• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响急诊科工作人员对自杀危机就诊者决策的因素:系统评价。

Factors Influencing Emergency Department Staff Decision-Making for People Attending in Suicidal Crisis: A Systematic Review.

出版信息

Arch Suicide Res. 2024 Jan-Mar;28(1):35-49. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2023.2173113. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1080/13811118.2023.2173113
PMID:36724348
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency department (ED) staff are often the first point of contact for individuals in suicidal crisis. Despite this, there is no published research systematically examining the factors influencing decision-making for this patient group.

METHODS

MedLine, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched for three key concepts: (1) suicide, (2) accident and emergency department and (3) decision-making. Three reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full papers independently against the eligibility criteria. Data synthesis was achieved by extracting and analyzing study characteristics and findings. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess the quality of included studies.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. Studies were published from 2004 to 2020 and were of good methodological quality. A number of patient (method of self-harm, age, gender), contextual (availability of services and staff) and staff-related factors (attitudes, training, knowledge) were reported to influence decision-making for patients in suicidal crisis presenting to EDs.

CONCLUSION

Decision-making in the ED is complex and is influenced by patient, contextual and staff-related factors. These decisions can have an impact on the future care and clinical pathways of patients in suicidal crisis. Additional training is needed for ED staff specifically related to suicide prevention.

摘要

背景

急诊科(ED)工作人员通常是处于自杀危机中的个人的第一个接触点。尽管如此,目前还没有发表的研究系统地检查影响这群患者决策的因素。

方法

在 MedLine、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中搜索三个关键概念:(1)自杀,(2)急症室和(3)决策。三名审查员独立根据入选标准筛选标题、摘要和全文。通过提取和分析研究特征和结果来实现数据综合。混合方法评估工具(MMAT)用于评估纳入研究的质量。

结果

符合入选标准并纳入本系统评价的研究有 17 项。研究发表于 2004 年至 2020 年,方法学质量良好。许多患者(自残方式、年龄、性别)、环境(服务和人员的可用性)和工作人员相关因素(态度、培训、知识)被报告影响了急诊科自杀危机患者的决策。

结论

ED 的决策是复杂的,受到患者、环境和工作人员相关因素的影响。这些决策会对自杀危机患者的未来护理和临床路径产生影响。ED 工作人员需要接受专门针对自杀预防的额外培训。

相似文献

1
Factors Influencing Emergency Department Staff Decision-Making for People Attending in Suicidal Crisis: A Systematic Review.影响急诊科工作人员对自杀危机就诊者决策的因素:系统评价。
Arch Suicide Res. 2024 Jan-Mar;28(1):35-49. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2023.2173113. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
Prevention of self-harm and suicide in young people up to the age of 25 in education settings.在教育环境中预防25岁及以下年轻人的自我伤害和自杀行为。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD013844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013844.pub2.
3
Staff perspectives of emergency department pathways for people attending in suicidal crisis: A qualitative study.工作人员对自杀危机就诊者的急诊科治疗途径的看法:一项定性研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Jun;31(3):313-324. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12991. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
4
Factors within the clinical encounter that impact upon risk assessment within child and adolescent mental health services: a rapid realist synthesis.临床接触中的影响儿童和青少年心理健康服务风险评估的因素:快速现实主义综合评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jan;12(1):1-107. doi: 10.3310/VKTY5822.
5
"No Abnormality Detected": A Mixed-Methods Examination of Emergency Department Coding Practices for People in Suicidal Crisis.“未检测到异常”:对处于自杀危机中的人群急诊科编码实践的混合方法研究
Arch Suicide Res. 2025 Jan-Mar;29(1):163-176. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2337195. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
6
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.新一代抗抑郁药治疗儿童和青少年抑郁症:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;5(5):CD013674. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013674.pub2.
9
Interventions for primary prevention of suicide in university and other post-secondary educational settings.针对大学及其他高等教育环境中自杀初级预防的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 29;2014(10):CD009439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009439.pub2.
10
Crisis interventions for adults with borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍成人的危机干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD009353. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009353.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Piloting Implementation Design and Preliminary Readiness for Universal Suicide Risk Screening Program in Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Centre, Nepal: A Mixed-Method Study.尼泊尔一家三级护理中心急诊科通用自杀风险筛查项目的试点实施设计与初步准备情况:一项混合方法研究
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2024 Dec;62(280):803-813. doi: 10.31729/jnma.8832. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
2
Global prevalence of psychosocial assessment following hospital-treated self-harm: systematic review and meta-analysis.医院治疗的自我伤害后心理社会评估的全球患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJPsych Open. 2024 Jan 11;10(1):e29. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.625.
3
Adoption of mHealth Technologies by Community Health Workers to Improve the Use of Maternal Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa: Protocol for a Mixed Method Systematic Review.
社区卫生工作者采用移动健康技术改善撒哈拉以南非洲地区孕产妇保健服务利用情况:混合方法系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 May 4;12:e44066. doi: 10.2196/44066.