• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计与验证模拟情境及评估工具:试点项目

Design and Validation of a Simulation Scenario and Assessment Tool: A Pilot Project.

机构信息

is a staff CRNA at Northern Light AR Gould Hospital in Presque Isle, Maine. Email:

is a staff CRNA at Forsyth Hospital in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

出版信息

AANA J. 2023 Feb;91(1):46-54.

PMID:36722783
Abstract

In 2016, the National Board of Certification and Recertification for Nurse Anesthetists (NBCRNA) launched a Continued Professional Certification (CPC) Program to promote lifelong learning and to facilitate ongoing professional competency checks for practicing certified registered nurse anesthesiologists (CRNA). The use of simulation-based assessment is currently being studied by the NBCRNA for potential use in the CPC Program. The aim of the pilot project was to create and validate simulation scenarios and assessment tools for potential incorporation into the CPC Program. Using the modified Delphi method, an expert panel of eight CRNAs evaluated the validity of four simulation scenarios and the content validity and reliability of four scenario-specific assessment tools. Each of the eight individual surveys assessing simulation scenario validity and assessment tool validity reached ≥ 75% agreement among the expert panelists. Overall content validity index values for the four assessment tools ranged from 0.960 to 0.993. There was a direct relationship between panelists' scores and level of performance on all returned assessment tools. The expert panel validated four simulation scenarios and four accompanying assessment tools. All scenarios and assessment tools were determined to have high content validity and reliability. Using these scenarios and assessment tools would provide unique advantages over standardized assessment methods.

摘要

2016 年,美国国家认证和再认证护士麻醉师委员会(NBCRNA)启动了持续专业认证(CPC)计划,以促进终身学习,并为执业注册护士麻醉师(CRNA)提供持续的专业能力检查。目前,NBCRNA 正在研究基于模拟的评估方法,以将其潜在应用于 CPC 计划。该试点项目旨在创建和验证模拟场景和评估工具,以潜在纳入 CPC 计划。使用改良 Delphi 法,一个由 8 名 CRNA 组成的专家小组评估了四个模拟场景的有效性,以及四个特定场景的评估工具的内容有效性和可靠性。评估模拟场景有效性和评估工具有效性的 8 个单独调查中的每个调查都达到了专家组≥75%的一致性。四个评估工具的总体内容有效性指数值范围为 0.960 至 0.993。在所有返回的评估工具上,专家组的评分与表现水平之间存在直接关系。专家组验证了四个模拟场景和四个配套的评估工具。所有场景和评估工具都被确定具有较高的内容有效性和可靠性。使用这些场景和评估工具将提供比标准化评估方法更独特的优势。

相似文献

1
Design and Validation of a Simulation Scenario and Assessment Tool: A Pilot Project.设计与验证模拟情境及评估工具:试点项目
AANA J. 2023 Feb;91(1):46-54.
2
Performance of certified registered nurse anesthetists and anesthesiologists in a simulation-based skills assessment.认证注册护士麻醉师和麻醉医生在基于模拟的技能评估中的表现。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jan;108(1):255-62. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818e3d58.
3
A pilot study evaluating the perceptions of Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists toward human patient simulation.一项评估注册护士麻醉师对人体患者模拟看法的试点研究。
AANA J. 2014 Oct;82(5):375-84.
4
Simulation-based Assessment of the Management of Critical Events by Board-certified Anesthesiologists.基于模拟的对获得董事会认证的麻醉医生危急事件管理的评估。
Anesthesiology. 2017 Sep;127(3):475-489. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001739.
5
Reliability of simulation-based assessment for practicing physicians: performance is context-specific.基于模拟的执业医师评估的可靠性:表现因具体情境而异。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 12;21(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02617-8.
6
Longitudinal assessment: A strategy to improve continuing professional certification.纵向评估:提升持续专业认证的策略。
J Prof Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec;37(6):1140-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
7
The Perceived Value of Certification in Nonsurgical Pain Management.非手术疼痛管理认证的感知价值。
AANA J. 2019 Feb;87(1):29-36.
8
Reliability and validity of the anesthesiologist supervision instrument when certified registered nurse anesthetists provide scores.认证注册护士麻醉师评分时麻醉师监督工具的信度和效度。
Anesth Analg. 2015 Jan;120(1):214-219. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000510.
9
Simulation performance checklist generation using the Delphi technique.使用德尔菲技术生成模拟性能检查表。
Can J Anaesth. 2007 Dec;54(12):992-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03016633.
10
CRNA performance using a handheld, computerized, decision-making aid during critical events in a simulated environment: a methodologic inquiry.在模拟环境中的危急事件期间使用手持式计算机化决策辅助工具时的CRNA表现:一项方法学探究。
AANA J. 2008 Feb;76(1):29-35.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Content Validation of a Nursing Clinical Simulation Scenario on Transfusion Reaction Management.输血反应管理护理临床模拟情景的开发与内容验证
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Aug 8;21(8):1042. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081042.