诚信至关重要：构建公平和道德的科学。
Trustworthiness matters: Building equitable and ethical science.
机构信息
Department of Sociology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
出版信息
Cell. 2023 Mar 2;186(5):894-898. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
Abstract
Trustworthy science requires research practices that center issues of ethics, equity, and inclusion. We announce the Leadership in the Equitable and Ethical Design (LEED) of Science, Technology, Mathematics, and Medicine (STEM) initiative to create best practices for integrating ethical expertise and fostering equitable collaboration.
摘要
可信的科学需要以伦理、公平和包容为核心的研究实践。我们宣布了科学、技术、数学和医学（STEM）领域的公平与伦理设计（LEED）领导力倡议，旨在为整合伦理专业知识和促进公平合作制定最佳实践。
相似文献
1
Trustworthiness matters: Building equitable and ethical science.诚信至关重要：构建公平和道德的科学。
Cell. 2023 Mar 2;186(5):894-898. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
2
Building trust: Leadership reflections on community empowerment and engagement in a large urban initiative.建立信任：领导力对大型城市倡议中社区赋权和参与的反思。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 28;23(1):1252. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15860-z.
3
Trustworthy artificial intelligence and ethical design: public perceptions of trustworthiness of an AI-based decision-support tool in the context of intrapartum care.值得信赖的人工智能和道德设计：公众对基于人工智能的决策支持工具在产时护理背景下的可信度的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jun 20;24(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00917-w.
4
Contextualizing engineering leadership development in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics.将工程领导力发展置于科学、技术、工程和数学的背景下。
New Dir Stud Leadersh. 2022 Mar;2022(173):139-147. doi: 10.1002/yd.20485.
5
Women in Systems Science and Gender Parity: Why and How to Democratize the "Technology, Innovation, and Society Nexus".女性在系统科学和性别均等中的作用：为什么以及如何使“技术、创新和社会的融合”民主化。
OMICS. 2022 Jun;26(6):329-338. doi: 10.1089/omi.2022.0055. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
6
Belonging in STEM: an interactive, iterative approach to create and maintain a diverse learning community.在 STEM 领域找到归属感：一种创建和维持多元化学习社区的互动、迭代方法。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2021 Nov;36(11):964-967. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
7
Fostering the conduct of ethical and equitable research practices: the imperative for integrated knowledge translation in research conducted by and with indigenous community members.促进道德和公平的研究实践：由原住民社区成员开展并与他们合作开展的研究中进行综合知识转化的必要性。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Nov 26;4:45. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0131-1. eCollection 2018.
8
Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work.将关键方法融入定量 STEM 公平工作中。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Mar;21(1):es1. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-06-0158.
9
Implementing inclusive practices in an active learning STEM classroom.在主动学习的 STEM 课堂中实施包容性实践。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2019 Jun 1;43(2):207-210. doi: 10.1152/advan.00045.2019.
10
Ethical Leadership and Employees' Perceptions About Raising Ethical Concerns to Managers in the Veterans Health Administration.道德领导力与退伍军人健康管理局员工对向管理人员提出道德问题的看法
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):155-163. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1634654. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
引用本文的文献
1
Engaging an advisory board in discussions about the ethical relevance of algorithmic bias and fairness.邀请一个顾问委员会参与有关算法偏见和公平性的伦理相关性的讨论。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 18;8(1):292. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01711-1.
2
Artificial Intelligence to Promote Racial and Ethnic Cardiovascular Health Equity.人工智能促进种族和族裔心血管健康公平。
Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2024 Nov;18(11):153-162. doi: 10.1007/s12170-024-00745-6. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
3
Race science without racists: how bigoted paradigms persist in allergy research.无种族主义者的种族科学：在过敏研究中如何坚持偏见范式。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 10;12:1351732. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1351732. eCollection 2024.
4
"Ethical Responsibility Very Often Gets Drowned Out": A Qualitative Interview Study of Genome Scientists' and ELSI Scholars' Perspectives on the Role and Relevance of ELSI Expertise.“伦理责任常常被淹没”：对基因组科学家和 ELSI 学者的观点进行的定性访谈研究，探讨 ELSI 专业知识的作用和相关性。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Oct-Dec;15(4):312-323. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2024.2370769. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
5
Large-scale neurophysiology and single-cell profiling in human neuroscience.大规模神经生理学和单细胞分析在人类神经科学中的应用。
Nature. 2024 Jun;630(8017):587-595. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07405-0. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
6
The advancement of artificial intelligence in biomedical research and health innovation: challenges and opportunities in emerging economies.人工智能在生物医学研究和健康创新中的进步：新兴经济体面临的挑战和机遇。
Global Health. 2024 May 21;20(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01049-5.
7
The Digital Therapeutics Real-World Evidence Framework: An Approach for Guiding Evidence-Based Digital Therapeutics Design, Development, Testing, and Monitoring.数字治疗真实世界证据框架：一种指导基于证据的数字治疗设计、开发、测试和监测的方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 5;26:e49208. doi: 10.2196/49208.
8
From lab to society: Fostering clinical translation of molecular systems engineering.从实验室到社会：促进分子系统工程的临床转化
Bioeng Transl Med. 2023 Jun 22;9(1):e10564. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10564. eCollection 2024 Jan.
9
Placing Publics in Public Health Genomics.将公众纳入公共卫生基因组学
Public Health Genomics. 2024;27(1):23-29. doi: 10.1159/000535942. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
10
Ethical, legal, and social implications of digital health: A needs assessment from the Society of Behavioral Medicine to inform capacity building for behavioral scientists.数字健康的伦理、法律和社会影响：来自行为医学学会的需求评估，以告知行为科学家的能力建设。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Feb 23;14(3):189-196. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad076.
本文引用的文献
1
A discussion on the notion of race in cognitive neuroscience research.关于认知神经科学研究中种族概念的讨论。
Cortex. 2022 May;150:153-164. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.11.007. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
2
Considering "Respect for Sovereignty" Beyond the Belmont Report and the Common Rule: Ethical and Legal Implications for American Indian and Alaska Native Peoples.超越《贝尔蒙报告》和《联邦法规法典》中“共同规则”来考量“尊重主权”：对美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民的伦理与法律影响
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Oct;21(10):27-30. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1968068.
3
The Illusion of Inclusion - The "All of Us" Research Program and Indigenous Peoples' DNA.包容的幻象——“我们所有人”研究项目与原住民的DNA
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 30;383(5):411-413. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1915987.
4
Genomics is failing on diversity.基因组学在多样性方面表现不佳。
Nature. 2016 Oct 13;538(7624):161-164. doi: 10.1038/538161a.
5
The ethics of characterizing difference: guiding principles on using racial categories in human genetics.界定差异的伦理学：人类遗传学中使用种族类别的指导原则
Genome Biol. 2008;9(7):404. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-7-404. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
6
Self-critical federal science? The ethics experiment within the U.S. Human Genome Project.自我批评的联邦科学？美国人类基因组计划中的伦理实验。
Soc Philos Policy. 1996 Summer;13(2):63-95. doi: 10.1017/s0265052500003460.
Zotero 插件