• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于互联网的心理健康调查研究:应对Reddit上的网络机器人

Internet-Based Mental Health Survey Research: Navigating Internet Bots on Reddit.

作者信息

Mournet Annabelle M, Kleiman Evan M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2023 Feb;26(2):73-79. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2022.0173. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1089/cyber.2022.0173
PMID:36724303
Abstract

This study was a multistage process of recruiting participants through Reddit with the intent of increasing data integrity when facing an infiltration of Internet bots. Approaches to increase data integrity centered around preventing the occurrence of Internet bots from the onset and increasing the ability to identify Internet bot responses. We attempted to detect bots in a study focused on understanding social factors related to autism and suicide risk. Four recruitment rounds occurred through Reddit on mental health-related subreddits, with one post made on each subreddit per recruitment round. We found high presence of bots in the initial rounds-indeed, using location data, one third of the total responses (33.4 percent; 118/353) came from just eight locations (i.e., 4.7 percent of all locations). The proportion of detected bots was significantly different across the rounds of recruitment (χ = 150.22, df = 3,  < 0.001). In round 4, language advertising compensation was removed from recruitment posts. This round had significantly lower proportions of detected bots compared with round 1 (χ = 33.01, df = 1,  < 0.001), round 2 (χ = 129.14, df = 1,  < 0.001), and round 3 (χ = 46.6, df = 1,  < 0.001). Through a multistage recruitment process, we were able to increase the integrity of our collected data, as determined by a low percentage of fraudulent responses. Only once we removed advertisement of compensation in recruitment posts, did we see a significant decrease in the quantity and percentage of Internet bot responses. This multistage recruitment study provides valuable information regarding how to adapt when an online survey study is infiltrated with Internet bots.

摘要

本研究是一个多阶段的过程,通过Reddit招募参与者,目的是在面对互联网机器人渗透时提高数据完整性。提高数据完整性的方法主要围绕从一开始就防止互联网机器人的出现,并增强识别互联网机器人回复的能力。我们试图在一项专注于理解与自闭症和自杀风险相关的社会因素的研究中检测机器人。通过Reddit在与心理健康相关的子版块上进行了四轮招募,每轮招募在每个子版块上发布一篇帖子。我们发现最初几轮中机器人的出现频率很高——实际上,利用位置数据,总回复量的三分之一(33.4%;118/353)仅来自八个位置(即所有位置的4.7%)。在各轮招募中,检测到的机器人比例存在显著差异(χ = 150.22,自由度 = 3, < 0.001)。在第4轮中,招募帖子中不再提及语言广告报酬。与第1轮(χ = 33.01,自由度 = 1, < 0.001)、第2轮(χ = 129.14,自由度 = 1, < 0.001)和第3轮(χ = 46.6,自由度 = 1, < 0.001)相比,这一轮检测到的机器人比例显著降低。通过多阶段招募过程,我们能够提高所收集数据的完整性,这由低比例的欺诈性回复来确定。只有当我们在招募帖子中不再提及报酬广告时,我们才看到互联网机器人回复的数量和比例显著下降。这项多阶段招募研究提供了有关在线调查研究被互联网机器人渗透时如何应对的宝贵信息。

相似文献

1
Internet-Based Mental Health Survey Research: Navigating Internet Bots on Reddit.基于互联网的心理健康调查研究:应对Reddit上的网络机器人
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2023 Feb;26(2):73-79. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2022.0173. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
Methodological Challenge: Addressing Bots in Online Research.方法学挑战:解决在线研究中的机器人问题。
J Pediatr Health Care. 2023 May-Jun;37(3):328-332. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2022.12.006. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
3
Threats of Bots and Other Bad Actors to Data Quality Following Research Participant Recruitment Through Social Media: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire.社交媒体招募研究参与者后对数据质量的机器人和其他不良行为者的威胁:横断面问卷调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 7;22(10):e23021. doi: 10.2196/23021.
4
Bot or Not? Detecting and Managing Participant Deception When Conducting Digital Research Remotely: Case Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial.是机器人还是人?在远程进行数字研究时检测和管理参与者欺骗:一项随机对照试验的案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 14;25:e46523. doi: 10.2196/46523.
5
Ensuring survey research data integrity in the era of internet bots.在互联网机器人时代确保调查研究数据的完整性。
Qual Quant. 2022;56(4):2841-2852. doi: 10.1007/s11135-021-01252-1. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
6
Identifying and Responding to Health Misinformation on Reddit Dermatology Forums With Artificially Intelligent Bots Using Natural Language Processing: Design and Evaluation Study.使用自然语言处理的人工智能机器人识别和应对Reddit皮肤科论坛上的健康错误信息:设计与评估研究。
JMIR Dermatol. 2021 Sep 30;4(2):e20975. doi: 10.2196/20975.
7
Characterizing Social Media Messages Related to Underage JUUL E-Cigarette Buying and Selling: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Reddit Subreddits.描述与未成年人购买和销售JUUL电子烟相关的社交媒体信息:Reddit子版块的横断面分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e16962. doi: 10.2196/16962.
8
Even good bots fight: The case of Wikipedia.即使是优秀的机器人也会“打架”:维基百科的例子。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0171774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171774. eCollection 2017.
9
E-Cigarette Surveillance With Social Media Data: Social Bots, Emerging Topics, and Trends.利用社交媒体数据进行电子烟监测:社交机器人、新兴话题及趋势
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Dec 20;3(4):e98. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.8641.
10
Bots, disinformation, and the first impeachment of U.S. President Donald Trump.机器人、虚假信息与美国总统唐纳德·特朗普的首次弹劾
PLoS One. 2023 May 8;18(5):e0283971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283971. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Imposters, Bots, and Other Threats to Data Integrity in Online Research: Scoping Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Best Practices.冒名顶替者、机器人及在线研究中数据完整性面临的其他威胁:文献综述与最佳实践建议
Online J Public Health Inform. 2025 Aug 29;17:e70926. doi: 10.2196/70926.
2
Addressing Fraudulent Responses in Quantitative and Qualitative Internet Research: Case Studies from Body Image and Appearance Research.应对定量和定性互联网研究中的欺诈性回复:来自身体形象与外貌研究的案例分析
Ethics Behav. 2024 Oct 3. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2024.2411400.
3
Evaluation of the Florida Newborn Screening Program Education Campaign.
佛罗里达新生儿筛查项目教育活动评估
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2025 Mar 10;11(1):20. doi: 10.3390/ijns11010020.
4
Data Verification and Respondent Validity for a Web-Based Sexual Health Survey: Tutorial.基于网络的性健康调查的数据验证与应答者有效性:教程
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 9;8:e56788. doi: 10.2196/56788.
5
Using Social Media to Recruit Participants in Health Care Research: Case Study.利用社交媒体招募医疗保健研究参与者:案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 11;26:e51751. doi: 10.2196/51751.
6
Evaluating the Problem of Fraudulent Participants in Health Care Research: Multimethod Pilot Study.评估医疗保健研究中欺诈性参与者的问题:多方法试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 4;8:e51530. doi: 10.2196/51530.