢复的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Jun 1;75(6):1604-1610. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa024.