Institute of Virology, University Hospital, University of Bonngrid.10388.32, Bonn, Germany.
German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Bonn, Germany.
J Virol. 2022 Mar 9;96(5):e0173021. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01730-21. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
Although HIV-specific CD8 T cells are effective in controlling HIV infection, they fail to clear infection even in the presence of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and cure strategies such as "shock-and-kill." Little is known how ART is contributing to HIV-specific CD8 T cell function and the ability to clear HIV infection. Therefore, we first assessed the cytokine polyfunctionality and proliferation of CD8 T cells from ART-treated HIV+ individuals directly and observed a decline in the multifunctional response as well as proliferation indices of these cells in individuals treated with integrase inhibitor (INSTI) based ART regimens compared to both protease inhibitor (PI) and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) based regimens. We next cocultured CD8 T cells with different drugs individually and were able to observe reduced functional properties with significantly decreased ability of CD8 T cells to express IFN-γ, MIP1β and TNF-α only after treatment with INSTI-based regimens. Furthermore, previously activated and INSTI-treated CD8 T cells demonstrated reduced capacity to express perforin and granzyme B compared to PI and NNRTI treated cells. Unexpectedly, CD8 T cells treated with dolutegravir showed a similar killing ability 7 dpi compared to emtricitabine or rilpivirine treated cells. We next used a live cell imaging assay to determine the migratory capacity of CD8 T cells. Only INSTI-treated cells showed less migratory activity after SDF-1α stimulation compared to NRTI regimens. Our data show that the choice of ART can have a significant impact on CD8 T cell effector functions, but the importance for potential eradication attempts is unknown. Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTI) are recommended by national and international guidelines as a key component of ART in the treatment of HIV infected patients. In particular, their efficacy, tolerability and low drug-drug interaction profile have made them to the preferred choice as part of the first-line regimen in treatment-naive individuals. Here, we demonstrate that the choice of ART can have a significant impact on function and metabolism of CD8 T cells. In summary, our study provides first evidence on a significant, negative impact on CD8 T cell effector functions in the presence of two INSTIs, dolutegravir and elvitegravir, which may contribute to the limited success of eradicating HIV-infected cells through "shock-and-kill" strategies. Although our findings are coherent with recent studies highlighting a possible role of dolutegravir in weight gain, further investigations are necessary to fully understand the impact of INSTI-based regimens on the health of the individual during antiretroviral therapy.
尽管 HIV 特异性 CD8 T 细胞在控制 HIV 感染方面具有效力,但即使在抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)和“休克与杀伤”等治愈策略存在的情况下,它们也未能清除感染。目前尚不清楚 ART 如何影响 HIV 特异性 CD8 T 细胞的功能以及清除 HIV 感染的能力。因此,我们首先直接评估了接受 ART 治疗的 HIV+个体中 CD8 T 细胞的细胞因子多效性和增殖能力,结果观察到与基于蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)和非核苷逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTI)的方案相比,基于整合酶抑制剂(INSTI)的方案治疗的个体中,这些细胞的多功能反应和增殖指数均下降。接下来,我们将 CD8 T 细胞与不同的药物分别共培养,并观察到仅在用基于 INSTI 的方案治疗后,CD8 T 细胞表达 IFN-γ、MIP1β 和 TNF-α 的功能特性显著降低,表达穿孔素和颗粒酶 B 的能力也降低。此外,与 PI 和 NNRTI 处理的细胞相比,先前激活的和用 INSTI 处理的 CD8 T 细胞显示出表达 IFN-γ、MIP1β 和 TNF-α 的能力降低。出乎意料的是,与恩曲他滨或利匹韦林处理的细胞相比,用度鲁特韦处理的 CD8 T 细胞在 7dpi 时显示出相似的杀伤能力。接下来,我们使用活细胞成像测定法来确定 CD8 T 细胞的迁移能力。只有用 INSTI 处理的细胞在 SDF-1α 刺激后显示出比 NRTI 方案更低的迁移活性。我们的数据表明,ART 的选择可能会对 CD8 T 细胞效应功能产生重大影响,但对于潜在的根除尝试的重要性尚不清楚。整合酶链转移抑制剂(INSTI)被国家和国际指南推荐作为治疗 HIV 感染患者的 ART 的关键组成部分。特别是,其疗效、耐受性和低药物相互作用谱使其成为治疗初治个体一线方案的首选。在这里,我们证明了 ART 的选择可以对 CD8 T 细胞的功能和代谢产生重大影响。综上所述,我们的研究首次提供了证据,证明在两种 INSTI(度鲁特韦和艾维雷韦)存在的情况下,对 CD8 T 细胞效应功能有显著的负面影响,这可能导致通过“休克与杀伤”策略根除 HIV 感染细胞的效果有限。虽然我们的发现与最近强调度鲁特韦在体重增加方面可能作用的研究结果一致,但仍需要进一步的研究来充分了解基于 INSTI 的方案对个体在抗逆转录病毒治疗期间健康的影响。