Suppr超能文献

过度诊断的长QT综合征的表型

Phenotypes of Overdiagnosed Long QT Syndrome.

作者信息

Bains Sahej, Neves Raquel, Bos J Martijn, Giudicessi John R, MacIntyre Ciorsti, Ackerman Michael J

机构信息

Medical Scientist Training Program, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Windland Smith Rice Sudden Death Genomics Laboratory, Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Windland Smith Rice Sudden Death Genomics Laboratory, Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Feb 7;81(5):477-486. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.036.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long QT syndrome (LQTS) predisposes individuals to arrhythmic syncope or seizure, sudden cardiac arrest, or sudden cardiac death (SCD). Increased physician and public awareness of LQTS-associated warning signs and an increase in electrocardiographic screening programs may contribute to overdiagnosis of LQTS.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to identify the diagnostic miscues underlying the continued overdiagnosis of LQTS.

METHODS

Electronic medical records were reviewed for patients who arrived with an outside diagnosis of LQTS but were dismissed as having normal findings subsequently. Data were abstracted for details on referral, clinical history, and both cardiologic and genetic test results.

RESULTS

Overall, 290 of 1,841 (16%) patients with original diagnosis of LQTS (174 [60%] female; mean age at first Mayo Clinic evaluation, 22 ± 14 years; mean QTc interval, 427 ± 25 milliseconds) were dismissed as having normal findings. The main cause of LQTS misdiagnosis or overdiagnosis was a prolonged QTc interval secondary to vasovagal syncope (n = 87; 30%), followed by a seemingly positive genetic test result for a variant in 1 of the main LQTS genes (n = 68; 23%) that was ultimately deemed not to be of clinical significance. Furthermore, patients received misdiagnoses because of a positive family history of SCD that was deemed unrelated to LQTS (n = 46; 16%), isolated/transient QT prolongation (n = 44; 15%), or misinterpretation of the QTc interval as a result of inclusion of the U-wave (n = 40, 14%).

CONCLUSIONS

Knowing the 5 main determinants of discordance between a previously rendered diagnosis of LQTS and full diagnostic reversal or removal (vasovagal syncope, "pseudo"-positive genetic test result in LQTS-causative genes, family history of SCD, transient QT prolongation, and misinterpretation of the QTc interval) increases awareness and provides critical guidance to reduce this burden of overdiagnosed LQTS.

摘要

背景

长QT综合征(LQTS)使个体易患心律失常性晕厥或癫痫、心脏骤停或心源性猝死(SCD)。医生和公众对LQTS相关警示信号的认识提高以及心电图筛查项目的增加可能导致LQTS的过度诊断。

目的

本研究旨在确定LQTS持续过度诊断背后的诊断错误。

方法

回顾电子病历,这些患者最初被诊断为LQTS,但随后经检查被判定为正常。提取转诊、临床病史以及心脏和基因检测结果的详细数据。

结果

总体而言,1841例最初诊断为LQTS的患者中有290例(16%)(174例[60%]为女性;首次在梅奥诊所评估时的平均年龄为22±14岁;平均QTc间期为427±25毫秒)经检查被判定为正常。LQTS误诊或过度诊断的主要原因是血管迷走性晕厥导致QTc间期延长(n = 87;30%),其次是主要LQTS基因之一的变异基因检测结果看似呈阳性(n = 68;23%),但最终被认为无临床意义。此外,患者因被认为与LQTS无关的SCD家族史阳性(n = 46;16%)、孤立/短暂性QT延长(n = 44;15%)或因包含U波而对QTc间期的错误解读(n = 40,14%)而被误诊。

结论

了解先前诊断的LQTS与完全诊断反转或消除之间不一致的5个主要决定因素(血管迷走性晕厥、LQTS致病基因的“假”阳性基因检测结果、SCD家族史、短暂性QT延长以及QTc间期的错误解读)可提高认识,并为减轻这种LQTS过度诊断的负担提供关键指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验